2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

LOL Unintelligible sheep noises ๐Ÿคฃ

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don't for a minute believe that she got the jab, either--not with the immune issues she's had for decades. Gimmeabreak.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

He can keep voting the way he does ๐Ÿ‘๐Ÿ˜ƒ...but I can't stand him.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

And they're gonna enforce it "through traffic stops." ๐Ÿคฃ Good luck with that. Just hide out until 2024, when they "revisit" it.

4
mateus 4 points ago +4 / -0

OMG Absolutely disgusting--๐Ÿ™„ and why you suddenly never see the starting lineup before they dive in.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm sure the cops just "talked to her," then let her go--like they did with Dennis Rodman, when he refused to wear a mask on a flight.

6
mateus 6 points ago +6 / -0

That's odd. If you go to their website, they make no mention of mandatory jabs for employees--and they should because they go into the physical requirements of the job. One would think it would be on the application, too.


There's been a lot of online activity extolling the relative virtues of DTC compared to Carhartts, people saying they're changing where they make their purchases, and directing others there. Maybe DTC doesn't want to impede that additional traffic lol. OR maybe they don't want to commit themselves to NOT instituting a future mandate if they don't have one now.


I noticed some tweets that they DO have a mandate, and some saying they have a "vax or weekly negative test" option. I wouldn't be surprised if some Carhartts employees are posting incorrect info to make DTC seem less appealing. All the more reason for DTC to be upfront, and release that info, themselves.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fake.

"COLORADO SHOOTING SUSPECT BOOKED INTO JAIL TODAY" was banner under that screenshot about the Colorado supermarket shooter.


The caption was changed for a MEME. The OP should've used the sh*tpost flair....or he didn't do his homework.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Maybe it'll help convince some of the products of today's educational system who post here that MLK Jr was no "patriot."

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Like it's so much better there, where criminal "migrants" are running the show, decimating French culture, and setting up "no-go" zones.


Just ask Brigitte Bardot, who's been threatened with fines and "consequences" for speaking her mind in her own damn country, which she now doesn't even recognize.


Memo to the OP: France sucks.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Joyless Behar pretends she's a Jew? ๐Ÿคฃ Since when? That'd be pretty hard to do, especially since she le lets everyone know at every opportunity that she's a [lapsed] Catholic. Thanks for the laugh.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

Exactly. I've been asking that for almost a year. There's something very sinister about pushing to get "every last person" jabbed.

6
mateus 6 points ago +7 / -1

Deport. This is a pro-Trump site. Goodbye.

3
mateus 3 points ago +3 / -0

Even the alphabet networks didn't carry it. Either that, or the local affiliates didn't break away.

1
mateus 1 point ago +1 / -0

I do that all the time lol. Like you, I'm sure, I've read, seen, and heard many things from any number of sources throughout my life. I never post links unless I'm starting a thread and want to share specific subject matter.


As for those who post the snarky Source?, it's not my responsibity to "source" my recollections. They can do the research. We'd all be citing sources all day. As if we're all supposed to know that others might not know something, anyway. I mean, Abe Lincoln was the 16th president. If somebody questions that, they can look it up lol.

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

Unbelievable...homeless people bringing pit bulls into a library, then passing out there, as they would on the street, letting their dogs roam unattended.

BTW, for those who don't want to download a flippin' Reddit app ๐Ÿ™„to view the video:

https://www.ktvu.com/news/guard-attacked-by-pitbull-in-san-francisco-public-library

Why the heck did this triple post?

2
mateus 2 points ago +2 / -0

I heard is no different from I read or I saw--as in on the news.

51
mateus 51 points ago +51 / -0

When the ACLU and Biden's Justice Dept side with the plaintiff, you KNOW the city (Boston)--and lower courts-- made the wrong move.


It's been established that that third flagpole constitutes a public forum, and has been used by LGBTQ-Z groups and other private causes. In addition, the group wanted to display the "Christian flag" for a verry narrow purpose, during some type of display of religious influence in the city's history--wholly appropriate. Also, how interesting that Boston's refusal to fly this flag was the ONLY refusal among requests from 234 agencies/groups, and that they no longer allow anyone else to display flags on that pole.๐Ÿ™„


Yup. Boston's gonna lose this one.

5
mateus 5 points ago +5 / -0

Did you see the comments (tweets)? The usual suspects--who are NOT their clientele currently--claiming they're gonna "buy more to make up for" the boycotters. Gimmeabreak.


This us exactly what Biden wants: private companies to go ahead with their own mandates. I hope those who buy their products now DO boycott, and I hope it affects their bottom line. Bastards.

1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

๐Ÿค” There have been a number of posts on this Rasmussen poll, but this is the first criticizing Trump supporters because of the libtards' views.


So, either the OP is the crazy one--or he's a shill.

view more: Next ›