Eric Coomer,PhD, Dominion voting systems, head of strategy and security, owner / w patents, was heard firsthand on an Antifa call: "Don't worry about the election, Trump's not gonna win. I made ------g sure of that!", & more. Counts with these machines must be immediately decertified and taken personally.
https://thedonald.win/p/11Q8lVQNyC/eric-coomer-dominion-voting-syst/c/
VickiKAG, I voted for Reagan in 1976 against Gerald Ford. Ford won that primary and then lost to Carter in the general. Then joined Tea right after Santelli's rant about Boston tea party.
I too am so proud to see the new blood. They're fierce. Legions of them too. The torch has definitely been passed.
How refreshing to hear a General say "I guarantee you it's not going to happen."
Gen. Tom McInerney on the Deep State Voter Fraud Operation
22 minutes, worth it
https://ccnationalsecurity.org/gen-tom-mcinerney-on-the-deep-state-voter-fraud-operation/
I only had 1/2 evening of cold sweats. Tested positive the next day. Took quercetin, zinc, D3, etc., and Ivermection. Car got waxed, grass cut, tree limbs trimmed, patio painted, 10 mile hike, while waiting for the avalanche of symptoms - keep list on fridge. 20 days later tested positive for antibody.
The FDA is holding things up intentionally. Check out RLF-100 or leronlimab (both therapeutics). Amazing stuff. cytosorb already had EUA from FDA for COVID, yet you never hear squat from media. Go see for yourself.
Has every part of our gov't been corrupted? Seems that way.
Please, would somebody refute this, from Larry Schweikart.
I am not a Doomer. Is this guy?
-
The challenge is not to show there was fraud. Anyone with a brain knows this.
-
The challenge is to prove it in such a way in our electoral process that one of two things happen: either a judge removes ballots gained illegally from Biteme's total, or
-
contd . . . a state legislature is so convinced that the overwhelming fraud resulted in an election so deeply flawed it would have had a different outcome beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
The first is incredibly difficult. Judges do not take votes off the board.
-
Recounts can. But usually not many. In Bush v. Gore the recount process actually ADDED to Bush's total. Other recounts have had similar results.
Worse, a recount only recounts fraud.
- So now you're down to hoping to convince a judge to stipulate a strict series of remedies, including a re-canvassing, a hand-recount, and throwing out specific types of ballots (no signatures, for ex).
Sorry, I just don't see this happening. 6) What I'm saying is that while there may be a very clear strategy by Trump's team, I'm not seeing how they plan to remove about 300,000 votes from Biteme's total.
-
The PA case will not do that. It may take 10,000.
-
Even if judges "think" the giant computer fraud case has merit, they are limited in the remedies, and therefore I think (hope I'm wrong) you'd need a dozen judges basically all going the same way.
-
In short, I think evidence abounds and yet I am skeptical that Trump's team has a way to focus it like a laser into actually getting Biteme's fraudulent votes off the board.
Hope I'm wrong. Clock is ticking. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805712353771520.html
Stressed out in Ga.
Please, would somebody refute this, from Larry Schweikart.
-
The challenge is not to show there was fraud. Anyone with a brain knows this.
-
The challenge is to prove it in such a way in our electoral process that one of two things happen: either a judge removes ballots gained illegally from Biteme's total, or
-
contd . . . a state legislature is so convinced that the overwhelming fraud resulted in an election so deeply flawed it would have had a different outcome beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
The first is incredibly difficult. Judges do not take votes off the board.
-
Recounts can. But usually not many. In Bush v. Gore the recount process actually ADDED to Bush's total. Other recounts have had similar results.
Worse, a recount only recounts fraud.
- So now you're down to hoping to convince a judge to stipulate a strict series of remedies, including a re-canvassing, a hand-recount, and throwing out specific types of ballots (no signatures, for ex).
Sorry, I just don't see this happening. 6) What I'm saying is that while there may be a very clear strategy by Trump's team, I'm not seeing how they plan to remove about 300,000 votes from Biteme's total.
-
The PA case will not do that. It may take 10,000.
-
Even if judges "think" the giant computer fraud case has merit, they are limited in the remedies, and therefore I think (hope I'm wrong) you'd need a dozen judges basically all going the same way.
-
In short, I think evidence abounds and yet I am skeptical that Trump's team has a way to focus it like a laser into actually getting Biteme's fraudulent votes off the board.
Hope I'm wrong. Clock is ticking. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805712353771520.html
Please, would somebody refute this, from Larry Schweikart.
-
The challenge is not to show there was fraud. Anyone with a brain knows this.
-
The challenge is to prove it in such a way in our electoral process that one of two things happen: either a judge removes ballots gained illegally from Biteme's total, or
-
contd . . . a state legislature is so convinced that the overwhelming fraud resulted in an election so deeply flawed it would have had a different outcome beyond a reasonable doubt.
-
The first is incredibly difficult. Judges do not take votes off the board.
-
Recounts can. But usually not many. In Bush v. Gore the recount process actually ADDED to Bush's total. Other recounts have had similar results.
Worse, a recount only recounts fraud.
- So now you're down to hoping to convince a judge to stipulate a strict series of remedies, including a re-canvassing, a hand-recount, and throwing out specific types of ballots (no signatures, for ex).
Sorry, I just don't see this happening. 6) What I'm saying is that while there may be a very clear strategy by Trump's team, I'm not seeing how they plan to remove about 300,000 votes from Biteme's total.
-
The PA case will not do that. It may take 10,000.
-
Even if judges "think" the giant computer fraud case has merit, they are limited in the remedies, and therefore I think (hope I'm wrong) you'd need a dozen judges basically all going the same way.
-
In short, I think evidence abounds and yet I am skeptical that Trump's team has a way to focus it like a laser into actually getting Biteme's fraudulent votes off the board.
Hope I'm wrong. Clock is ticking. https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1327805712353771520.html
Yes, they have https://www.distributednews.com/474016.html
The politicians do not want to go to prison.