No that's English, I'm saying you actually said the same thing I said. You're right to raise the challenge that it's ambiguous if it's really a leak or not.
Assuming something might be so means the same as to entertain the possibility. You've not switched from the original premise. It's not the same as assuming something is so.
assume + might means that same as that.
I'm going to be honest, this is one of those accidents that has a good outcome. One less waste of life out there making life a misery for everyone else.
Scumbag lives don't matter. If anyone thinks I'm mean and nasty tough if you don't want to get on the wrong side of me don't be a scumbag. Scumbag lover lives don't matter either. Just don't care what happens to ya.
Is it only me and that cop with the ridiculous moustache that finds this whole scene funny? It's the best bit of farce and slapstick I've seen in a while.
Has anyone found who the cop is? Is she hot?
I wouldn't recommend watching non-white conservatives on youtube. It's nothing personal against them. It's just I've figured out the algorithm over a year ago.
They have audience analysis and audience segments. Two of this disparate audiences are left and right. They each consume a different set of products.
For the conservative segment they are wiping out the supply. Banning and censoring essentially anyone who caters to that audience.
With one exception. Non-whites, women or gays are far less likely to be censored. It's a controlled market or basically a walled garden.
I'n not going to watch any videos on youtube frankly. I'm not going to entertain a platform that is in violation of the Equality Act even if they keep a few good people around just because of their skin colour. I am certain that if a white man had posted the same video, poof or some kind of shenanigans to penalise it.
The platform can rot. She should post to a different platform. All conservatives on youtube should post to a different platform.
It might be speculation but you should always assume a leak might not be a leak.
This is also roughly where all of Russia's strategic nukes are aimed at.
He current shirts says "I have AIDs."
Really piss them off saying she needs to be criminally charged like a man would be and sent to prison for ten years.
I sometimes wonder if I'm in some kind of quarantine because sometimes I go insane.
If there is some manual intervention or mode I would posit it's post specific because the post is rising rapidly over the threshold from the rising bucket to the hot bucket.
A bad cache implementation could keep a stale view if it is treating TTL badly and refreshing each hit on high traffic so it never renews. I doubt it though.
Trump will only have so many available options for a position. The pool is dirty.
Watch the Babbit videos carefully and go through with a fine tooth comb. Coins how many people smashing the doors are distinctly white and how many are in plain cloths. Count the number of SWAT behind them. Count the number of people behind them with sophisticated cameras rather than just potato phones. Also consider BLM Sully had a smart phone and was working with CNN. Now look at the corridor behind the cameras and the Trump supporters. Count their characteristics.
What I see is a single Trump supporter between BLM, the paparazzi and SWAT.
They're a big part of it. We live in a society with high convenience thus dependence and they're doing the opposite of what they are supposed to be doing. It would be like if you trusted your GPS system but one day it starts giving random directions for a laugh.
I do think a substantial part of the problem is in the public conscious and what they will or wont allow the police to do.
They'll allow the police to act against their interests and won't allow them to act in their interests.
The average member of the public isn't raised in an environment like mine where it's not all lollipops and care bears. Most of them are raised on Hollywood which gives unrealistic expectations.
What do you think of when you hear sex trafficker?
The sex trafficking involved isn't really what people think off either when they think of sex trafficking. In this case it's more of a technicality. It's not like a bunch of dirty battered women chained up in a box in a truck without proper sanitation or sustenance.
Reminds me a bit of Assange's so called rape charges where everything is rape these days or with Kyle Rittonhouse when they were making it a big deal that he "crossed state lines with a weapon" making you think that he went out of his way or something when he was just going ten miles between work and home.
He got caught unaware because instead of her coming in and restraining the side he'd left free she does some weird thing, takes a card or something, then goes for the arm but too late.
Biker cop cracks me up the most, his response to the two diversity hires. She's the one that really goofed up though.
If you're going to try to explain this to leftists, consider what you're really arguing.
You might think this is a did it happen or didn't it argument. Arguable speaking the only truly valid position is to be agnostic.
I would not try to convince to the left that it did happen. Instead that they can't know that it did, which is true.
We have suspicions and probable cause but lets stick to what we know including what we don't know. We started with the latter. Now onto the former.
What we know is what they are doing is a cover up in plain sight. We don't know if it was or wasn't stolen for certain.
We know that they're not actually simply saying that it wasn't stolen. They're saying because of this you're not allowed to investigate what happened. You're not even allowed to run an investigation that could demonstrate it wasn't stolen.
For example, there is currently an audit being obstructed. That's something you know is happening for certain. That's a fact. If it wasn't stolen then that can do no harm. It's entirely redundant.
If it was stolen then that would prohibit you from finding out. So that is what is happening for real. We're making it unlawful, potentially criminal to try to find out if an election was stolen.
The argument here isn't for whether an election was stolen or not but whether you're allowed to believe whether it was stolen or not based on whether it was stolen or not. They're using a pseudo logic that there's an absolute presumption of innocence and therefore investigation should be prohibited.
That's the only thing that can achieve. Whether this election was stolen or not the damage is already done at this point. That in the clear and in the open.
The result of that is not one stolen election. That establishes the standard to allow all elections to be stolen.
It's a foul assumption that he has so many options to pick.
She's saying taser three times thinking that will summon it because her mind isn't clicking. I'm surprised she didn't say control z control z afterwards.
They said tasers were non-lethal. They lied.
They're criminal gangs and treating the police as the same. When you have a lawless society like that you join a gang for protection. The protection isn't in the form of bodies guards but basically if you do anything to one of theirs then their gang will retaliate.
The rules to this don't care about things like self defence. If one of your gang is hurt or killed then that's it, you retaliate, doesn't matter the circumstances.
People have it completely wrong on policing in these case. You can't police these people like you can with normal civilians.
Ironically you actually need to be brutal. You would for example wipe their entire gang out when they retaliate. Modern society isn't equipped for handling barbarians that revert back to the kind of tribal mentality it will not have had to deal with in living memory.
It's possible they prune and optimise some content. Things rising to the top is semi curated for example. If the cache is broke then it will show a version frozen from an hour ago with no comments showing up.
You notice the cache sometimes because new comments will take a while to be added to the public view. It's also possible they sometimes buffer comments for approval first to pre-moderate but I doubt they really do that much.
However there is some oddness in this case. It might be a bug. Perhaps ask the mods. In one of the comments the context appears to jump to the wrong parent node and a different comment thread.
I would speculate that if the thread was getting bombed with some over the top stuff that it either triggered or was put into some kind of safe mode. Probably not though. Best way really would be to ask.
The only distinct liabilities I see in this one is the female police officer and the perp.
If you examine the situation carefully and think about it, well the perp isn't going to make things easy so there's that but if you look at what the woman does she's counter productive in multiple steps.
First she fails to come in and assist grabbing the perp from the side his arm is free on with the officer expecting to be covered from that end but isn't.
It continues along that trend. Even when he's going to pull him out of the car she's basically shoving him aside. She's clearly useless and should not be in close proximity or tense situations.
Is she were still in her prime I'd shoot her with my accidental discharge.