There's no difference. But this decree wants to make one by allowing only the former

You lost your game? Didn't you ask your father for help?

Didn't you have any proof that this game was yours?

Guys let's conserve buttsex in botswana! Prohibition is communism

Of course. There is a difference between communist censoring to gain power and hide lies, and between preventative removing of harmful opportunities.

If there was no alcohol, there wouldnt be tragedies caused by it. Prohibition didn't work out in USA, but in Europe there is no way to buy a weapon illegally and anonymously. There is difference between banning drugs/prostitution/harmful content and truth. But USA do not really care about enforcing the former, while is worryingly succesful at the latter

good point. Still I think You underestimate big media ability to subvert, people reading text labeled as editorial still can be convinced by evil

I would not call libertarians people with morals and standards. Sure, having no morals can help get your goals but I'm not talking about that. We should have morals and consider some people vurneability to being subverted. Why do you think breivik isn't allowed to speak to anyone? Some people are snakes, very likeable, charismatic and convincing

lmao with that libertarian attitude good luck doing anything in america

some books need to be burned

this is why censoring does not mean proving person censored was not wrong. Cnn among others should be censored

"Without big banks socialism would be impossible" - Vladimir Lenin

Hitler won in a democratic election

Biden did not

That is not Goebbels quote but Hugh Redwald Trevor-Rope (british)

Nazis are not commies. Dems are commies