Positive discrimination. Pain technicians. In 100 years it'll be gudrape, bestmurder, fundeath, freedomslave.
This is particularly observable in the medical industry. Notice in the Floyd trial how they can't just say things up front like "his heart stopped". They talking gangsters talking in code. Whole industries like that.
I never understand why in these cases they don't just ask people to speak in English. If I were the defence in a case like that I would be all like, English motherfucker! It's really weird. Why aren't people looking around at each other and asking why isn't he speaking in English?
Academia is filled with it. It's esoteric and cryptic on purpose often. People basically making another language on purpose to keep out competition. Like a paranoid or selfish guy writing all his notes backwards and stuff. Who was that ancient scientist that did that?
Trying to horde secret knowledge to themselves. Lots of reasons for it. I think people often misunderstand the tower of babel sometimes. Humans like to speak in code for often somewhat nefarious purposes.
Normally they are jealous or something and like to hide things from people but leftist detestable soulless scum whose existence is a pox to existence itself like to twist language to actively make you say things they want you to day. They don't respect your property. They think they own you. They think you are their slave. That's not your mouth, that's not your speech, it's theirs.
It's really about backup. They're arguing with you and always making up invisible people on their own side. Bringing all their mates against you. You could blame people for doing that with God but these days I tend to find Christians are more humble. At least they appreciate that they have to resort to the concept of something all knowing in recognition they are not. Science for them is something they can use in namesake off the top of their head to simply insist on having it their way but it's not science, it's them.
To really understand anything in science takes a lot of time researching, sometimes doing your own science, thinking logically, etc. A lot of these people don't realise what they call science is really just word on the street.
Also this article presents some additionally horrific scenarios I've not seen or considered before.
There are a lot of times where people don't really bother to think about things until asked. For a few witnesses I might expect that but it's clear the prosecution is in on it as well and that's beyond the scope of traditional human folly. That falls into the category of malice, clearly deliberated.
When you have a prosecution and witnesses they would question them from both angles like the defence would. They are meant to cross examine themselves.
It's basically the job requirement for prosecutors to be above this kind of thing. They're trained that way or supposed to be and that ability is meant to be what the qualification represents.
I think people need to uphold standards. Dirty tricks to win an argument or in this case a case should not be tolerated in the legal system. In this case they are throwing their full weight at Chauvin and can't even with their best resources on the job qualify/disqualify their own witnesses?
I'm scientifically minded and I've pointed out quite a few people wrong on certain positions such as that it changes your DNA (in an upfront fashion).
However, I always assume I'm an idiot and argue from there. Alright it's RNA and it's akin to gene therapy but supposedly temporary and it happens just slightly downstream of DNA which is usually a one way process (DNA -> RNA -> Proteins for example).
But just because I don't know of a method where that can happen in reverse doesn't mean their isn't one. The first elephant in the room though is that alright humans are DNA based as the master record but what about persistence of the RNA, the lifelong impact on training the immune system and most importantly other RNA organisms in the body? They can surely pick up the spike protein as well.
Most interestingly there is a particular RNA organism that does the process in reverse, retroviruses. It's literally why they're called that (retrograde, like an orbit, reverse, counterclockwise). They can convert RNA to DNA and implant it along with our own DNA.
I don't know is a very important approach to finding out, which I did. Now I troll leftist filth saying it can end up in your DNA then when they accuse me of not being scientific and a conspiracy theorist I just whip out some documentation on things like retroviruses and they have to suck my balls.
The guy who shot up that brothel had one. Makes them look like Nazis. The funny thing is I keep seeing the haircut in association with feminism and progressive creative industries.
Catholics are often slaves to a corrupt institute. Those who rise up the ranks tend to be of the same type.
The Catholic institute doesn't represent real Christianity. Take a page from the bible and recognise when they aren't living up to their religion.
Don't make the mistake of thinking the proper religion is the first thing they said then oppose the second thing.
