The original post is at the bottom of this post. I've included links to all of the threads so far for this topic. Unfortunately, at the moment, it doesn't seem like there is enough people interested in it for it to even make sense. I'll keep the option to everyone open to make it a reality if enough want it. I'm thinking at the ABSOLUTE MINIMUM 100 would make sense. Otherwise, it probably won't help to make or use it.
If you'd like to put your input in, you can still vote on the poll at the bottom of the post, I'll keep it open for another 24-48 hours, unless there is a massive surge in votes. If enough people voted fast enough to give the desired answer, I'll shut down the poll and get to work on it (i'll post the results again first).
POLL RESULTS
Q1: Do you like the idea of a MAGA dating service?
24 Responses: 23 Yes - 1 No
Q2: Would you actually use this service?
24 Responses: 12 Yes - 10 Maybe, would have to see it first - 2 No
Q3: Scale 1-10 How important is a service like this to you?
24 Responses: 1 1/10 - 1 2/10 - 0 3/10 - 1 4/10 - 5 5/10 - 0 6/10 - 3 7/10 - 7 8/10 - 1 9/10 - 5 10/10
Repost 3: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtGT19D/repost-3-how-many-actually-want-/
Repost 2: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtFKd1l/repost-2-how-many-actually-want-/
Repost 1: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD61ya/reposting--got-2-reponses-on-fir/
Original: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD5U4u/it-pede-here-how-many-actually-w/
Original Post: After seeing hundreds of posts/comments regarding the topic, I thought I'd finally come forward and say that I can make this a reality if people actually want it.
I'm in cybersecurity, but I spent a lot of time in college doing web development course work.
If I were to do this, it would be in a very tight nit manner that expects constant shill infiltrators. I would put in a way to verify MAGA history and to link to your patriots.win profile history for people to look at.
It would be pointless if not a lot of people would want a forum like this, so try to get other pedes to vote.
Here's the link to the poll I made:
Just got around to reading the whole executive order. So, to summarize the executive order for anyone who did not read it:
Biden did not cancel wall construction, YET. The EO is to pause construction of the southern border wall to assess how much money the government can save by cancelling the contracts, or if they can repurpose the contracted labor. The only reason it would need to be assessed is if he intends to terminate construction.
The executive order continues to say that DHS will then decide to either resume construction, repurpose the labor from the contractors, or terminate the contracts.
The executive order also says that any border wall construction being funded by congressionally appropriated funds can continue to build the wall, and any wall construction partially funded by congressionally appropriated funds can also continue to build the wall and can continue to use the non-congressionally appropriated funds within that project.
This isn't a total pause on wall construction, but almost all wall construction has been halted. Expect Biden to terminate as much as he can without having to pay extra to terminate, repurpose as much labor as he can't terminate if the contracts let him, and to let all the other contracts that couldn't be terminated or repurposed to resume construction. Also expect the funds that he redirects out of the border wall funding to go to something stupid like mask research grants and social distancing grants.
He'll stop as much as construction as he can but has acknowledged that it probably all can't be stopped.
So far I have 15/15 for yes, nowhere close enough for this to be feasible. If we have 100+ at the absolute minimum then it might be worth doing. Could you imagine using a dating service with 15 people total on it - would be a waste of time. We would need significantly more people to make this a thing.
Repost 2: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtFKd1l/repost-2-how-many-actually-want-/
Repost 1: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD61ya/reposting--got-2-reponses-on-fir/
Original: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD5U4u/it-pede-here-how-many-actually-w/
After seeing hundreds of posts/comments regarding the topic, I thought I'd finally come forward and say that I can make this a reality if people actually want it.
I'm in cybersecurity, but I spent a lot of time in college doing web development course work.
If I were to do this, it would be in a very tight nit manner that expects constant shill infiltrators. I would put in a way to verify MAGA history and to link to your patriots.win profile history for people to look at.
It would be pointless if not a lot of people would want a forum like this, so try to get other pedes to vote.
Here's the link to the poll I made:
So far I have 7/7 for yes, nowhere close enough for this to be feasible. If we have 100+ at the absolute minimum then it might be worth doing. Could you imagine using a dating service with 7 people total on it - would be a waste of time. We would need significantly more people to make this a thing.
Repost 1: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD61ya/reposting--got-2-reponses-on-fir/ Original: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD5U4u/it-pede-here-how-many-actually-w/
After seeing hundreds of posts/comments regarding the topic, I thought I'd finally come forward and say that I can make this a reality if people actually want it.
