What you're seeing is known as "Anchoring". It's repeated chants, thoughts and actions in a very high or low emotional state, and when this happens repeatedly, whatever is chanted becames a part of their core belief system.
It's basically the same process as initiating PTSD under fight or flight. Self brainwashing to simplify.
Not one cell of the frontal lobe is operational.
Everything they are attempting is failing. States are stepping up, and the data is spreading despite attempts to stop it.
They can't really do shit if the masses just say fuck you, we're not taking it. They will not put that shit in me, nor my family.
It's just that simple.
Our oaths hold true for most, and even higher percentages in a combat MOS. It's always been that way, and most enter the military at an early age, not interested in politics until they take a little trip or two.
We also have families and seen the rage of civil war and it's effects. We absolutely don't want that in our backyards if it can be avoided.
We have states fighting back on the elections, E.O.'s and much more in the legal spectrum of this war of globalists and their minions and Patriots on a global scale. The entire world is figthting back.
Just an uneducated guess, but I would think a complete media and internet blackout would likey be a Red Line for many of the ones you're speaking of... unless there was news that the real bad guys were in trouble instead of us.
This is how I feel about it. It's a paraphrase (likely pretty close) from Kris Paronto on an Alex Jones interview in 2016, during the election cycle when they first started seeding civil war.
Alex had asked Kris about his thoughts on libs starting a civil war.
Kris paraphrased: It's all lib-talk, but hey, if you think we're just going to sit on the bench, you'd better think again, because you had better have 100 to 1 if you come at me, because that's what it's going to take, and there are a lot of "Me's" out there.
We're watching, waiting and praying it doesn't come to that step. For our family, children, friends and neighbors, for our brothers in arms and every civilian at risk. We all know that once the genie is out of the bottle, disaster awaits globally.
We're waiting because it's critically important that we do.
Think about her net worth, what she owns and controls. Information on the web does not give me a value for dollywood or any of her properties. It's estimated that she is worth 600 million, her husband about 30 million, but dollywood alone generated 100 to 500 million a year.
Dollywood was actually started as a brand in 1986, but has roots back to 1961. This is just dollywood. It does not cover her other earnings, and she's only worth 600 million?
Own nothing, control everything, including the hearts and minds of their fans and subjects.
Controlled asset.
It really is an open secret.
There have been 3 hypnotized to assassinate someone and they followed through and it's on video, but they didn't have real ammo, and the entire thing was staged to see if they would follow through.
Compliant people (agreeable as a personality trait) are much more suseptable to psycological manipulation. It's why when stage hypnotist try to hypontize the crowd, only a small number are actually hypnotized. The stars of the show are basically the most agreeable of the group.
But what if you could find a large gathering of compliant (agreeable) people, what could you accomplish in under an hour? Pay close attention to the narration and the message. If they attained that result in under an hour of having the message repeated, what kind of grip do you think the MSM has on them with their repetive messages, all day, ever day.
Robert B. Cialdini, Professor of Psychology at Arizona State University, was hired by the Obama admin, he was also working during the election cycle against Trump and who knows what else now.
Then you have the power of social conformity and social proof in the younger crowd packed on top of the personalty types.
I don't even want to breech I.Q., but logic dictates it's a huge part of the easily indoctrinated.
Last, but not least, Fear!
Fear completely overides the frontal lobe. No way to reason with them once they bought into the fear for extended periods of time. It would not surprise me if many of them don't have PTSD from their fear of this virus. I could go on, but this should bring a lot to light for some that may read and watch.
Everything is and has been controlled for many, many years.
This is good, it means a resurgence in locally owned and operated grocery and general stores.
Drop half of walmart shoppers and they crash and burn. No business that size can sustain that kind of losses for sustained periods.
Main street USA will be coming back.
That's just one intro into one chapter in a very large library of books filled with tools, tactics, and methods used to bring us to where we're at today.
Until this post, you haven't given one legitimate reference or source. Secondly, 1905 was the FIRST IQ test, what led up to it has zero bearing on reality, or history, nor the history made after.
Once again, any tool can be used for good or evil, including IQ testing. Just because someone was intelligent enough to come up with solutions to grade intelligence does not mean the science is faulty because it came out of euginics.
The higher someones intelligence, the less "disgust" they experience, so seeing a highly intelligent person become a eugenisists seems to fit the bill.
Did you miss that in psychology 101? You do understand it was psychology that gave IQ testing it's legitimatcy, right?
Lot's of research, lot's of statistics. I can't believe, as educated as you are, you didn't know the strong relation (correlation factor) between disgust and intelligence?
Maybe, just maybe you should look that up.