They'll say anything they want and were doing it in the first place so you have to reevaluate everything.
The Catholic church still does damage to Christianity today. I'm not a huge expert in it but it's often clear to see when they carry misconceptions from long ago when no one could read and only a few of their agents had literacy so people couldn't check for themselves what the book really said.
At the centre of the Catholic church and what people like Biden really see in it isn't the religion you think of. It's the power, the continuation of the authority of the Roman empire.
Things like them really just being a tax man but deceiving people that it's charity. It's a nasty institute.
It's also much like the institute of science today. It's really all about power and authority. If you read what the science actually says it's very different.
Sooner or later we're going to have to confront the fact that evil will seek to come to roost at the top of any tower.
The defence doesn't really have anything to prove at this point. Proving innocence is really beyond requirement.
It's gotten ridiculous because the prosecution is trying to make out like it's impossible for anything else to have killed Floyd which is a desperate reach.
It betrays the prosecution's malice once again. Their position is absurd. Completely throwing the established lethality of intoxication and health ailments out the window. As if cops are the most deadly thing when nothing could be further than the truth.
The prosecution is knowingly using fallacious persuasion tactics on the jury that can convict an innocent man. If I were dictator I'd interject and have them all publicly executed for their crimes as a warning to other officials who are corrupt in their duty.
Polite racists those are the worst ones.
Diagnosis like this can't be reliably made at a distance. Those are educated guesses. That's really what this gets at. You'll have a witness on the stand that appears to be reasoning, ruling things in and out but if you ask just a few questions then boom permutations explode and he don't know shit, he's not a miracle doctor that can diagnose someone at a glance like House or something.
Germany did systematically disarm and eliminate all of their political opponents.
Biden as a Catholic wants to reverse when Catholics were excludes from bills of rights to exclude all other denominations.
Try nfghhvlfn. Might be a word.
I have a copy of that book but I have to be honest I haven't read it yet because it's preaching to the choir. I wouldn't assume everything in it is entirely correct but it's on the right track as a cursory glance into what science and sociology is supposed to be studying to get a more accurate picture and test different theories.
The elephant in the room is that the supreme doctrine politically and institutionally is that biological essentialism doesn't exist. We're all ruled by a cult that isn't really any different to geocentrics, flat earthers, creationists and many others in their abject denial of tangible reality.
In the study of systemic racism which is a real thing at least ~95% of it can be traced back to this pseudoscientific dogma.
It's a particularly stubborn faith. It exists swimming in an ocean of overwhelming scientific evidence to the contrary. We see that it is selective. It will happily espouse all the benefits of higher melanin but will skirts over any benefit bestowed to white people.
At its foundation it's a nonsensical theory. That everyone comes off the production line like robots the same except a different pain job. In the 70s during the civil rights movement it was popular with liberals trying to prove their theory raising chimps as humans expecting them to turn out the same making planet of the apes for real but instead making them the laughing stock of onlookers.
Biden should think this through as a Catholic.
Intrinsically the left want rationing everything out and they also want to wipe out half the population because then they get double.
Typically the underlying drivers of socialism aren't noble but just as selfish as those who might abuse any other system for gain including capitalism.
One of the things the left always ignores is that for example when people are supporting BLM it might be because the people who have the biggest problem with the police in a normal society are criminals.
Similarly they fail to account for that the people who are supporting Marxism is might be because the people who have the biggest problem with ownership are thieves.
Policing and ownership can themselves become problematic in certain situations but when you have people coming out against what they claim to be a problem with those you need to be very careful about where they're really coming from.
NK is also not really a huge amount of land it's more just its strategic location. The Japanese poured in through NK.
The funny thing is if North Korea did collapse entirely it's not China you have to thing about. What happens if a human wave of a couple million refugees all pours over the DMZ into South Korea?
The more immediate issue is strategic. It's a standoff. China doesn't want the US taking North Korea as much as the US doesn't want China taking South Korea. People forget that the 70 year ceasefire in Korea isn't just between North and South but that the war was between US and China.