I'm in cybersecurity, but I spent a lot of time in college doing web development course work.
If I were to do this, it would be in a very tight nit manner that expects constant shill infiltrators. I would put in a way to verify MAGA history and to link to your patriots.win profile history for people to look at.
It would be pointless if not a lot of people would want a forum like this, so try to get other pedes to vote.
Here's the link I made:
Original: https://patriots.win/p/11SJtD5U4u/it-pede-here-how-many-actually-w/
After seeing hundreds of posts/comments regarding the topic, I thought I'd finally come forward and say that I can make this a reality if people actually want it.
I'm in cybersecurity, but I spent a lot of time in college doing web development course work.
If I were to do this, it would be in a very tight nit manner that expects constant shill infiltrators. I would put in a way to verify MAGA history and to link to your patriots.win profile history for people to look at.
It would be pointless if not a lot of people would want a forum like this, so try to get other pedes to vote.
Here's the link I made:
After seeing hundreds of posts/comments regarding the topic, I thought I'd finally come forward and say that I can make this a reality if people actually want it.
I'm in cybersecurity, but I spent a lot of time in college doing web development course work.
If I were to do this, it would be in a very tight nit manner that expects constant shill infiltrators. I would put in a way to verify MAGA history and to link to your patriots.win profile history for people to look at.
It would be pointless if not a lot of people would want a forum like this, so try to get other pedes to vote.
Here's the link I made:
NATO voted no; Japan voted no.
Pakistan, India, Israel, China also voted no.
It was passed by 61 non-nuclear power nations.
If the US complies do you really think China & others will comply too or will they just tell the UN to fuck off or hide the weapons?
Any predictions of what Biden is going to do?
I personally don't think Biden is retarded enough to dissemble the US nuclear arsenal - all of NATO voted no so I think it's unlikely the US will comply.
The reddit shills and retards we're always so busy trying to start shit and get their screenshot of how we're all racists, I bet they never got word of our back up links.
Either mods have the fastest deportation operation in history, or the retards think they got the site shut down and finally went back to reddit.
Either way, it's more winning.
He signed an executive order issuing a mask mandate on Federal Property, and he was not wearing a mask when around others on federal property - in violation of his own executive order.
Time for Impeachment.
"Rules for thee, not for me"
Lindsey Graham is a traitor cuck, however, our pressure is working - keep the pressure up. Lindsey Graham is also asking other GOP senators to acquit Trump and calling out Mitch McConnell's bullshit.
I will never support Lindsey Graham, but aside from the obvious, an acquittal is critical to give Trump the option to run in 2024 - if he decides he even wants to run.
"We would encourage the Secretary to switch parties. She has never been a conservative. She was a swamp creature created, funded, and supported by mainstream Republicans. She knows she can't win with Republicans because we have the time and resources to reveal everything going on in the SOS office. Leave or stay -- it doesn't matter. We're revealing everything. Her political career is over. #byefelicia"
For anyone who doesn't know, Loren Culp is the MAGA Gubernatorial candidate for WA in 2020 running against Inslee. He had the election stolen from him too. He sued the WA Secretary of State and stayed in the fight until the end. The WA state swamp is deep, and he's exposed many WA GOP swamp creatures. Including the two that voted to impeach President Trump, before they voted to impeach President Trump.
I really hope Loren Culp doesn't give up. I'm personally hoping he runs in 2022 for Rep Dan Newhouse R-WA 4th 's seat. Loren Culp is legit. He would leave the GOP without second guessing it if Trump started the Patriot Party.
Loren Culp's new PAC is The New Patriot PAC - http://www.thenewpatriotpac.com
I’m hoping we get the domain name back - but thedonald.win got to up to #405 in the United States
WE WILL REBUILD
Trump's approval rating amongst Republicans was at 97%, if Trump ceases to be a Republican, almost entire GOP voter base will follow him to his new party.
I'm looking at you RNC establishment agents lurking here, get the fuck on the Trump Train, or you'll soon be out of power too. Ask the two grifter GOP GA senators that got voted out for not fighting for Trump.
Across the board there is 500k people who watched the livestreams for the inauguration, highest from a single outlet was around 150k.
Yesterday Trump's Presidential Address got millions of views on about every platform. Even Ben Shapiro's Facebook video of it got over 3.3M.
His speech this morning (7hrs ago) got over 784k views on a single outlet.
On top of that, we already know they manipulate the view counts in their favor.
