Insurrection act is looking like the only strong play if there isn’t a strong case in scotus. And so far that does not look compelling. The legal process in state courts is clearly not working in good faith. Same story at the municipal level. There is simply too much bias and selective (partisan) application of law for the system to work as intended. And very little time remaining.
I’ve seen mention of martial law, but this alone does not solve anything without specific justification (in fact it would be perceived very negatively). There must be a clearly articulated, credible, impending threat; and a measurable objective to declare martial law. The insurrection act could provide that cover with enough context. But frankly speaking there would have to be iron clad evidence at the national security cabinet, intel agency level to provide the support and execution for something like that. Especially this late in the game. Does that exist? No idea.
Personally I think the saddest thing to witness over the last several years is the willful discarding of morals and ethics. This goes far beyond “the swamp”. It’s a breakdown of a society who has a lust for power and pleasure while rejecting personal responsibility. The corrupt appoint the corrupt.
Why do you care what they think? They hate you. No matter what you do, or do not do. Complacency led to the downfall of this country.
We are not even free people if we are “correcting” ourselves before even expressing our views due to a perceived reaction of people that hate us.
There's 2 possibilities here.
-
Your password has been compromised. Twitter has been breached several times and millions of account credentials were compromised. If you have a password manager on your machine, such as 1password, it will usually alert you if your password hash has appeared in databases like https://haveibeenpwned.com/passwords.
-
Software developers often build a platform capability known as impersonation (not to be confused with social engineering human impersonation). This allows privileged accounts to mimic the user's account experience to help developers fix bugs. If poorly implemented, it's plausible it could be misused by internal employees.
Very informative article. Shows how completely biased and compromised these agencies are. They should be sued for violation of 1st amendment and slander.
TLDR for those who didn’t read. FBI is using fusion centers in every state to notify all law enforcement agencies that people and groups that choose to leave mainstream social networks like Facebook, for alternatives such as Parler - are right wing extremists etc.
Posted this in another thread - Armed forces switch uniform flags from colored to subdued (black & white) when deployed or during field operations. Strange coincidence considering what’s going on with the recent change in secdef specops reporting structure.
Strange. First thing I thought of.
“Soldiers will wear the subdued tactical flag insignia while or in a field environment."
If you're looking for a serious answer backed by decades of policy, it is because many diplomats of previous years believed that the most effective way to counter a communist threat to the geopolitical status quo would be to engage with China through trade and culture. The belief was that capitalism and cultural influence would create an interdependence that would dissuade them from disruptive action. And in many respects this was successful. What they didn't account for, what that China would successfully create a quasi capitalist-communist hybrid, and that the process of political and cultural influence would cut both ways. This is from the government policy perspective.
From a corporate perspective the answer has always been pure greed. Higher profit margins from offshore manufacturing + 1 billion potential consumers which often didn't materialize.
I have news for you. Everything is "compromised" and always will be. There are too many people on this forum that are literally scared of "muh glowies" that they are unwilling to do anything at all in real life. Every single organization throughout history has had, and will always have undercover operatives out of necessity. Despite the entrapment schemes - Most of them are not bad guys believe it or not. It is your right to organize and assemble. Just do the right thing and don't tolerate any encouragement of unlawful activities or LARPs. If you "start your own militia" then you are going to be POI #1. So do it right. Stay focused on training and drilling (including non armed peaceful community activities). Do not allow any expression or activities that can be construed as unlawful or "an intent to act". It's really quite simple but some people get too caught up in their LARPs, and this is where LEOs will come in. You must operate as if you always have a fed in rotation and be proud of what you do because you know it's righteous and lawful.
And some of you here should consider joining up in armed forces or agencies. You can't constantly complain about them if you aren't willing to step up and serve to make things better. You will find that most of your time will be spent doing "mundane" operational activities, physical fitness, and so on. This is what makes an effective organization.
90% of being effective as a movement is being able to run logistics, intelligence, and communications.
In fact I would argue that the most effective militias could be entirely unarmed. You can see this with organizations like civil air patrol and others. They are nothing like the actual military or a militia for that matter, but they are quite effective because they focus on building operational capabilities and roles under a clear mission purpose such as supporting search and rescue or natural disasters. This is what they do have in common with the military. A clear mission purpose and operational excellence.
Thanks for the thoughtful reply, I appreciate your conviction. I agree that 99% of the bs online is LARPing. Just to make this crystal clear, I do not advocate for civil war. Nothing good could come from such a scenario, and it is unwarranted amongst the general population. Americans want peace and prosperity and are generally united despite the bombastic media and big tech bullshit. There's too much hyperbole surrounding this topic IMO.
People are emotional but do not have any clear rational objectives. Progress requires rational, strategic action towards clearly defined objectives. That's the starting point.
I suspect we have some common agreement here. Where we may disagree is in MSM optics. I believe that narrative-shapers can not be fought through appeasements. Those who create and shape narratives, drive the tip of the spear. And hence culture, politics, and social in-group/out-group signaling. Narratives are often effectively communicated through emotion, even edgelord memes. But to drive narratives you must control the medium. Fighting the MSM through optics is a lost cause. It's a weaponized medium. They are simply narrative brokers who propagate ideology-driven content from their own in-group, which is seeded by narrative creators in intel agencies, think tanks, SIGs and so on.