The situation isn't as simple as the press makes out. It's a strange thing but people seem to write off the chaos after WWII and forget that the USA and China have been at war in the region.
Prosecuting an innocent man is incitement to riot.
He isn't guilty. What you mean is found not guilty.
Open letter, behind paywall. Sucks balls.
Black people in the US are around 15% of European descent on average.
I'd suggest a good proportion of that is from slave owners.
If I do one such on the case the results are bombed out with headlines like that the prosecution has a slam dunk case. This is patently untrue. They've already gone into this with a less than weak case, more of a dead on arrival case given that evidence exonerating Chauvin has been publicly available mostly since around ten months now.
If the jury acts properly it'll acquit. The question you really have to ask is what is the psychological impact of people invested in this case and that trust the media? I'm already starting to see signs of disturbance and despondency in people on the left following the case. I think they should be allowed to sue the media for psychological abuse.
Most journalists don't have a clue what they're talking about when it comes to North Korea.
Ordinarily, we might say “let them rot.” But China’s nightmare would be a collapse in North Korea leading to a massive exodus of hungry, desperate people. And it remains to be seen if Kim could stay in power if everything went south. That suggests a military coup.
This for example is grade A bullshit. They always repeat it when it's blatant upfront nonsense. North Korea has a tiny population, 25 million. It's not like they're all going to get up and march into China. It's also not like China can't control the border or do what it likes with let's say more realistically a few hundred thousand to couple million people. China does stuff on that scale par the course. If it wants it can put them all into labour camps or basically no different to North Korea. It's not a country that really have a problem absorbing or dealing with a couple million. It has a population of 1400 million.
That paragraph is just butchered. They keep repeating that crap going back years. Maybe you don't want the country to collapse at this point because it has nukes and is at the center of the most densely populated region in the world? Among all kinds of other complicated circumstances.
Most of this article is rubbish. There's very little news and nothing particularly significant. North Korea is important in case studies on fake news. Why? Because no one likes them, they're the villain and no one will go to bat for them. It's long been a testbed for fake news to see what they can get away with.
This article doesn't read like it was written by "Rick Moran". It's probably written by an oriental. Also North Korea has been on the brink of collapse forever. It's also BS. It's not pleasant for a lot of people in North Korea but believe it or not it's still better than for example some African nations and other undeveloped nations and there's never been any indications that it's that unstable. More stagnant at this point.
If you're problem is over population you're only thinking in proportions. Though it's odd as simply ignoring it does a lot of you're work for you.
Mass global rationing which is really one of the basic principles of communism.
However he's wrong about immune escape. That one is a mess. They say it doesn't exist when it suits them then say it exists when it suits them. This isn't a true false thing. It's complicated and depends. It's a risk factor. They like to say it has happened when it has not though.
What they want it to eliminate it and that goal is extreme, it is excessive for a harsh cold. The one thing that goal does offer however is unparalleled control.
They're just ignoring flu. Lockdown might abate it somewhat but it's a give away when you realise in many cases they've just stopped checking for it. I haven't been sick since lockdown though that's not unexpected going from being in close proximity to hundreds of people in a big orgy for several hours a day to not at all.
I can tell you what is easier. Using the uncommon common cold. That is what this is. A new version breaks each few years and does the rounds. Usually we don't detect them when they first emerge we just get hit with each wave of cold washing up on our locale shore without knowing where it came from.
We're reaching the point now where sensitivity is up that we can pick up a new cold potentially especially if new and a bit more severe than usual. Just that new ability alone can fool people. That's a sensitivity issue.
The evidence for a lab origin is really compelling and even if it was originally fake labs have been able to make the virus from the RNA alone, the full live functioning virus because they have that capability. Some Swiss labs did it for example because scientists lacked isolated live samples to examine and experiment with early on.
The death of. Not the killing of. At this point it will not break any ethical standards to say the fatal overdose of.