1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

This isn't a criminal case (yet). She can likely prove it to be almost certainly true, but to make such a specific claim would lead me to believe they have very specific evidence.

2
msl0727 2 points ago +2 / -0

Can anyone please link me to salty liberal threads, I'm feeling thirsty.

1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is fake. I'm a biden insider (for the gullible: not really) too and the only thing we've been doing lately is shredding evidence.

4
msl0727 4 points ago +4 / -0

Set them up. Ask them about covid and they'll claim they use science (no they don't), pivot to... "well then let's look at the proven science behind the fraud in the 2020 election..." haha

2
msl0727 2 points ago +2 / -0

No, she straight up said she won't give all the juicy details, but she's got them and here's a nibble.

1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is an open threat from a defined terrorist group. Fuck em up, Mr. President

1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

Right, and I didn't mention it because it is irrelevant. Haha

But yeah, they certainly spent a pretty penny to acquire the patent, and I'm sure they did it for a reason (intent of use).

1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

haha Scented Antifa logos that only work when submerged. Perfect!

6
msl0727 6 points ago +6 / -0

Had he said, "Does anyone know if plain-text is editable" you probably would have got the joke, but he was basically teasing about how obviously insecure it is.

4
msl0727 4 points ago +4 / -0

As someone who has a patent (so I'm a little familiar), they don't really prove anything when reviewing a patent, they only look to see if it's not been done before. So you could invent scratch and sniff stickers for under water and they'd likely grant you approval.

2
msl0727 2 points ago +2 / -0

Not in a "personal capacity", but she's important to him and all Freedom loving Americans.

7
msl0727 7 points ago +9 / -2

Because the plan is for him to not be her client in her upcoming fraud case

1
msl0727 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow... since you're the expert. Tell us all you know with certainty. She's very much so a massive piece of this puzzle and I highly doubt enough changed to take her out of this game. It would likely be strategy but you don't care, because you're just a trolling shill. Am I right?

1
deleted 1 point ago +2 / -1
view more: ‹ Prev