How is this hearing going? Any highlights?
If Biden Loses these it puts him at 264, if Trump can pick these up then yes. although I think there is also a possibility that they just get decertified in which case it seems like there is an argument over whether it's 270 or the majority of the electors that do vote. In any scenario, this is what we want to be happening right now.
Although both Perdue and James could get seated possibly too? Or how does that process work? Is it possible for the Senate seats to be contested as well?
So what is the next step here?
Who is stopping people from owning/operating their own workplace?
Got this...
Ms Markson said the data was extracted from a Shanghai server by Chinese dissidents, whistleblowers, in April 2016, who have been using it for counter-intelligence purposes. “It was then leaked in mid-September to the newly-formed international bi-partisan group, the Inter-Parliamentary Alliance on China- and that group is made up of 150 legislators around the world.
“It was then provided to an international consortium of four media organisations, The Australian, The Sunday Mail in the UK, De Standaard in Belgium and a Swedish editor, to analyse over the past two months, and that’s what we’ve done”.
The NYT says it themselves..
"In three sets of testing data that include cycle thresholds, compiled by officials in Massachusetts, New York and Nevada, up to 90 percent of people testing positive carried barely any virus, a review by The Times found.
On Thursday, the United States recorded 45,604 new coronavirus cases, according to a database maintained by The Times. If the rates of contagiousness in Massachusetts and New York were to apply nationwide, then perhaps only 4,500 of those people may actually need to isolate and submit to contact tracing.
One solution would be to adjust the cycle threshold used now to decide that a patient is infected. Most tests set the limit at 40, a few at 37. This means that you are positive for the coronavirus if the test process required up to 40 cycles, or 37, to detect the virus."
https://www.nytimes.com/2020/08/29/health/coronavirus-testing.html
4-3 decision with the dude flipping?
We know his election was rigged.
This doesn't mean you can sue the government officials personally, does it?
Wisconsin Hearing
This is a sitting politician? geez
If they are reporting it, then it's noice. Need to find the signal.
I think the next move is appoint a special prosecutor.
Also I thought I saw a story today that the FBI is tracking down 500k illegal ballots. It was on the Thomas Paine podcast but I can't find it anywhere else.
Who released the rich and swalwell info?
Is this happening now?
This is from November 8th.
Is it weird that the transition team put out this press release? Also, if they are voluntarily offering up this notice, it's because they are trying to distract from something else. Maybe the Senate report, maybe something else but I don't think this is the story. This is a distraction from the story.
Kentucky should be low hanging fruit.
Agreed. But all I'm saying is Trump either planned for that or he didn't. If he didn't plan for the judiciary to be compromised then that would be a miscalculation on his part and could cost him re-election. I don't know how you plan for that but I'm just trying to understand what he didn't predict if we all believe that he was prepared for this.
I guess that's my point. Is the rejection by the judicial system expected or not? If not, then it seems like they miscalculated that element.
Valid point. Completely answers my question.
Why is this relevant? Because you think he'll bring in someone else?