Shaka, when the walls feel.
There are scenarios where a weakened arterial wall leading to hemorrhage would result in a stroke, but if you were asked to define hemorrhagic stroke, you wouldn't say 'a weakened arterial wall'. You'd talk about a clot forming in response to hemorrhage and the clot, or a piece, breaking free and becoming a blockage in the brain.
Conversely, if you were going to describe an aneurysm, you'd talk about a weakened arterial wall that could rupture at any time and result in death.
Your description is far more consistent with 'aneurysm' than 'stroke' or even 'hemorrhagic stroke'.
I'm not throwing stones, or anything, though. It happens. I once confused the description of a diastasis recti with the description of a hiatal hernia and felt pretty embarrassed about it.
Nope. Stroke is caused by a weakened artery
You're describing an aneurysm, not a stroke. Strokes are caused by a blockage in a blood vessel in the brain.
Yeah, let's see how long he stands up to the pressure from the blues in the cities. He caved on a mask order and lockdowns. I'm not holding my breath.
Thank God the science is settled. CO2 pollution is causing the earth to get warmer, er, colder...ok...both warmer and colder. But also less pollution is causing the earth to get warmer.
Her body her choice. Simple as.
archive, please? If not because of the ad revenue angle, then because of the 'msm edits their stories' angle.
We need to have an intervention about your font choices, brother (or sister).
Everyone in this room loves you, but we have to be honest about where your choices are taking your life.
modern Boston Tea Party
That is...an intriguing characterization of this stock market thing.
and led the charge for universal white male suffrage, which was a big step forward in progress for the time.
Perverting the Republic by moving us a step closer to mob rule (true democracy) was not progress.
And if you can show that the democrat party has ever deviated from the course of using whatever means is at their disposal to empower and enrich themselves, then I might consider your point made.
The only thing I've ever seen the democrat party change, is their tactics.
I suppose it's unfair to blame Jackson for the inevitability of the central bank, but I still blame him for being the progenitor of the democrat party.
The 'big switch' is a myth, I'm afraid.
The democrat oligarchs are the same kinds of people they always have been. People willing to exploit others, willing to use any means, to serve their ends of amassing power and wealth.
What we think of as a 'party switch' was just the democrat oligarchs changing tactics; exchanging one set of tools for another. Just as they have done in recent years by abandoning the American worker as soon as it was profitable to do so.
Maybe this is true of most politicians, but the democrats seem to be the party that most consistently empowers champions of policies and ideologies that run counter to those this country was founded upon.
Did he? Weird. I read just the other day about some Federal Central Bank. Must have been mistaken.
Why? Do we need a second Democrat party? I thought the GOP were already filling that role.
Well, he's a democrat, so vampire is probably not far from the truth.
Why do we have the founder of the Democrat party stickied to the top of our site for patriots?
The Democrat party might very well be the most destructive force for evil ever unleashed on our country.
Herp Derp, we're gonna win an election ever again, derp.
Let's donate money to the circus!
God knows him.
What good are the words, murals, or praise of evil people anyway?
There is no peaceful secession.
It's like peacefully rioting or peacefully storming the capitol or peacefully sending people to the gulags.
You can't jump into a swimming pool and expect to stay dry. If you want to jump in, you'll be wet. If you want to stay dry, don't jump in.
That's fine. I'm a law-abiding citizen with nothing to hide and this won't change until the moment it does.
If the FBI wants to pay for me to be entertained during the day, I'm all for it. I've been on /pol/ for 5 years now. It would feel weird if the FBI wasn't watching.
How do people still not comprehend the concept of election fraud?
While I believe that a person does not have an obligation to submit to a government that is illegitimate and does not have any legal authority, never forget that most governments govern through force.
The US government absolutely will enforce its orders. Legal arguments will not protect you. The courts are no longer about justice, but merely another enforcement arm of the government.
How are people not understanding the concept of MASSIVE ELECTION FRAUD being enshrined as law?
The country we grew up in no longer exists.