none of it is suppose to make sense because they completely overlooked the Observe portion of the entire scientific method considering that not a single agency in this entire world has an isolate of the actual 'virus' nor have proven that this 'virus' is what is actually causing any disease
nothing wrong with them being successful .. but when they use that success then proceed to subvert, rape and pillage .. well then it's kind of a fucking problem
Let's assume this is a real post.
Now let's assume your little dream of a civil war actually happens.
You do realize that the people who have been trying to ignore you and go on about their daily lives are literally the same people that when their contained anger is released will be unrelenting and without mercy.
You faggots have literally been larping this entire time. But, I assure you, you continue to play make-believe in the streets, it will only take a few pissed off mother fuckers that will end up mowing you down. And, once that occurs, more than likely, others will follow.
Those that are aware are ready and prepared to fight. However, we know the actual real consequences of what you faggots are asking for.
But, please do. Come to the more rural areas, fuck around and find the fuck out.
Even better would be a cop performing an abortion on a black child.
try getting out into the real world and meeting people .. finding someone online is probably going to be even harder .. and i wouldn't trust anyone on an anonymous internet forum
His numbers are actually accurate. But, since you idiots never come with source backed up material, I'll provide one to shut you the fuck down.
The comparison between counties that did and did not issue a mask mandate was between a 0.5 - 1.8% difference in case growth rates and 0.7 - 1.9% in death growth rates.
During March 1–December 31, 2020, state-issued mask mandates applied in 2,313 (73.6%) of the 3,142 U.S. counties. Mask mandates were associated with a 0.5 percentage point decrease (p = 0.02) in daily COVID-19 case growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.1, 1.5, 1.7, and 1.8 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all) (Table 1) (Figure). Mask mandates were associated with a 0.7 percentage point decrease (p = 0.03) in daily COVID-19 death growth rates 1–20 days after implementation and decreases of 1.0, 1.4, 1.6, and 1.9 percentage points 21–40, 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after implementation (p<0.01 for all). Daily case and death growth rates before implementation of mask mandates were not statistically different from the reference period.
Even after states allowed restaurants to reopen for on-premises dining, the increase of case growth rates were 0.9 - 1.1% and 2.2 - 3% in death growth rates up to 100 days after restrictions were lifted.
During the study period, states allowed restaurants to reopen for on-premises dining in 3,076 (97.9%) U.S. counties. Changes in daily COVID-19 case and death growth rates were not statistically significant 1–20 and 21–40 days after restrictions were lifted. Allowing on-premises dining at restaurants was associated with 0.9 (p = 0.02), 1.2 (p<0.01), and 1.1 (p = 0.04) percentage point increases in the case growth rate 41–60, 61–80, and 81–100 days, respectively, after restrictions were lifted (Table 2) (Figure). Allowing on-premises dining at restaurants was associated with 2.2 and 3.0 percentage point increases in the death growth rate 61–80 and 81–100 days, respectively, after restrictions were lifted (p<0.01 for both). Daily death growth rates before restrictions were lifted were not statistically different from those during the reference period, whereas significant differences in daily case growth rates were observed 41–60 days before restrictions were lifted.
Source: https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7010e3.htm
Mind you, these numbers are associated with the official numbers provided by the CDC driven by their wonderful (totally not being facetious) diagnostic guidelines along with the 94% of deaths associated with multiple other comorbidities. So, realistically speaking, the difference made by wearing any kind of face mask virtually made absolutely no difference in the number of cases/deaths, IMHO.
But, since I'm feeling kind of nice and already had this bookmarked.
Do some actual research so that when you send a rebuttal you'll actually know what the fuck you're talking about.
I don't give any money to any of those brands anyways. Looks like my work is done here.
Spend every moment with them as if it were the last.
Emphasis on maybe.
this deserves a sticky icky
you should have declined .. i was in the hospital for a surgery on my foot .. never put on a mask and declined any tests for covid .. for 4 days
Either tell her to fuck off OR just show up unannounced.
And if he loses?
Also, watch and share this video. Will change your perspective entirely.
Just go take a look at the VAERS database (vaers.hhs.gov) and have them do the same. The stories you read may be shocking (not to me) but just might give you enough ammunition to convince whoever it is that they have no right to shame you for not wanting to take any risk.
From the math that I did when evaluating the number of people that will experience adverse events from any of the 3 vaccines in the U.S. (with less than 1% reported to the VAERS database) 1 in 20 people will experience an adverse event and 1 in 430 people will die within the first 30 days of being administered the vaccine.
Of course those numbers are not concrete and will change as time goes on but just to put that into perspective, according to the CDC 6% that died from covid had no comorbidities, so if you're healthy only 1 in 925 people will die from covid.
So, the odds of dying from being vaccinated as compared to dying from covid are almost twice as high. If he, or even you are unsure of these numbers, I would implore you or anyone else to analyze the data themselves.
I hope he didn't take the Jab. Stay strong and all will be alright.
i would like to personally say, fuck you