Top Ten Reasons Why Men Prefer Guns Over Women. . . 10. You can trade and old 44 for a new 22. 9. You can keep one gun at home and have another for when you're on the road. 8. If you admire a friend's gun and tell him so, he will probably let you try it out a few times. 7. Your primary gun doesn't mind if you keep another gun for a backup. 6. Your gun will stay with you even if you run out of ammo. 5. A gun doesn't take up a lot of closet space. 4. Guns function normally every day of the month. 3. A gun doesn't ask 'Do these new grips make me look fat?' 2. A gun doesn't mind if you go to sleep after you use it. And the Number One reason Why Me Prefer Guns Over Women. . . 1. You can buy a silencer for a gun!
Thing is if Antifa blocks voting they'll have to do so in urban areas where there are more Dem voters, so they would be blocking more Dems than Rep in the blue cities. Also videos and reports of them doing so would push more people to the polls to vote Rep/Trump.
Sigh, Democrats had a lead of 631,436 in mail in ballots - then in early in person voting the Republicans so far have a lead of 424,522 ballots therefore when you include all ballots "including mail in ballots" you get a current lead for Democrats of 206,914 votes.
The first sentence "1,467,992 Republicans, 1,043,470 Democrats & 607,373 NPAs voted in-person." refers only to in person voting totals and does not include mail in voting in those numbers. Thus Republicans lead in in person voting by 424,522 ballots.
However the second sentence points out that when mail in ballots are included, "Including mail in ballots, Democrats have a total lead of 206,914 votes."
They just didn't include the mail in voting totals which gave Democrats as always a huge lead. In in person early voting the Republicans are catching up. Doing the math from the above statistics that means that Democrats had a lead in mail in voting of 631,436 which has shrunk from the above in person early voting of 1,467,992 Republican to 1,043,470 Democrat by 424,522. Democrats mail in voting advantage 631,436 minus Republican early in person vote advantage of 424,522 equals current edge for Democrats of 206,914.
Total crap poll, these are the kinds of polls when you see these results way way out of wack with all the other polls that are just done to keep their preferred candidate up in the poll aggregates. Right now it looks they are trying desperately to stop Biden's slide in the polls so what better way than to throw in a poll so out of wack that it will all by itself skew the aggregate and stop the slide for a moment. They want to hide that Biden's support is actually falling.
Not disqualifying - don't have to be an attorney or even have prior experience in the judiciary. I mean any Democrat pick would suck, but she's what 73 years old, and given her health history she likely wouldn't last a heck of a lot longer. So if the Dems want to nominate justices in their 70's who am I to object.
The momentum is moving his way. The media is desperately trying to gin up the China virus fear again but they aren't getting much traction, they've almost worn it out. Whereas the Biden corruption scandal is gaining traction as the new sexy scandal - even better is that the social media and MSM have made it "forbidden news" and now it's going viral.
Read his stuff for awhile in 2016 cause he was a "god" of the left. He failed miserably in 2016. I figured Trump would win in 2016 but wasn't sure, the thing is all the polling and statistics are only as accurate as the assumptions they are based on - turn out, pollsters getting an accurate sample of actual voters, proper weighting and understanding of the data. If, a big if - you have decent data then it can get you in the ballpark but that's it. This year there are way too many unknowns for anyone to reasonably say what the outcome will be, they are all just guesses.
Most people get caught up in personal biases and in their own bubbles. Despite his denial of it - Nate and his 538 have their own biases leaning left when it comes to elections. RCP averages are skewed to the left too, by pollsters that are mostly left leaning.
The campaigns themselves have the best data usually. But they protect that data with their lives.
I look at the polls and see which seem to reflect what I can see evidenced by enthusiasm, money, where campaigns are going, and historical voting patterns of states involved along with party registrations, and tone and postings on social media.
What I see right now in one man fighting virtually all of big tech, MSM, wallstreet, big pharma, government unions, big social media, and the swamp of both parties. He won last time so they have all ratched up their games to crush him this time. But I also see that man has the most entusiasm by far in his campaign and his base. The only enthusiasm I see in the other campaign is not for their candidate but against the other candidate. Side by side if you look at the candidates one has charisma and energy. The other has a lack of energy and much less charisma. One is dynamic, the other is boring. One has a China created healthcare panic ginned up and polticized by the press and state governors who are destroying their economies and blaming or trying to blame it all on Trump. But one has a scandal that is disgusting showing more and more an abuse of office and power with an ugly and disgusting sex scandal too.
I think Trump will win (he should win Florida, Georgia, North Carolina, Arizona and Ohio) then the key is Pennsylvania where Biden is foundering. Trump can win Pennsylvania and take the election at that point - or he could win without Pennsylvania by taking Michigan and either Wisconsin or Minnesota. But I don't see that so much because if he were to take two or all of those three then I believe he would already have Pennsylvania.
They have complete trust in big tech to move the polls - Google has done it before in India and to a lesser extent in the US before - one study says Google can move the polls 3 to 5 points. Throw in the rest like Fakebook and Twatter and they figure another they can push out another 3 to 6 million votes - along with the effect of the MSM and Hollywood and TV's relentless Orange Man bad for 4 years - they figure maybe a cushion of 10 to 15 million votes added to their regular votes. Add in their vote harvesting (voter fraud organizations) and you get a nice 10 to 12 percent advantage to whatever the polls would normally be. That means Trump has to beat them by 11 to 13 percent or more to offset late voter manufacturing. But Americans can be fickle - if they think they are being taken for granted, manipulated, or treated condescendingly they can flip and kick out the doors. Here's to kicking out the doors. Kicking their arrogant condescending asses to the curb. Sending even a bigger FU than in 2016.
Well what I read says all magazines over 10 rounds would have to be registered too. There are an estimated 20 million AR15's alone, but they'll want every AK registered and all similiar weapons so add at least another 10 million so that's 30 million total which gets you 6 billion. But add all magazines over 10 rounds (registered under NFA which is a 200 tax stamp for each, guess they'll all have to be marked with a serialized number) so add all those pistol magazines for glocks, hi-powers, sigs, barretas, springfields, M&Ps, etc...... How many of those pistols are there? 150 million pistols maybe, of course the pistols don't have to be registered but every pistol magazine would have to be registered and the tax paid for each. So some people may only have one or two mags but most have more so lets settle on a lower number of say 5 mags per pistol. That's 750 million magazines, but wait can't forget all those rifle magazines that hold over ten rounds all those AR15, AK47, Thompson mags, Ruger 10/22 extended mags, Mini 14 mags, etc..... So what lets low ball it and say 3 mags per rifle (I know it's probably at least an average of 6 to 10) but let's say 3 - given 30 million evil rifles that's another 90 million magazines to register all at 200 a piece. So, 750 million pistol mags, 30 million evil rifles, 90 million rifle mags and we get 870 million NFA items at 200 a piece. That's 174 billion dollars for the privilege of owning what you already own. Bonus that when you register them and they decide to confiscate them later on they will know right where they are and who has them. Who knows maybe they will be super nice and pay you 200 per rifle and 10 dollars per magazine. That would cost them 14.4 billion which would leave them with an overall profit from registration of 159.6 billion.
60 too, It's all turnout now. At base polls accuracy are all dependent on assumptions about turnout, I pray that we will turnout at unprecedented levels to vote while the commies stay home with their mommies.