Well stated.
All that is required for evil to triumph is for good men to do nothing.
Alexander Hamilton said "When a government betrays the people by amassing too much power and becoming tyrannical, the people have no choice but to exercise their original right of self-defense - to fight the government."
I hope better explanations will follow, but the basic gist is this. The social media companies are protected from the content on their platforms in the same way the owner of a physical bulletin board would be protected if someone stuck a note up on a physical bulletin board at your local grocery store. The grocery store cannot be held liable for the content of any message as long as the store does not select which messages can be posted. So 230 grants immunity as long as the bulletin board hoster is not selecting content (which would the be acting as a publisher, whole different set of rules, and 230 not applicable). The issue is the social media sites began removing content, becoming a "publsher" rather than a bulleting board, and thus no longer eligible for section 230 protections.
Walmart is one of the main drivers of China's rise in manufacturing. Did some work with a US TV manufacturer (back in the days of tube TVs, before the rise of flat screens). Walmart informed them that the price they would pay for the TVs next year was significantly less than this years price - maybe 40%+ less. The manufacturer replied "we can't make them for that" to which Walmart buyer replied "you can if you make them in China". I've heard the same story from other companies. In at least one case, the manufacturer was able to meet the price without moving production to China, and Walmart dropped them anyway, and would only carry their product again once production was moved to China.
Send a note of support to his contact page: https://www.hawley.senate.gov/contact-senator-hawley
Clearly stated in the Communist goals from 1963 (http://www.ecjones.org/1963_Communist_Goals.pdf) is a goal to orient students from hard sciences to "social sciences" which produce no economic value but create people eager to find and foster points of division in a society. Thomas Sowell discusses in his book Intellectuals and Society, how soft sciences were exploited by the Communists to sow dissention, while they focused on hard sciences.
In Trump's hands.