Was out of mobile signal for all of today since 7am or so and just got home. It looks like a lot happened and I'm not sure what's real and fake (ie. WI election changes illegal and votes null/not null, electors in multiple states lead/don't lead to contested election, CO possibly in play..)

Wondering if a pede would be kind enough to give a quick accurate / correct summary?

15
21

Trying to be a little objective here, I am noticing that some details of the EO are being missed or glossed over.

In the first 45 days, DNI (Radcliffe) is responsible for a high level assessment to POTUS and others.

However, within the next 45 days (ie. up to 90 days after election) a detailed report is due. This is to be provided by the Attorney General and Secretary of Homeland Security. Who are these folks? If you guessed Bill Barr and Chad Wolf...ding ding ding, winner winner chicken dinner.

Also note that creation of the process for each group's responsibility in the EO involved Bill Barr. I believe Kristjen Nielsen was also involved - the latter I am not sure if she is swamp or not (likely to one extent or another). Nielsen served under Bush, but also pushed for merit based immigration.

It looks like in the EO, there are direct paths to SCOTUS, but wouldn't be surprised if Barr and Wolf inject roadblocks with their report.

Edit: direct path to POTUS, not SCOTUS, sorry for the typo

29
13

Hate throwing Abe under the bus, but hear me out, using liberal tactics against them.

Emancipation proclamation wasn't to free slaves. It was to screw the rebelling states over. This is evidenced by the fact that the proclamation only applied to the rebelling states.

As such, celebrating Juneteenth is celebrating slaves being used by the Union as pawns against the Confederacy and is a racist holiday.

Thoughts?