1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Uh, you don't have to be in the military over 5 years to be in spec ops. Nor do you have to be in spec ops to know they don't announce shit in Facebook lol

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Give an example of a clandestine mission announced beforehand as a training mission. Spent 5 years in military, all missions were kept under wraps for opsec. Never heard of an announced mission, ever, especially a secret one.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Q to me Q to you, Q go pee but Q never poo

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Clandestine operations aren't announced on fb before or after they happen. That's what clandestine means.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, and neither does the kick back/pay to play scheme or dnc whistleblowers admitting to taking part in the vote switching.

3
maisyrusselswart 3 points ago +3 / -0

The kickback stuff is not evidence of election fraud. Its just corruption. So it seems irrelevant to the case.

4
maisyrusselswart 4 points ago +4 / -0

Go to the ACLJ YouTube they have lots of clips where they discuss everything election related

3
maisyrusselswart 3 points ago +3 / -0

Impotent opposition that brings in the crowds. He won't bring on Byrne but he'll complain a lot without the evidence.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yea, he does kind of have that about him. Like I said, though, this doesn't increase my confidence that barnes is wrong. That "article" is a joke. And it links to breaking defense article that debunks it. Makes zero sense.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

He said 1 source said raided, 2 didn't know. And there was no info on why the raid happened from the 1 source. So if it did happen at all it may be unrelated.

2
maisyrusselswart 2 points ago +2 / -0

Barnes says he has a reputation as a nutcase. And he has no experience in any kind of law besides libel/defamation cases, i.e. we shouldn't expect much out of his election stuff since he's a novice wrt elections and election law.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

So...did anyone read the link explaining what the kraken is? Because its described as an automated base security system used in Afghanistan. Has nothing to do with cyber security.

This article does not make me confident the rumors about lin wood being a nut job are false.

-4
maisyrusselswart -4 points ago +1 / -5

How did they throw kyle under the bus? This is just more if the hysterical crying i was talking about. If you have to make up the reasons you're crying and taking your ball home, then you're acting like a child.

Not to mention, this is standard operating procedure on the left, i.e. be in a permanent state of paranoia looking for traitors and apostates and attacking anyone you hallucinate to fit that description.

-9
maisyrusselswart -9 points ago +3 / -12

Boycott temper tantrums based on nothing real is childish. Boycotts ought to be used against actual targets, not coffee companies who write innocuous press releases. There's a contingent on this site who act like crybully leftists trying to cancel anyone who even looks like they're disagreeing. Its lame and ghey

2
maisyrusselswart 2 points ago +3 / -1

You think if rittenhouse had a Goya shirt on goya would be like "that's our guy!"?

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +4 / -3

There's a bunch of morons on a canceling spree around here lately, and a lot of group think too.

SoMeoNe dIdnT telL Me whaT I WaNT to HeAr sO wE ShouLd bOyCotT aNd DesTroY TheIr bUsinEsS

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

That's a lot of assumptions you got there. Good luck.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Release the kraken" is figure of speech. The only fabricating has been people speculating that it has some deeper, hidden meaning.

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like kraken fabrication

What does that mean?

she based that “millions of votes stolen” on unreliable Edison research feed.

You've seen the data she has?

That’s why now she says only small number of votes were stolen, “algorithm was broken” and counting had to be turned off

Where does she say that only a small number of votes were stolen?

But it’s all pretty much irrelevant because she can prove sanders-AOC conspiracy

Huh?

1
maisyrusselswart 1 point ago +1 / -0

It would be designed that way purposely. A close race would be flipped and it would be undetected. If it isn't close the pre-programmed ratios of flipped votes would have to change.

And if what you say is true then the whole dominion and German server issue is irrelevant.

Why? The vote flipping is the dominion issue.

Sidney is gonna tell the judge that a few votes were switched to Biden but that didn’t change anything so the algo and counting had to be shut down. What’s the point of that?

Uh, no. Based on what she's said she's going to claim millions of votes were switched across several states. Flip them back and trump wins. When she says they had to shut it down, I take her to mean they realized the vote flipping wouldn't be enough so they shut down the counting to bring in fraudulent ballots to make up the remaining difference. This is where all the dead people, people who moved, stolen absentee ballots, etc come in.

2
maisyrusselswart 2 points ago +2 / -0

I thought the issue was that the electronic fraud was only capable of flipping a certain percentage of votes like, say, 3%. If trump was ahead by more than that they would need to stuff the ballot box. That's when you need the old fashioned voter fraud of big corrupt dem cities.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›