3
madamaw 3 points ago +3 / -0

Couldnt agree more. The Federal Government should be restrained to its Constitional authority. I don't see anywhere in there a clause that the government should be involved in maintaining retirement accounts.

Aside from that even though, it's bad economics. It's government centrally planning retirement accounts and we all know that central planning isnt just immoral and inherently corrupt by design, it is PAINFULLY ineffective at doing whatever it is trying to do.

2
madamaw 2 points ago +3 / -1

Does Oregon have a three strikes rule?

5
madamaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

You and I are smart enough to understand that is the implication. Libertarians have been trying to get a crowbar under this one for ages by pointing that out and have had basically no success. Social Security is still a very popular program even if its stupid.

11
madamaw 11 points ago +12 / -1

Most people don't understand the logic behind abolishing it, even if it is the right thing to do. This is messaging for optics because most people wrongly want social security to continue.

2
madamaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Most of the requests made of helpdesk people are very simple like "please change the phone number associated with my account." Companies save a lot of money and can reduce risk by automating simple tasks like that. I work for a large company that uses this technology and it has improved our end-user experience dramatically, resulting in an increase in sales. Before you would be chatting with someone from Bangladesh and they would fuck your order up a greater amount of the time than this system does because they usually don't speak English that well. These bots can be tailored to each language and the user can just pick whatever language they want.

Also, on the point of making it not human-like, that may make it difficult for some people to interact with which would defeat the purpose. Having to learn a whole bunch of commands just to do a simple thing like cancel your sub or change your phone number would be very tedious. Anthropomorphization of the bot helps humans relate to it what they are trying to do.

4
madamaw 4 points ago +4 / -0

Well yeah but its still a bot that this person is talking to. Trying to lay on the boycot guilt probaby wont work against a few lines of code running on a server is all I'm saying.

9
madamaw 9 points ago +10 / -1

Thats a bot btw

2
madamaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

Amplify this to the moon. Seriously can't believe they would include someone like this on their lineup. Gay people should be voting Republican in droves after that.

1
madamaw 1 point ago +1 / -0

God I can't wait to re-elect this fucking guy after watching this. It is absolutely skin crawling.

5
madamaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

JOE BIDEN HAS SCRAPPY WORKING-CLASS ROOTS?! ON WHAT FUCKING PLANET?!

13
madamaw 13 points ago +13 / -0

The last message typed into the chat before it was disabled was:

"We will not vote for a radical with dementia" 😂

8
madamaw 8 points ago +8 / -0

They disabled the chat!! LOOOOOL JIM CROW JOE AND KORRUPT KAMALA

5
madamaw 5 points ago +5 / -0

Literally standing at a crossroads talking about crossroads? Fuck you Kasich

7
madamaw 7 points ago +7 / -0

THIS MOTHERFUCKER SAID HE HAD AN OUT OF BODY EXPERIENCE WHEN HE FIRST SAW JOE BIDEN!! WHAT IS HAPPENING?!?!?!

6
madamaw 6 points ago +6 / -0

THIS MOTHERFUCKER SAID HE HAD AN OUT OF BODY EXPERIENCE WHEN HE FIRST SAW JOE BIDEN!! WHAT IS HAPPENING?!?!?!

2
madamaw 2 points ago +2 / -0

I think this whole thing was engineered to prevent Trump being re-elected, including the virus. Dems suck CCP dick like there's no tomorrow so it would be easy for them to coordinate this.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›