Trump's 2017 inauguration got over 10M views (per outlet) even on the fake news streams.
If Biden really won, why do only 500k (probably manipulated to make him look better) people care what he has to say?
EDIT: I forgot about RSBN. RSBN has the viewership for this morning at 3.5M Views.
Big Tech averaged +3.5% today.
Expect the Biden admin to just sweep any complaints against Big Tech under the rug.
I'm going to give a quick summary, then I'm going to have the article copy/pasted, and then finally, as always, at the bottom of the post is a link if you are skeptical that I did not get all the information copy/pasted or omitted some information.
NYT starts off the article w/ shitty journalism, says Thomas Edward Caldwell made the comment "This kettle is set to boil" and they tried to spin it as 'something'.
Mugshots of Jessica Watkins and Donovan Crowl.
Court documents said Caldwell told others on Dec 31st: “It begins for real Jan 5 and 6 on Washington D.C. when we mobilize in the streets. Let them try to certify some crud on capitol hill with a million or more patriots in the streets.”
Caldwell (66, VA), Crowl (50, OH), and Watkins (38, OH) have been charged with conspiracy to commit federal crimes. They were identified by videos on social media and all 3 had admitted being in the Capitol building to journalists.
They stayed at the same hotel. Caldwell said it was a good spot to be able to go out and look for antifa to fight. Watkins used an alias at said hotel.
Caldwell plead not guilty. Caldwell was denied bail, despite needing a sleep apnea machine, and being 66.
FBI got ahold of Zello (walkie-talkie app) recordings of Watkins: “We have about 30-40 of us. We are sticking together and sticking to the plan.”
An unidentified man said: “You are executing citizen’s arrest. Arrest this assembly; we have probable cause for acts of treason, election fraud.” Watkins responded that she and others were under the main dome of the Capitol, and another unknown male encouraged her to continue, saying this was what they “trained for.”
Charging documents noted a group dressed in paramilitary gear and Oath Keepers paraphernalia stood out for its coordination. In one video, about 10 Oath Keepers in helmets “move in an organized and practiced fashion and force their way to the front of the crowd gathered around a door to the U.S. Capitol.”
12 National Guard members have been removed from duties related to the inauguration, due to political views.
Larry Brock, retired Air Force Officer charged in Texas and prosecutor cited a Facebook post linking him to the Oath Keepers.
Criminal complaint filed Saturday against Jon Ryan Schaffer, suggests he is an Oathkeeper as well and accuses him of being violent on Jan 6th.
NYT claims Oathkeepers lie about their membership numbers.
NYT gives some info clearly scraped from Wikipedia about the group, sprinkled with some poor journalism.
Oathkeepers provided security for Jan 6th protest and a quote from Oathkeepers site: “some of our most skilled special warfare veterans standing by armed, just outside D.C.” Mr. Rhodes was in Washington on Jan. 6.
Caldwell: “We need to do this at the local level. Lets storm the capitol in Ohio. Tell me when"
Two VA police officers arrested.
WASHINGTON — In the days leading up to the Jan. 6 riot, Thomas Edward Caldwell, an apparent leader of the far-right Oath Keepers, had a message for the militia members he had organized to mobilize against Congress: “This kettle is set to boil.”
(there is 2 photos next, with the caption that was below the images, below) © Montgomery County Jail, via Associated Press Jessica Watkins, left, and Donovan Crowl.
Court documents unsealed on Tuesday said Mr. Caldwell, a 66-year-old from rural Virginia, advised the others on Dec. 31, “It begins for real Jan 5 and 6 on Washington D.C. when we mobilize in the streets. Let them try to certify some crud on capitol hill with a million or more patriots in the streets.”
Mr. Caldwell and two associates from Ohio — Donovan Crowl, 50, and Jessica Watkins, 38 — were charged with conspiracy to commit federal crimes. All three had admitted to invading the Capitol to reporters and were also identifiable in videos posted on social media.
The case revealed the first evidence of planning among a known militia group ahead of the day of chaotic mob violence. Investigators have said they are increasingly focused on right-wing extremist groups to determine whether any plotted aspects of the attack on the Capitol in advance, even as most of the rioters spontaneously stormed it.
Mr. Caldwell had advised militia members to stay in a particular Comfort Inn in Washington’s suburbs, according to messages cited in court documents, advising that it offered a good base to “hunt at night” — apparently meaning looking for antifa-style left-wing protesters to fight. Ms. Watkins apparently rented a room there under an assumed name, an F.B.I. agent said.
