Preview:
████████████████████████████████████████████████
████████████████████████████████████████████████████
█████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████████
██████████
I'm not really sure feminism speaks for all women but its station allows it to broadcast to women enough to corrupt them enlarge.
Money and availability.
Does this guy have to shout all the time?
There's no conflict in their programming here it's just scene->objects->sortByHate()->first() so more of a limitation.
You'll find the only fraud they'll ever find will be Republican even though there's always going to be a very small amount of fraud either way.
I wouldn't want to impregnate a woman with a smug arrogant face like that. She wouldn't be fit for raising children. They'd be constantly berated for all manner of innocent behaviour growing up with devastating psychological damage.
The only time I want to see that face on a woman is when I charge her taking a mighty spinning leap then while at face height with my bum hurtling in the direction of her face having turned around on the upward climb ripping off a massive odorous fart before lacking with my back to her and walking off.
A firm hand is needed but also one that strikes with precision. You don't want one that spanks the kid that's behaving while giving praise to misbehaviour.
Working with BLM is like working with Al Qaeda or something potentially even worse. When it comes to groups like that the only reason we have a common enemy is because everyone is their enemy. It's inevitable that they will bite the hand that feeds.
This phenomena is well known. It's the modus operandi of the Democrats to support the enemy of my enemy is my friend when it comes to extremist groups like BLM. Usually it's islamic extremists they support like in Yugoslavia, Libya, Syria, etc but in this case pro-black extremists is the next best thing to exploit in the USA.
The fact that they're fighting a proxy war like this in your own country against the rest of the country to anyone else in the world tells us that civil war has already started in the USA.
The ones that would be compatible would peel off from BLM anyway realising they're in the wrong group.
That's a gargantuan liability. Right out of the door most of them are criminals. That has been the primary driving for for BLM. If you don't understand what BLM is then you've really no business of thinking of working with them.
When it comes to the ones that are not criminals they're retarded. BLM are their own worst enemy when it comes to fighting what they claim to be fighting. They're so stupid that they're fighting for the enemy they're supposed to be fighting against. This level of stupidity cannot be understated.
Between those two categories there's very little good. You tend to have genuinely corrupt people left over and real hardcore anti-white racists.
I've examined this prospect and it's not viable. They're by no means a natural ally and should be afforded zero legitimacy. At best they're useful idiots. It is feable that you can take advantage of them while exercising great care not to do stupid things like strengthening them too much to fight your enemy for you but working with them is out of the question.
The media isn't protected by the 1st amendment on this and I believe this presents a constitutional rights suit against them. This is a direct and explicit attack on the right to a defence and a fair trial.
The media owes Kyle Rittenhouse billions in punitive damages for this and massive defamation.
This is really gay.
Floyd has built up as tolerance he'll be fine.
The biggest problems are for me...
- Elections are supposed to have active integrity verification and preventative measures to minimise the scope for foul play and to make it easier to focus on the remaining blindspots in the first place.
- The system was ailing in the first place and the changes for lockdown have made far for scope for it to be possible to exploit the system and to not leave enough evidence to determine if it was or not.
- They have now had time to run their own audit including in secret that would be the same as this one but they fix anything their audit picks up then rinse and repeat until there is nothing so a subsequent opposition audit wouldn't find anything.
I don't believe at this point it is possible for them to do anything that could make me reasonably sure that foul play didn't switch the results.
A bit like Chauvin's trial the media bias alone is enough to invalidate the election result. On account of that the USA is a deeply flawed democracy.
On account of several other deficits increasingly more severe the USA is now a hybrid regime. It is officially no longer a democracy. It's a mongrel system. It also means you can now formally call it a regime.
At the current rate of progression it will be a dictatorship in a year or so.
In this case absolutely not. Women only care about not upsetting people and she explicitly states that.
I'm getting a bit tired of people saying because they didn't want to cause riots. That's the least of their concerns. People wont just be after a new pair of trainers. They'll be after them. They'll be angry and upset with them.
The jury doesn't care about riots very much at all.
I prefer Tim Pools open minded position on Chauvin's innocence which becomes a fact when examining all of the evidence, the actual evidence, nothing second hand.
He was a real idiot when he made argument toward criminal culpability for the officer that accidentally drew her gun instead of the taser (muscle memory sucks sometimes) simply on the principle that you should be responsible for what comes out of the barrel no matter what, over extending a principle that's meant to apply to the fame of mind before not after and that cannot apply in the case of an antonymous reflex in combination with situational factors that push humans to the limits of their capacity where they're likely to make a mistake.
If I were a judge and saw 70 lawyers all filling to stop this that alone would be very close to being enough to disqualify their case. That much effort to block a lawful examination of the election that they should have no reason to be concerned with tells you something is up.
Chauvin should have been given paid stress leave at minimum. He should also have been able to sue the media for defamation.
The cops who arrested Tony Timpa should at the very least be severely reprimanded if I remember the case right.
The prone position is 100% safe with one exception. The face can be pushed straight down into a surface especially a soft surface which can block the external airways essentially smothering the person.
When in the prone position officers need to routinely observe the suspect to make sure this doesn't happen. We see in the case of George Floyd that Derek Chauvin does look down to check the suspect is able to breath in accordance to proper training.
If someone checks the Tony Timpa video I believe the cops were preoccupied among themselves chatting and also with somewhat callous disregard for the detainee.
I wouldn't call for manslaughter in that case but the actions do closely approach that level of negligence and there would most certainly be a case to be made by his family against the department.
Demonstrate the critical thinking and research that leads to the conclusion that black people are superior to white people.
The coroner's report is fraudulent. As far as I can tell all of it looks in order except he put homicide. Nelson skirts over this. Adding that to the report makes it self contradictory. I think he really should have challenged that up front and openly. He lacks a long statement basically making the case for that particular part being fraudulent but shies away from saying it in as many words.
If I understood it correctly the coroner says he didn't watch the video he's a hair's whisker from being caught in a lie because homicide is almost certainly based on the video.
Nelson on many fronts didn't keep abreast of the prosecution. You know he allowed them to flip it from presumption of innocence to presumption of guilty with Nelson having to prove innocence beyond a reasonable doubt?
The defence made an invalid argument in many respects that Floyd did not overdose which I've been able to formally disprove. However the entire argument was moot because at best they could not show it was not possible or probably for him to have overdosed. At best all they could possibly do is raise the slim possibility that it didn't kill him.
Based on studies and ample scientific data the dose almost certainly would have killed Floyd. Based on other cases he had at least around a 10% chance of being dead on arrival.
There's also absolutely nothing Chauvin could have done to either kill Floyd or increase Floyd's chances of survival that he could have reasonably believed would have done so at the time.
He didn't even do anything sufficient to receive a reprimand.
She does the soy gawp.
I skimmed through it and am I going mad, in the wrong page or something? Big block of text about Paul Manafort and Roger Stone. How is that anything to do with Seth Rich and his murder?