Even if they aren't nefariously programed genes, who knows what this will do to your immune system for the next coronavirus strain. The pre-gene therapy attempts at vaccinations only made coronavirus strains more deadly (antibody-dependent enhancement if I understand the science correctly) which is why I'd want to see longer studies to see how subjects react to other variants.
Hey, maybe they have this shit figured out because I'm just a layman on the internet and not a virologist and it would be weird for them to overlook this. But with how terribly our government and medical institutions have handled COVID-19, and weighing the risk vs reward (99.9% survival rate with a known virus vs unknown longterm effects), I'm sitting this one out.
If you're streaming Scrubs, they've removed some episodes for racial insensitivity.
You put forward your radical idea like Vaccination Passports, which you want but know the public will object to. Then you say, "Okay, let's compromise" and then we get stuck with a Vaccination Database where you can't visit your mother in a retirement community, get certain jobs, or travel internationally if you aren't cleared in the system.
I've been waiting for COVID to begin for over a year now. I was told people would be dropping dead in the streets and hospitals would be overflowing past their usual flu spikes.
Does any politician actually write their own tweets? We had Trump, and maybe Rand Paul... that's about it.
That's the point of Critical Theory, it divides everything into oppressor vs oppressed categories. The reality of the situation doesn't matter, and you can substitute anything in for maple syrup. As long as they create some kind of outrage, even if the new issue is self inflicted, then it's working as intended.
He breaks down persuasion techniques like nobody else and has some interesting takes on issues that I enjoy hearing. But he doesn't have insider knowledge in any particular field other than comic strips, isn't especially America First politically, and can have an ego.
I hope not because we all have friends and family who trusted that this vaccine was safe and necessary from the experts and MSM social pressure.
I personally feel safer not taking untested gene therapy for an average coof, and wouldn't be surprised if unintended (or intentional but hidden) long term side effects come from this when 90% or more of the population will be injected with altered mRNA.
They'll get J.K. Rowling'ed, blacklisted and shunned.
Exactly. I'm a big fan of electric vehicles over gasoline, but at the same time it's impossible to power a city on renewable energy, let alone an industrial city, and definitely not our automotive infrastructure if everyone made the switch off of combustion engines.
Nuclear solves almost every problem, which is probably why the powers at be hate it so much.
My thinking is A.) Covid isn't serious unless you are old or otherwise unhealthy, and in that case you already have a high rate of mortality without an incidental covid infection so the real impact of the virus isn't clear. We know they've been inflating the numbers and seriousness of the virus for a year now.
And B.) I'm skeptical that gene therapy vaccines won't include some other unintended changes in our bodies as the long term side effects are unknown. It's entirely possible that someone in a position of power inside the government or a medical lab could intentionally add other nefarious changes "for our own good" without telling us. Real dystopian science fiction scenarios where the elites feel like there's too much toxic masculinity and attack testosterone production in men, as one example. Or that dropping birth rates in the West are still too high so they intentionally lower fertility.
While I think the likelihood of those those scenarios are low and I feel like Alex Jones for even bringing it up, they are more likely to happen than me dying from the coof. Our government has a history of treating citizens like guinea pigs with things like Tuskegee Experiments or MKUltra so I'm not comfortable giving them the power to make medical decisions for me.
We used to identify those parents accurately as suffering from Munchausen Syndrome by proxy. Now it's a hate crime not to let little Timmy transition because his mentally unstable mother wants to feel special.
He's playing politics with science. The media decided cloth masks would stop the virus and anyone not wearing one was killing grandma, governors hopped on this fear bandwagon too with mandates, and instead of correcting them he just changed health policy instead.
The science on cloth masks was settled in 2019. They work great to prevent droplets in areas like surgery where doctors are highly disciplined not to touch their face and remain sterile, but in no way could they be worn by the general public in day-to-day activities without cross contamination.
They intentionally lost the majority and aren't even pretending to fight against the DNC agenda anymore.
The one making an assertion needs to back up the claim. That's how it works.
Stop reading internet tabloids telling you what you want to hear just for views.
He was reading a prepared teleprompter speech, so there was probably a cue that read "[wait for applause]" and when it didn't happen it threw his impaired mind for a loop.
It could be a slip of the mask showing his contempt at being there, or it could be a terrible attempt at making a folksy sounding blue collar joke if I wanted to give him the benefit of the doubt. But the crazy thing is, they don't even have to defend his intent like you'd expect from politics where people give your words the worst literal interpretation they can. This entire clip gets memory holed and they can claim it doesn't even exist and we're crazy to even suggest it happened.
Even if you don't think it was politically motivated, it seems clear that Fauci reacted to the public hysteria and constantly changes policy based on that, which is not scientific in any way.
If Trump denounced Q, how many posters would be saying it's all part of the plan to distance himself from the real movement? I don't know if it's a LARP or a PSYOP, but clearly it's false hope that kept people from taking grassroot action when we needed it the most.
Just seems like your average, mentally ill individual doing crazy things for attention. The FBI will make him say whatever they want him to say.
The worst thing a SJW feminist could do is look pretty and deal with toxic "male gaze" and "eye rape". They want to look unattractive to spite men.
The big thing is taking control of entries so anything other people post, even if it's objectively fixing a mistake, gets undone. And because the cybersquatter is a senior editor (somebody who sits on their computer 16 hours a day monitoring Wikipedia entries) they can do whatever they want inside their little kingdoms.
Progressives even do edit events where they get together and make random pages more politically correct, and obviously anything political gets rewritten by Correct The Record or whatever the DNC calls their internet misinformation team these days. It's not bad looking up physics or math type of articles, history is hit or miss, but anything remotely political is pure biased garbage.
Very few people have the financial leverage that Trump has. Once you try to buck the system, they come at you and your family from ALL directions to destroy your life. Things are that bad you need to be a literal billionaire to be a Washington Outsider.
GameStop? They're already dead, but the corpse has been weaponized to kill the Wall Street vultures.
DNC is lobbied by "renewable" companies, and the RNC is lobbied by Big Oil. Nobody lobbies for nuclear power because there's no money in solving the problem.
YouTube censorship was enough to make anyone bail from the platform, I can't blame him for that. But instead of moving to a growing platform like BitChute that allows free speech and posting clips on YouTube as normal, he jumped into bed with another Progressive Big Tech company because they could pay him $100 million.