So...a smaller Reddit with shitty colors?

Seems like he left no other options then.

First, I really hope he gets better as soon as possible. He's a great patriot and person.

Second, I hope this doesn't negatively impact the SCOTUS case.

Is this being used in any official capacity to change the fraudulent results?

Fuck

Especially for the jackass states that passed mail in ballots into their state law. I haven't read each of them specifically, but I'd be willing to bet they didn't put a time limit on them.

That should be the new defense in court for every witness to a crime. The defense attorney should just tell the jury over and over the witness' account is "baseless".

That'll work.

The other thread talking about this said they just said the samples were "inconclusive" and it wasn't that big of a deal.

I'm not sure so I'm not gonna back up that claim. If you can find it, they linked the actual document.

This made me laugh. Thanks.

Oh yay. More "calling for".

So fucking sick of that phrase. Means about as much as me "calling for" a hummer from Kayleigh McEnany.

Earlier they were saying they were "calling" for it. Has it been confirmed they're actually doing it?

I haven't known Barnes to just blow smoke up anyone's ass.

I'd prefer the corrupt politicians first.

That's hilarious. Feel a little bad for that old lady though.

I guess what I don't understand is how when people discovered "errors" the first day or so after the election, the states fixed them. Then people kept finding error after error, including the dead voters and ineligible voters. But the states stopped fixing them. At some point in time, the officials become the ones committing the fraud when they knowingly certify results that have issues like that.

It shouldn't take a court to tell you dead people can't be counted.

Never saw that either.

"The Republican Poll Watchers were thrown off the premises" has not been debunked.

"This type of mail in voting being cured while the rest in the state are not violates the equal protection clause of the Constitution" has not been debunked. Neither you, or any cuck at Wikipedia gets to decide that. Only SCOTUS.

That's the main legal argument Rudy made to an actual court.

Dominion and the gang.

I played it.

It was shitty that I had to play through that terrible storyline to be able to play co op with my buddy. I couldn't stand playing as her, and it wasn't because she's a Muslim woman. It's because she's a terrible fucking character as far as powers etc. The idea to make me play her sorry ass just to open up co op was criminal.

I like the idea, but hesitate to rely on the judicial system to agree to this.

I would immediately have them clarify that bullshittery.

Any legal document I've ever seen requires specifics. Not vague bullshit "bad shit could happen".

That would be like writing an arrest warrant for someone and saying "He could do some bad shit later."

Yeah. This smells just like a Senate Strongly Worded Letter.

Why didn't they just pass legislative actions demanding it?

It's painfully obvious they don't.

Remember back when the media reported things and China Joe had to withdraw from a presidential race because they caught him plagiarizing a speech?

That's nowhere near as bad as the shit he's done since then, and crickets.

I think the USPS whistleblowers pretty much prove that, don't they?

I like that he pretends he has morals. The motherfucker is watching a massive fraud ring try to get him elected when he didn't earn hit. He's accepting those results knowing they're fake. That's not moral.