(Photo from Jan 6th, caption follows) © Jim Bourg/Reuters People outside the Capitol during the riot dressed in Oath Keepers gear.
Mr. Caldwell appeared virtually in federal court in Virginia on Tuesday, pledging to fight the charges against him. In arguing for release on bond, Mr. Caldwell pointed to his age as well as underlying medical issues and the threat of the coronavirus, noting that he relied on a machine at night to help with sleep apnea. A judge declined the request.
Federal investigators also recovered audio recordings of Ms. Watkins’ voice during the riot from the Zello cellphone app, which acts like a walkie-talkie, speaking to other people thought to be Oath Keepers. “We have a good group,” she said early in the riot, according to the charging document. “We have about 30-40 of us. We are sticking together and sticking to the plan.” An unknown male responded, “We’ll see you soon, Jess. Airborne.”
An unidentified man said later, “You are executing citizen’s arrest. Arrest this assembly; we have probable cause for acts of treason, election fraud.” Ms. Watkins responded that she and others were under the main dome of the Capitol, and another unknown male voice encouraged her to continue, saying this was what they “trained for.”
The group they are accused of being part of, the Oath Keepers, is a far-right militia-style organization founded by military and law enforcement veterans that professes to believe that a shadowy globalist cabal is plotting to take away Americans’ rights.
Charging documents against the trio noted that amid the generally chaotic scene as the mob started to push its way into the Capitol, a group dressed in paramilitary gear and Oath Keepers paraphernalia stood out for its coordination. In one video, about 10 Oath Keepers in helmets “move in an organized and practiced fashion and force their way to the front of the crowd gathered around a door to the U.S. Capitol.”
(Photo, caption follows)
© Susan Walsh/Associated Press The Oath Keepers was founded in 2009 by Stewart Rhodes, a disbarred lawyer who once worked as a congressional aide.
Scenes of people with military training marching shoulder to shoulder have horrified Pentagon leaders, who fear that weapons and tactics training once provided by the armed forces were co-opted. At least 12 National Guard members have been removed from duties related to the inauguration, two of them for possible links to right-wing extremist movements, Defense Department officials said on Tuesday.
(Photo from inside the capitol, showing protestors outside, caption follows)
© Erin Schaff/The New York Times Federal investigators have been looking to charge those who illegally entered the Capitol during the siege.
Others arrested in the riots have been linked to the Oath Keepers, though they have not been accused of being part of an organized conspiracy.
At a hearing in Texas last week for Larry Brock, who was photographed on the Senate floor carrying flexible handcuffs, a prosecutor cited a Facebook post linking him to the Oath Keepers. Mr. Brock, a retired Air Force officer, told The New Yorker that he had found the flex cuffs on the ground and did not intend to use them.
And a criminal complaint filed Saturday against Jon Ryan Schaffer, a guitarist for the heavy metal band Iced Earth, accused of being among rioters who sprayed Capitol Police with “bear spray,” said he has long held “far-right extremist views” and suggested that he is a member of the Oath Keepers.
The Oath Keepers — named for members’ professed intent to uphold their oaths to protect the Constitution — have no geographical center, with chapters scattered in Oregon, Montana, Florida, Texas, Arizona, Ohio, New York and elsewhere. Some of its ideology overlaps with the so-called Three Percenters, another paramilitary-style right-wing movement that seeks to attract veterans.
The Oath Keepers have a more formal structure, including bylaws and dues. Although the organization has claimed to have around 35,000 members, the Anti-Defamation League, which tracks extremist groups, estimated several years ago that its membership is more like several thousand.
The organization was founded in 2009 by Stewart Rhodes, 55, a disbarred Montana lawyer who attended Yale Law School and once worked as an aide to the former Representative Ron Paul, the Texas libertarian. Its members tend to anticipate a coming new civil war.
“It was motivated by the perception that the federal government was tyrannical and that everyday Americans needed to be ready to resist that tyrannical government when it came to the door,” said Sam Jackson, who published a book on the organization last year and is a professor at the University of Albany specializing in homeland security issues.
The Oath Keepers were involved in confrontations with the federal government over land issues in the West, including the showdown between the Bundy family and the federal government in Oregon in 2014.
And during the unrest that year after the police killing of a Black man in Ferguson, Mo., heavily armed Oath Keepers patrolled the streets and claimed to protect businesses, but discontinued after criticism from local law enforcement.