I gave you direct bloodlines, not a diatribe of your entire ansestory. You're the one who spoke as an absolute authority, while contradicting yourself.
If anyone is confused here, it is you, fren; biological differences in skeletal and muscular aspects have nothing to do with measuring intelligence or aptitude.
You brought up double standards mind you, and when I confront you about them, now you jump back to IQ. So, let's play your silly game.
Back to special forces in general, or we can play the Ranger route from the first one.
These operators must have both a high IQ, plus the physical power and stamina to perform their duties and obligations.
Womens frames, as a rule can't handle the shock, they don't have the ability to win in hand to hand when matched up against women and much more. We can back this with statistics. The number one killer of women are indeed men on a global scale, and you want the ability to go pick a fight with hords of them, right?
There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to measuring or discerning the mental capabilities of the sexes, but that does not mean that bias does not exist in the tests, because what is being measured itself may be the result of bias, even if it is accurate.
That was the entirety of my first post. Some are smarter than others, so moving the goal posts are not helping. Discernment is not fact based BTW.
Now more specific.
but that does not mean that bias does not exist in the tests, because what is being measured itself may be the result of bias, even if it is accurate.
Of course there is a bias. The US Military sets standards based on survival and winning conflict, nothing more. To suggest otherwise is pure, unadultrated ignorance.
There has to be a bottom or there is no standard. The basic PT test is reasonable, the standard ASVAB has served the military well. We've only lost because the game was rigged.
It's now harder for the average American to enter the military than college. You can be as dumb as a brick and get into a community college, but not so much in the military, because they have standards.
To assume a bias in these tests outside of success prove you wear a coat of indoctrinmation.
You continue to scream unequal, unequal, unequal, all the while enjoying the privilege of naming an "unknown bias" somewhere in the ether that's opressing you because you assume, hence the use of "because what is being measured itself may be the result of bias, even if it is accurate."
"May" translated: I don't have a clue, but it sounds good to me. Then you throw in "even if it's accurate".
Ya didn't think that through, now did ya?
Now, again.
There is no one-size-fits-all when it comes to measuring or discerning the mental capabilities of the sexes.
Actually, there is. We have bell curves of the data, graphs, irrefutable correlation calculations and much more just in modern psychology.
We know what men and women are prone to, and you admitted it yourself, and it's almost like we were designed for specific rolls in society. We know the IQ spreads, and women should be grateful for some of the statistics from IQ testing data.
On the bell curve, men have many more lower IQ's that women, but we also have the higher IQ's also. Men, by the numbers are both smarter and dumber at the ends of the spectrum by the numbers, where women seem to hit these highs and lows much less frequently.
And yes, modern neuro-science (used to be animal behavior scientist) know the difference between how the brain operates in males and females, but they can't tell simply by looking at the brain, or even biopsies. They are not that advanced as of now, and you're quoting pre-oil era B.S.
When was the IQ test first put together? Who invented it, why was it invented, based on what information? Dates?
The first IQ test was in 1905, after the history you are quoting and referencing. So, now you're taking "science" from an era prior, and comparing to something much more modern. Hmmm...
And yes, I know a bit about modern psychology and neuro-science.
You're so far off course here that I will not even address the rest of your not so short diatribe of you know not what.
and that there were actually FOUR different ASVAB versions.
First off, "were" should be "are".
Of course there are, just as there are many different versions of the SAT and ACT. It's also the same for state licensing test for contractors and many, many different professions.
There are pools of questions and answers for most IQ and knowledge based testing.
and that two had a greater number of technical and electrical type questions than the other two, and those ones were individually handed out to women, to drive their scores down (based on the assumption that women would not be raised to know as much in these areas compared to men)?
I've never read anything about what you're claiming, but would be interested in reading about it if you can provide proof. As a 3rd generation vet in a 4 generation family, I also have some experience long term in their systems. I was also born into it.
But, you're mad, and dismissing at the same time? First you say the military is attempting to screw women over, then project bias when anyone can pull these sections randomly. You lack understanding of how these tests work.
But what I have seen is double standards, and the lowering of standards for specific qualifications for women. I wonder why women are not stressed as physically as men? Maybe it's a biological issue? Maybe it's backed by science?
Case in point. Are women required in the military to do a full plank push up, or is it still knees?
Isen't there over a 2 minute difference between maxing out on the two mile run for women and men?
Why the preference for women when the fitness scores rank pretty high when it comes to promotions? Why the unfair advantage for women while they scream foul as you are now?
Why, with all other things being equal, women get the promotion even though they are not held to the same physical standards? How is that fair?
Men should push for mens rights... right?
