1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

1.Another vaccine enthisiast dies.

  1. "Experts" are already making excuses, claiming that an autopsy won't likely point to the vaccine as a cause of death because death didn't occur immediately.

  2. They're conjecturing that she had health problems she was unaware of. Sure. Some unknown condition caused her heart, liver, and a kidney to fail, but it won't be attributable to the vaccine.

  3. This jab was required by her employer, and coworkers all experienced "flu-like symptoms of varying degrees and severity. I know how vaccines work, and that an immune response is to be expected. It's ironic, however, that people getting a vaccine experience a wide range of symptoms, while asymptomatic people are treated like lepers if they're not wearing masks.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

I thought you were referring to the peanut butter lol.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

🤔 Rachel Madcow, is that you?

I know this is only your THIRD post, but you've slready given yourself away.

This little girl will be blaming Democrats (and RINOs, who've proven that they're actually Democrats), and their neverending welfare programs, along with their scheme to defraud AMERICANS who worked their whole damn lives only to see THEIR benefits decrease or stagnate so that Social Security and Medicare can be handed to illegals and "refugees".

Get lost.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

I'm not surprised.

I love all the assumptions: people who express a differing opinion are trolls, those who don't refer to a dude in a dress as a female are "transphobes" (another made-up word).

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Hilarious.

95.1% responded "No" to her query about whether email accounts should be closed if others mentioned "Super Straight," even though she added "I am a transphobe" to the "No". 🤣🤣

-1
mateus -1 points ago +1 / -2

🙄

There's always at least one who misses the point.

-1
mateus -1 points ago +1 / -2

OMG That's hilarious!

I could do that next time DH and I stop at HD or Lowe's...or both! 😃

8
mateus 8 points ago +9 / -1

Come on, guys, let's go, guys....c'mon, let's go guys... It's the same old droning voice at every "outing."

Who is that dame?

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

LOL Give me a break with the Diana of Assisi crap.

That dame was a narcissistic psychopath--locking herself in the bathroom, throwing herself down stairs, freaking out over the paparazzi (whom she'd regularly tip off about her gym trips 😉), holding up the works so she could get her eyes just right in that famous photo of her in a mask, repeatedly calling--and hanging up on-- one of her many ex-lovers, anorexia, bulimia, her obsession with her appearance...and, sure... it was all the fault of the Windsors. The Diana adoration from some just won't die.

This isn't about the rest of that horsey, inbred clan. It's about an idiotic comment that an old woman "enabled" an adult son. And it's not about Charles, who obviously got his obligatory heirs and then just wanted to talk to Camilla for 3 hours about the new Acrotaphus wasp species found in the Amazon.

It's always a collusion of fools when these people hook up and, yes, that includes Meghan. She didn't think it through, either. These people all deserve each other.

1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

🤔 And who "enabled" Margaret? Edward VIII......Princess Caroline? Answer: No one. Like other families, royal families have always had their black sheep.

Diana wasn't the only contributor to Elizabeth's annus horribilis, but not for lack of trying. And Meghan's doing the same thing now , along with dense-like-Di Harry.

But thanks for the laugh.

1
mateus 1 point ago +4 / -3

Let's see...Markle is a whiner, just as Dense Di was. Markle is an opportunist, while Di was an uneducated, virginal twit drawn into the fairy tale. Di was tall, Markle's a shrimp...

The only one I feel sorry for is Queen Elizabeth, who had to deal with Diana's crap, and now has to do it all over again with Markle.

1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

One of the articles even specified allowing vaccinated people to have dinner together--in one's own home lol.

We're continuing to entertain friends and relatives without checking their vaccine status, and we're going to their homes, too.

Sane people aren't waiting for approval from the CDC.

1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

That op-ed title is so offensive, it's almost laughable.

They were all over Trump like a cheap suit from the minute he announced his candidacy for no reason, yet we're supposed to give that election thief, that geriatric empty vessel, that squatter...a break?

No way, José.

1
mateus 1 point ago +2 / -1

LOL Swamp denizens aren't going to make that decision any more than they did when Trump announced his candidacy for 2016.

44
mateus 44 points ago +45 / -1

Emilia Decaudin.

He identifies as female (and a lot of other stuff). Apparently, there was a "one man, one woman" rule in place for district seats to ensure female parity. Now he's the female for that district lol.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Emilia Decaudin.

He identifies as female (and a lot of other stuff). Apparently, there was a "one man, one woman" rule in place for district seats to ensure female parity. Now he's the female for that district lol.

0
mateus 0 points ago +1 / -1

Emilia Decaudin.

He identifies as female (and a lot of other stuff). Apparently, there was a "one man, one woman" rule in place for district seats to ensure female parity. Now he's the female for that district lol.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›