The group has also been among those who sent armed vigilantes to patrol the border with Mexico or promoted such efforts by others.
In the weeks leading up to the Capitol assault, Oath Keepers issued heated calls to action. Shortly after the election, a lengthy message attributed to Mr. Rhodes circulated on far-right websites urging volunteers to converge on Washington for a “Stop the Steal” rally. Oath Keepers, it said, would provide security, including “some of our most skilled special warfare veterans standing by armed, just outside D.C.”
While participants were instructed to remain disciplined, the message also included what it described as advice from an unidentified “patriot from Serbia,” who said in a speech transcript that Americans must replicate the uprising in his country 20 years ago that deposed Slobodan Milosevic:
“Millions gathered in our capital. There were no barricades strong enough to stop them, nor the police determined enough to stop them. Police and Military aligned with the people after few hours of fist-fight. We stormed the Parliament. And burned down fake state Television! WE WON!”
By the time plans were announced for a big rally on Jan. 6, the Oath Keepers’ entreaties had taken on a tone of urgency. An appeal for volunteers framed the event as a last chance to help “President Trump’s fight to defeat the enemies foreign and domestic who are attempting a coup.”
Followers were urged to “prepare yourselves for whatever may come. Prepare your mind, body, and spirit for battle, and above all else, prepare to STAND!”
Mr. Rhodes was in Washington on Jan. 6 — a distinctive figure with his eye patch because he lost an eye to a gun accident. He is not believed to have entered the Capitol himself.
Charging documents said Mr. Caldwell was “believed to have a leadership role” in the group. While Mr. Crowl addressed him as “Commander” in a message cited in court documents, his precise role remains murky.
Mr. Caldwell, however, appeared to think that Mr. Rhodes was doing too little to organize for the day. “I don’t know if Stewie has even gotten out his call to arms but its a little friggin late,” he wrote to Mr. Crowl, according to court papers. “This is one we are doing on our own. We will link up with the north carolina crew.”
Other charging documents identified Ms. Watkins, a bartender from Champaign County, Ohio, who was arrested on Monday, of being affiliated with the Oath Keepers. She said at the top of her account page on Parler, a social media network that attracted a right-wing following, that she is commanding officer “of the Ohio State Regular Militia,” which the complaint identified as “a local militia organization which is a dues-paying subset of the Oath Keepers.”
The F.B.I. identified Mr. Crowl, also from Champaign County, as a member of the same Ohio militia.
The F.B.I. affidavit against all three described several sightings of them in video of the Capitol riot and their own social media postings boasting of storming the building.
For example, the charging document said, Mr. Caldwell sent a picture of the riot that evening to someone on Facebook Messenger, adding, “Us storming the castle” and “I am such an instigator!” He also wrote, “We need to do this at the local level. Lets storm the capitol in Ohio. Tell me when!”
A search of Ms. Watkins’ house after the riot — she was not there, and investigators cited evidence that she and Mr. Crowl had gone to stay with Mr. Caldwell — revealed paramilitary equipment like that used in the riot and instructions to build a bomb using bleach as a primary ingredient, the charging document said.
Other well-known defendants in the Capitol attack were released on Tuesday pending trial at a five-hour string of hearings in Washington. Most were accused of misdemeanors and federal prosecutors did not seek to keep them detained.
Among those released were Adam Johnson, 36, of Florida, who was charged with stealing Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s lectern, and Josiah Colt, 34, of Idaho, who was filmed in a viral image dangling from a balcony of the Senate chamber.
Two Virginia police officers accused of breaking into the Capitol, Jacob Fracker and Thomas Robertson, were released pending trial.
Reporting was contributed by Alan Feuer, Mike McIntire, Rebecca Ruiz, Ben Protess and William K. Rashbaum.
(at the bottom of the article there was a Microsoft News Poll that follows, w/ results)
Microsoft News Poll: Do you personally expect authorities to uncover more cases of pre-planned conspiracy among far-right groups from the Jan. 6 storming of the US Capitol building?
() Yes, I do (84%) () It's possible (9%) () No, I don't (5%) (X) Other / No opinion (2%)
Here is a link to the article:
Please avoid giving MSM the traffic and ad revenue. If you accidently click the link, there is a 5 second block and then you must click to continue to the article. There is plenty of time to turn back if you accidently click it.
Obviously, fake news. It was DNC propaganda agency "Newsweek". It's 4k words of blabber entertaining a pipe dream that would never hold up, except maybe if they stacked the Supreme Court with enough judges to allow Biden to do such.
