0
marco100 0 points ago +0 / -0

He needs a haircut. Seriously. That's not some kind of radical or trendy or cool "look." He looks like a disheveled, undisciplined bum. And that's just the way he behaves, too.

1
marco100 1 point ago +1 / -0

"Although when xir clothes came off, I saw a peen and balls, I presumed that Fiona Hill, the person I was having sex with, was a woman. 2+2 = 4." --Gordon Sondland

9
marco100 9 points ago +9 / -0

Kapernick should boycott the racist NFL. I'm sure if he thought about it for a minute, he'd realize that there's no way such a hero of the oppressed as he believes himself to be, should even consider working for the racist NFL. He'd just be a highly compensated slave.

8
marco100 8 points ago +8 / -0

Forget whether he was a president or not. How can anyone not know that "benjamin" = $100 bill???? Now THAT's stOOPID.

2
marco100 2 points ago +2 / -0

Haberman knows it must be true because Ambassador Sondland was her source. (Sondland didn't actually talk to the Navy Secretary, he just presumed he would resign. That's good enough for Adam Schiff, so it's good enough for Haberman.)

8
marco100 8 points ago +8 / -0

Yovanovitch is an idiot/prima donna like the rest of those deep state State Dept. and NSC bureaucrats. Apparently she made a demand in March that Pompeo publicly issue a statement of support for her (because she was hacked off at what Giuliani was doing behind the scenes), as a condition for remaining as Ambassador. Pompeo declined to issue a public statement of support. Stupid on her part, what leverage did she actually think she had? She gave an ultimatum which was rejected. She actually fired herself from the job. On what job can the employee or subordinate dictate to their supervisor, boss, owner of the company, etc. like that? She made a threat to leave as Amabassador if she didn't get what she wanted. So leave you bch. She also evidently tried to put pressure on Trump and Pompeo by complaining to certain members of Congress. Again, try that in any normal job and see how long you last.

Yet months later she ends up crying and whining in Congress??? That's her "payback" but her testimony didn't strike me as that of a hero, but rather, that of an entitled spoiled bratty prima donna ass.

4
marco100 4 points ago +4 / -0

Pretty much all polling is showing that there is less than 50% support for impeachment from the electorate. How can Democrats justify it when less than a majority of Americans support it? The whole thing is so ridiculous, even as a purely "political exercise."

Also, there are so many bear traps for the Dems if a Senate trial happens. I would really love for someone to explore Fiona Hill's testimony that 1) she saw the Steel Dossier the day before it was publicized and 2) she believes Steele was "played" by the Russians and the Dossier was a "rabbit hole." (You don't see this part of her testimony on the MSM, do you?)

Obviously Steele wasn't "played," he deliberately disseminated Russkie disinformation about Trump--that's what he was getting paid for!--and Fiona Hill knows Steele wasn't an innocent dupe of the Russians.

Bottom line is that Fiona HIll's testimony is that the Dossier was complete b.s., phoney Russian-sourced propaganda to influence the outcome of the 2016 election, and that she KNEW what it was before it was ever released.

Right now I think Pelosi will find some excuse to never hold an impeachment vote, unless the polling swings heavily in favor of it, which seems very unlikely at this point.

I bet the House will vote to censure Trump not to impeach him.