It's not an "argument", honey. It's Constitutional fact.
Problem is, these weak GOP legislators only see themselves as mere "policy makers" and not defenders of liberty and the Republic. They're only thinking, "how can we make this better NEXT time." None are thinking "this is a sham that must be reversed". The difference is courage. You're looking at a bunch of statist cowards.
Check the damn video, bitch! It's your damn state. Where did those ballots miraculously appear from? It's YOUR damn job to aks and answer that question, not the Colonel's.
Which of the two is more likely? Given the track record, I'm going with lazy POS.
All these sustained objections "for purposes of this prelim hearing" are simply creating a record for any appeal, if needed.
Threatended with death. Knocked down. Kicked. Beaten. Gun pointed in face. Attempts to wrest away his weapon. 100% justified stand-your-ground conduct by Kyle.
He's dead, Jim.
Jumpkick Man = Anthony Huber = Dead Pedo = JUSTICE
Lando was always a class act.
These are all Jeb! republicans.
Whenever I hear any state employee -- MY employee -- complaining about how "overworked" they are, I want to fucking explode!
State government at its best!
If you chase the rabbit long enough, you'll soon discover its a huge fucking T-Rex!
SAME. No more letting morons handle this sacred process.
In NV, they literally purchased votes. In GA, they used NBA players -- which are worshipped like gods in these communities -- to rake them in from their mindless fans.
"NBA players can't spell the name of their league, but they sure as hell can vote and donate to corrupt Dems."
Amen! It's not enough to know Trump won. The only goal is 4 more years!
BASED INDIAN BABE KILLS IT AGAIN!!!
Prediction: Bald Wakanda's "question" will be a lengthy diatribe.
EXACTLY!!! This was a government-run event. Obvious civil right violations.
Ditto. FINALLY.
Is baldy based?
This shit-for-brains cunt is spewing the typical liberal living/breathing ConLaw bullshit we see whenever ANY Constitutional issues are discussed. The actual plain meaning of the text is meaningless to them. They want the Constitution to mean however they define it under the present circumstances. One thing is certain, SCOTUS will not agree.