Article is below if you wanted to read it. Literally copy/pasted around the ads, to show the article to avoid giving them the traffic. If you don't trust me there is a link at the bottom that will send you to the article on their site.
"President Donald Trump issued 143 pardons and commutations on Tuesday on his last full day in office. Despite months of speculation, the president chose not to issue a pardon for himself.
The pardons were expected to be controversial and some have suggested that President-elect Biden could overturn them if they're viewed as "corrupt" or an abuse of presidential power.
One of the most high profile pardon recipients was former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon, whom many regard as the architect of Trump's political career. Bannon was facing fraud charges in connection with an online fundraiser to build the southern border wall.
Trump also pardoned Elliot Broidy, who admitted to illegally lobbying the U.S. government and was once a fundraiser for the president, and Ken Kurson, a friend of Trump's son-in-law Jared Kushner who was charged with cyberstalking in October last year.
There has also been speculation that Trump could issue "secret" pardons that might also be subject to revocation by the incoming Biden administration.
Experts who spoke to Newsweek in December argued that it was extremely unlikely that a correctly issued pardon could be rescinded.
Jeffrey Crouch is assistant professor of American politics at American University and author of The Presidential Pardon Power. He explained that there is little provision for canceling a pardon.
"A president almost never tries to take back a pardon, although an old court case called In Re De Puy describes how President Ulysses Grant successfully cancelled a conditional pardon granted by his predecessor, Andrew Johnson, before it was delivered," Crouch said.
Grant's actions may seem to set a precedent for Biden but the circumstances were complex. A properly delivered pardon, accepted by the recipient, cannot be revoked by a new president.
"More recently, George W. Bush took back a pardon from Isaac Robert Toussie and claimed he did so before it was delivered," Crouch said. "I argued in a journal article that Toussie's pardon was actually complete and couldn't be taken back."
Bush withdrew Toussie's pardon one day after issuing it in a decision that's still controversial. Toussie's father had donated $300,000 to the Republican Party, a fact that emerged only after the pardon was issued and prompted Bush's actions.
"[A]s long as a pardon is delivered, it is recognized as valid," Crouch said.
Brian C. Kalt, professor of law at Michigan State University, told Newsweek that there is little prospect of Trump's pardons being overturned.
"You can't overturn a valid pardon," Kalt said. "The only recourse would be to establish that it wasn't a valid pardon in the first place. So if Trump purported to pardon himself, prosecutors could go after him anyway, arguing that the pardon was invalid."
Trump has not issued a public pardon for himself and even the ability to challenge a self-pardon is disputed as no president has ever tried to do so. It's extremely likely that the outgoing president's pardons will stand."
Article ends w/ a photo of Trump exiting Air Force One with this caption:
"President Donald Trump waves as he steps off Air Force One upon arrival at Andrews Air Force Base in Maryland on January 12, 2021. Trump issued 143 pardons and commutations on 19 January."
Link to the Newsweek article that I that I copy/pasted from.
Again, only visit their site if you're skeptical that I actually copy/pasted the full article, we don't like giving them the ad revenue here.
If you accidentally click the link, you'll know because you'll have to confirm to redirect to their site.
President Trump's approval rating was rated that low by one lefty fake news poll, all the other fake news polls have him around where they've had him for the last 4 years.
Rasmussen has him at 51% Approval. That's higher than most of Obama's time in office, and only 3% lower than Trump's peak approval rating in September 2019. Rasmussen has his 4 years between 42% Approval Rating (during BLM peak approval) and 54% Approval Rating in late September 2019. Most of President Trump's term was rated at 48% and most of Obama's first term was rated at 44%.
If President Trump is "the least approved President", what does that make Obama? "worse than the least approved President"?
I'm excited to see reporting of Biden's approval rating. Watch it be the ACTUAL WORST. Americans don't like criminals and pedophiles in office.
Why does MSM continue to refer to Obama as "President Obama" and used to call Biden "Vice President Biden", but 9 hours before Trump's term ends, they are already referring to Trump as "Former President Trump" and Pence as "Former Vice President Pence".
There's no way that this is just a string of 'accidents'. They've been doing this shit on all platforms for 4 years.
Either it's supposed to be former, for all the ones who once were President/Vice President, or you call them all with the same title.
It's a sneaky mind game to make you think Obama, and previously Biden still had some sort of authority over us. MSM is a bunch of snakes. Just like Jay Inslee.