So, with the new argument and combat readiness standards, women are failing at 65%. Hmmm..., but that's Okay because we can always lower the standards to appease in todays more "liberal" military, right?
Let's give the women a pass again, because that's where this is headed. There are now close to 30 females that are qualified Rangers. They met the standards, they passed.
When women step up and meet the standards, they win the tab, when they don't, they fail to qualify, just as the men.
Maybe people should see things as they are, and not as they wish they were? Your entire post reeks of double standards, lack of understanding of IQ testing, and a refusal to see reality.
Have you been practicing leftist ideology?
Where would you even get a map with IQ test results?
Google: https://worldpopulationreview.com/state-rankings/average-iq-by-state
It is still illegal for the US Military to induct anyone with an IQ below 85. What do you think an asvab is? It used to be called the AFQT before ASVAB.
Why is the GT score so important for special operations selection?
Are you aware that an IQ test can be assembled in just a few hours with common questions that become more complex as you move forward in the test?
Are you aware that IQ test results are the most accurate predictor of life successes globally?
I'm not sure how the level, or ability of an individuals thought processes to solve simple problems could be seen as "notoriously biased".
You can either solve the problem, or you can't, and everyone falls off at some point. But attempting to make it something it's not, is not going to help with the divide between right and left leaning people.
We have a precentage of the population that has IQ's so low that life is an absolute struggle for them. It's measurable, no matter who came up with the testing.
Anything and anyone can be used as neferious operators, products or equipment.
Now, cross reference that data with IQ by state. It paints a very clear picture.
It's uncanny... right?
Who cares what this double tonged traitor has to say?
If you still care about what Lindsey says, you're not very bright. He is not on our side.
There was only like 7k people watched it. That means nobody but journalists watched him.
Exactly! Hunger is a hell of a motivator.
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can “throw the rascals out” at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy.
― Carroll Quigley, Mentor to Bill Clinton.
Let's break this down.
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers.
The two party system is designed to "compromise". It is then called a "foolish idea" that is ONLY acceptable to who?
It's how countries are undone.
Each compromise takes another small hunk of your freedom and casts it into the pig pen to be torn apart and trampled under.
How do you keep the rule of law in operation when the laws are flexible and standards are negotiable?
But you forget the known end, which was clearly stated.
Things that ultimately destroy civilizations.
This issue is the death knell for America long and short term. It drives voters away. Unless we demand a return to sanity, reason, and the rule of law, absent compromise. Kiss America good bye.
There's an old country song about this with an interesting chorus; You have to stand for something, or you'll fall for anything.
Continued concessions is what brought us to this point.
Therein lies a potential problem. They've already set the narrative that it was a huge hack, and leftist are looking for dirt to be exposed.
Whoever "hacked" gab has now given the media the ability to create whatever narrative they want just by making up post and disseminating it across their networks.
Nothing has to be real fact, they can now roll with a list of huge lies and their mindless sheep will eat it up as fact.
Think about January 6th. What will they not do with this kind of opportunity?
This is a deep state PsyOp to set the staging for Biden's removal from office via the 25th amendment, just as Trump said in his last presser at the border wall.
Trump was asked if he was worried about the left trying the 25th, he said he was in no danger, but that Biden was at risk from the 25th.
Remember Nancy Pelosi laughing about fumigating Trump from the Whitehouse on CNN? Remember she said she was 2nd in line for the Presidency?
Remember Biden said on video he was dying or getting ready to die? Kamala will become president, Pelosi... VP.
It's almost like they told us what they were going to do.
This video can explain why some never see the truth.
They listened to this for half an hour.
Imagine if people received the same messages 24/7 - 365 from people they believed to be trusted authority figures?
Their entire life and perceptions of life are not their own. They are the mindless followers of they know not what.
How about we eliminate the income tax and go back to apportioned taxes like the constitution states since It's on your list to have knowledge of before being allowed to vote. Then everyone pays, but only when they make a purchase.
That's the smarter way out instead of telling half the country they can't vote. That way they feel the same pain, and will stop their bullshit voting.
The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps, of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea acceptable only to doctrinaire and academic thinkers. Instead, the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy
― Carroll Quigley - Mentor to Bill Clinton.
It's a cover story.
They are attempting to get ahead of the voter fraud just made public by the Pillow King.
I thought all but 5 of them done that two weeks ago, Jan, 6th, 2021.
How soon we forget.
Just a quick note on overpopulation. If you take every "Family" on earth and gave them 3/4 acres, it would only cover 3/4 of Australia. The rest of the earth would be untouched.
Overpopulation is a globalists cry for population control, or mass genocide in the name of "mother earth".