Thanks for the reply. To me I guess it's about 20% chance of habbenning, so I like a 50 to 1 odds, in theory. But I've never done online betting before, so I'm not sure I'm the right mark for an actual bet.

It's less about the money, and seeing if people are willing to put their money where their mouth is, as you understand I think.

What odds are you willing to put up? 100 to 1?

Instead of watching mindless TV and playing video games, people are studying current events and growing skeptical of official narratives. I call that a win.

Green Screen, or deepfake

And it was very unusual. He did so to break some historic record thing.

It's called probabilistic thinking. There are multiple possible explanations for events thus far, and not much is conclusive.

That is not a concession. Remember Pompeos "smooth transition"

Exactly.

Things are extremely confusing right now. Trump knows how to communicate. He did not communicate a concession.

AMEN friend! May God bless and guide you. His Word is truth.

At many levels, of course. But not yet for the presidential election.

Congress has not accepted the electors. The system has checks and balances to counter fraud, and they have yet to all play out. This kind of thing has happened before.

The system has not yet failed.

Yes, exactly. I postulated the same thing. Just a Trump inauguration is no longer enough.

B A S E D

Uh, you must not be understanding what "in minecraft" means, lol

In minecraft

Profound!

Updoot for good vent.

We are past laws and protocols though.

Might makes right now (in government).

You assume rules and laws matter. They no longer due.

You just wasted 5 seconds reading this.

Your welcome.

There is nothing immoral about spending money to campaign. Those laws are trying to enforce things that don't matter out of a bloated sense of "fairness".

Laws like this only hurt the law-abiding. It's just like gun laws in that sense.

Things may not be as they seen. Why does this kind of info come out now? Intentional leak perhaps. Hot air perhaps.

The Byrne account doesn't add up for me.

Alas, the devil is in the details. Impossible to make it work without tons of loopholes.

I'd say the opposite: no campaign contribution limits whatsoever! Encourages more honesty. The rich always rule anyways

It's their last chance before Trump acts.

Not anymore anymore, or like, not anymore tomorrow maybe?

Will it matter? Who knows. But it's easy to do, and puts the pressure on.

In time, we will called to more. If we can't take this easy of a step, why do we think we'll take the harder steps?