3
mntrump2020_SMS 3 points ago +3 / -0

oh sorry. you're not the only one, i am getting a thousand messages and honestly i just copy/pasted a response all over so people would stop messaging me the same thing about the rounding errors.

you are right that they are separate issues. good catch! thanks for looking into it! sorry about the all caps thing!

2
mntrump2020_SMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

its always some no name twitter post, too. They are just doing it to try to gain followers. I mean, they didn't even wait 5 minutes before taking a screen shot of their own tweet and posting it on their alt account.

BAN!

3
mntrump2020_SMS 3 points ago +3 / -0

its because i'm starting with zero as the counts and its to get around the divide by zero exceptions for the very first entry. plus, you know, this isn't production level code its just something i made to analyze one data set.

1
mntrump2020_SMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT ROUNDING ERRORS Why does the Trump and Biden percentages move throughout, but the 3rd party % stays at 2.1%??? https://i.maga.host/2Ym3Wv2.png Biden goes from a 70% lead to a 52% lead, Trump goes from a 30% deficit a 45% deficit. 3RD PARTY VOTES NEVER CHANGES FROM 2.1%

4
mntrump2020_SMS 4 points ago +5 / -1

FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT ROUNDING ERRORS Why does the Trump and Biden percentages move throughout, but the 3rd party % stays at 2.1%??? https://i.maga.host/2Ym3Wv2.png Biden goes from a 70% lead to a 52% lead, Trump goes from a 30% deficit a 45% deficit. 3RD PARTY VOTES NEVER CHANGES FROM 2.1%

3
mntrump2020_SMS 3 points ago +3 / -0

i made a new account because i don't want to have my real life identity tied to this one. i did a meet up on election day.

1
mntrump2020_SMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

you're not missing anything. Its a result of how the numbers are calculated. They are derived data, not actual data.

20
mntrump2020_SMS 20 points ago +20 / -0

I addressed this issue in the edit. Let me know what you think! Thanks for looking at it!

14
mntrump2020_SMS 14 points ago +14 / -0

I addressed this issue in the edit. Let me know what you think! Thanks for looking at it!

12
mntrump2020_SMS 12 points ago +12 / -0

I addressed this issue in the edit. Let me know what you think! Thanks for looking at it!

557
mntrump2020_SMS 557 points ago +563 / -6

can someone help get this sticked? TRUMP CAMPAIGN NEEDS TO SEE THIS!

edit: FOR ALL YOU PEOPLE COMPLAINING ABOUT ROUNDING ERRORS Why does the Trump and Biden percentages move throughout, but the 3rd party % stays at 2.1%??? https://i.maga.host/2Ym3Wv2.png Biden goes from a 70% lead to a 52% lead, Trump goes from a 30% deficit a 45% deficit. 3RD PARTY VOTES NEVER CHANGES FROM 2.1%

1
mntrump2020_SMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

one of the two will (I think) terminate and give an answer.

if you can prove it terminates, than you've got a solution to P?=NP there and that is a huge fucking deal!

i'm impressed!

2
mntrump2020_SMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

that would be pretty insightful if its true! the incompleteness theorem is one of those things that seems to run defense on deeper knowledge.

good luck on the riehmann hypothesis: i looked at it a few years ago and basically decided its too convoluted for me!

1
mntrump2020_SMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

naw, no fields. its a new approach. hopefully it works, because, you know, my grant depends on it, but its more about rethinking what numbers actually are than anything to do with fields. so far its working but we will see!

2
mntrump2020_SMS 2 points ago +2 / -0

nice. i'm working on normalizing the contradictions of 4+ dimensional numbers during addition and multiplication. (we assume subtraction and division are simply reciprocals of those functions and don't actually exit). its a bitch! ha ha

1
mntrump2020_SMS 1 point ago +1 / -0

above poster is actually wrong. God does not appoint all governments, only some governments. the issue is that it is very difficult to determine which is which, from the average joe's perpective.

the phrase "render unto ceasar that which is ceasar's, and unto God that which is God's" is the perfect example of this. it recognizes that the state (represented here by "caesar") is a separate and distinct entity from God.

The way to intrepret this is simple: God's law is above the laws of man. Follow the laws of the country you live in, unless they contradict God's laws, at which point you should follow God's laws. easy.

if unsure, which happens alot, actually, its perfectly acceptable to follow the laws of Man (render unto Caesar) until you gain insight into any knowledge that they contradict the laws of God (render unto God).

let me summarize:

assume the earthly governments are legitimate until proven otherwise.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›