1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

The fine print is that you lose citizen status when you engage in wrongthink.

5
masticator_nord 5 points ago +5 / -0

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

But for reals, a lot of the people here are straight retarded. Like, literally the mirror image of the leftists you moan about.

3
masticator_nord 3 points ago +3 / -0

Who is this guy? Some kind of far-right conspiracy theorist?

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

No, she's trying to buy votes for Dems in congress in the midterms.

They do this every election.

4
masticator_nord 4 points ago +5 / -1

No, it's just human nature. If the cabal were so powerful and smart that they could pull off the plots attributed to them, then they wouldn't need the plots.

8
masticator_nord 8 points ago +8 / -0

We're in the, "people realize that democracy causes chaos and so demand a strong leader to bring stability" phase of anacyclosis.

3
masticator_nord 3 points ago +3 / -0

Covid kills it like it kills everything else. Follow The Science!

2
masticator_nord 2 points ago +2 / -0

You don't need a chief of staff if you have no staff. 😏

2
masticator_nord 2 points ago +2 / -0

My point is that there's 2 fronts we're fighting. The cultural revolution, which is Marxist, and the globohomo agenda, which is fascist.

The 2 are related because the communists end up being the drivers and footsoldiers of the fascists because the fascists whisper sweet-nothings into their ears (and communists are full on retarded).

But the communists and the fascists are working on different axes, although they often intersect.

For what it's worth, I think James Lindsay's take on the WEF/globohomo axis is the most accurate. He describes it as a dialectical synthesis of communism and fascism.

And the reason for splitting hairs on stuff like this is if you call everything communism, then you sound as retarded as the leftists who call everything fascism. So normies will assume you're retarded and not listen to your warnings.

0
masticator_nord 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm a student of Lindsay. He's specifically said that the corparatist ESG/WEF nonsense is a daliectical synthesis of communism and fascism. He's referred to the Chinese system in a similar way.

Communism is predicated on class revolution. Where is that here?

Sure, communists are the drivers and footsoldiers, but that's only because they're retarded.

2
masticator_nord 2 points ago +2 / -0

Marxism being authoritarian doesn't imply that everything authoritarian is Marxist.

I'm well aware that all of these things end in the same place (essentially a form of feudalism). But "mechanism" of communism, class revolution to socialism eventually giving way to the communist utopia, isn't what we're dealing with (on some level it is with CRT and school indoctrination). What we're seeing is governments utilizing corporations to take people's freedoms in ways that they can't legally do themselves, while at the same time governments are beholden to their corporate donors.

So there's a merging of corporations and governments going on where corporations are essentially becoming an enforcement branch of the government that's not accountable to anything.

How is that communism?

-4
masticator_nord -4 points ago +2 / -6

"Everything I don't like is communism."

People here are as bad as leftists.

17
masticator_nord 17 points ago +17 / -0

I'm not especially informed about all of this, but this is the mechanism the WEF is using to usher in what is something like an inverted form of fascism. For our safety, of course.

James Lindsey mentions this fairly frequently. He's mainly fighting the retarded neo-commie movement, but he says the power behind it is the ESG/sustainability movement being pushed by Klaus Schwab and the billionaire class. In reality it's a power grab by them. They want to own literally everything (hence you'll own nothing and be happy) and rule the world because they know in their heart of hearts that once they ascend to godhood (they're also all transhumanists) they'll have the power and wisdom to usher in utopia.

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

From the people who advocate against the electoral college for exactly this reason.

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

Artificial wombs represent the ultimate conquering of nature. They're the final commodification of life. They won't end abortion, they'll increase it. Your idea that fetuses would be transplanted onto life support is a fantasy. What argument will be left to defend the newborn when life becomes so cheap (metaphysically) that a new human being can be spun up in a machine on a whim?

With artificial wombs will come the desire for genetic engineering of offspring and "designer babies." Having children naturally will be seen as a risk since you can't ensure that your kid will turn out how you want (you wanted a boy but nature gave you a girl or vice versa is an easy example of an instance where that might play out).

The more capacity mankind has over the production of a thing the less valuable that thing is. Nothing good could possibly come from a technological method of producing human beings.

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

I mean, I agree. But, as retarded a belief as it is, it's important to understand that people believe it wholeheartedly and the rationalization they use for it.

8
masticator_nord 8 points ago +8 / -0

People actually believe this. Here's how the commie "logic" goes:

If everybody is able to just say whatever they want, then that allows the dominating systems of society to operate as normal. Thus, in such scenarios, the oppressed are threatened by the untrammeled speech of their oppressors and are unable to speak out. So marginalized voices are silenced, and their domination is reinforced. Hence the marginalized aren't free to speak, so there isn't free speech.

6
masticator_nord 6 points ago +6 / -0

In case anybody doesn't understand this yet, that's actually what they believe. In their minds white supremacy was the direct cause of all those "whoopsies" (coloredpeople of color can't commit terrorism).

After all, could a Black (with caps!) folxxxx be led to such rage if it weren't for the inequitable conditions caused by white supremacy? Of course not! If we didn't live in a white supremacist society, then there would be "justice" and hence no need to seek vigilante justice (again, not terrorism). So white supremacy is the direct cause of these various "ouchies," and hence is the greatest threat to society. QED

Edit: finally figured out the dang strikethrough.

1
masticator_nord 1 point ago +1 / -0

So the people he promised tens of thousands of dollars if they voted for him stopped supporting him when it became clear he had no intention of fulfilling his promise?

5
masticator_nord 5 points ago +5 / -0

That's only like $6/person if everybody in the world contributes. Surely everybody on the planet has $6 they can sacrifice to stop fascism! Just don't buy your coffee that morning!

view more: Next ›