I will make a pillow company for liberals anyone want to invest?
The pillows will be fairly standard with the exception of having a nipple.
If you run a search to say find me the polynomial that matches the difference between these two plots (the lines on the graph) the best well then that's what you're going to get, the polynomial with the highest correlation.
If you're doing this on a single graph you might just be fooling yourself. They do it on other graphs and that is more suspect because they should not match so well though in the video they don't show their working out clearly enough to fully verify it.
That said the same as in Lyndell's video, even for a single graph this is curious.
If you look at the key or the poly nominal it's sort of a wave. It goes up and down. If you look at the registrations it's like a wavy wave. You see the large wave with the big ups and downs then the higher frequency wave with small ups and downs.
The polynomial shown is just the difference. The delta series. For that to exhibit so little suboscillation compared to the parent is indeed very strange. There's a big drop in variance that seems a bit implausible to me.
I would expect the correlation to match a polynomial increasingly more as you add degrees and for it to be quite high but things like less than a thousandth when the parent graph oscillates a few percent is a bit too tight.
As far as death tolls go the USA really didn't lose a great deal of people proportionately in the world wars. As far as casualty rates go the USA has done fairly well.
Still proportionately if 200K to 400K is going to stand out that much with the current population I would expect 300K give or take with a much lower population to stand out strongly.
Maybe they don't include war deaths in the data or something?
All the journalists and other members of the elite that make our lives a misery being pilled into mass graves would make my day.
Some people are getting the maths wrong on this. I don't think they understood the Lyndell video properly but all they've done is choose the curve with the highest correlation. You'll get a high R by default so they're basically tricking themselves.
It only started to get interesting when exactly the same set of points works on multiple datasets. They're doing a more advanced version of the mathematical mistake that Shiva made as far as I can tell and it's a distraction away from the real evidence that they have.
They do eventually start to apply it to other countries which makes it more compelling.
No, the cube is a she.
It's not actually just a cube but a cube with a vagina. If you look up the Stone of Kaaba. People come from all over the world to stick their head in the vagina.
You know when you're walking down the beach and see a particularly odd stone that stands out? One of those.
If you think that's strange they have it mounted in the vulva of a giant metallic vagina.
I told people this would happen.
Strange you would have thought they might have then called it the nationalist socialist party. They didn't. The term they used alludes to something else. Essentially dictatorship. Though not many would have wanted to have admitted that. This means socialist dictatorship over the nation. When you have something like The National Party, that takes up the spot where they can be no other in the country, it means single party rule, by socialists.
We have this thing called English or language. If we're going to call national socialism nationalism you're not conforming to the language. The consensus is of people with an IQ of 100 or less who are incapable of understanding the most basic set theory. They're not relevant. It's like trying to establish trigonometry by asking worms for their opinion.
The major mistake people make is that don't look up what NSDAP means or Nazi is short for. Though the party was particularly nationalistic it's not in their name. It's national, not nationalist. That's a very different meaning. It's much as it doesn't say "Kill Ze Jews" in their name. To truly encapsulate the party's ideological, sociological and political theories takes volumes. It's not consistent either and like most left wing ideology it has a strong potential for being contradictory which can add to much of the confusion.
Generally speaking you need national socialism before moving on to global or international socialism socialism. When you stop at national socialism isn't inherent to national socialism itself.
What's crucial in this is that communism is an extension of socialism, global socialism and national socialism are all branches of socialism. They all have something in common.
They all have class theory in common and though it doesn't necessarily fit into its name national socialism is most famous for applying class theory to race. When you look at the national socialists in the USA they are the same in that respect except for an inversion to the extreme opposite in many cases.
They simply reversed the rankings so for example now disabled people are on the top of the social hierarchy but it's basically the same thing. When there's no more white people in the USA and the master races are dominant you'll start to see a very familiar picture.
Diagnosing all black people with paranoid delusion seems a little racist to me.
A lot of this is really trying to work out terminology. This can be difficult. You can look at what German National Socialists said to explain themselves, conventional meanings or what it was in practice. I tend to lean toward what things are and what they're supposed to be rather than interpretations.
For me national socialism is an abstract concept that's very broad. I could create my own variant of it which would still be national socialism but differ in all the conventional ways from other manifestations. You can only fit so much into a name. I know two people called Bob but they're very different people.
I know two people who are firefighters but they do not have identical philosophies of firefighting or on matters loosely related or unrelated. On things smoking should be banned, one thinks otherwise. It's a mistake to think when you see one that supports the extreme preventative measure is representative of all manifestations of firefighting.
National socialism in its most basic form simply means socialism on a national basis. It's like the National Health System. It means one socialist system for the nation, one society, run by people applying sociological speculation. It is monopolistic and holistic.
National socialism, whether it's on a national scale because that's the maximum extent of its ability to expend or because of some ideological notion is secondary to what really makes a national socialist, it's not truly at the core of the ideology though those with their own specific take would like to make arguments for why it is. They all like to say they're the one true national socialists but to really understand it you have to understand what they fundamentally have in common which can be hard without enough permutations to see what is variable and what isn't.
The Germans were a funny lot because ideologically they wanted it for their own country and wanted to run things their own way with lesser concern for other ideologies globally yet when it came down to it they still did not respect the independence and sovereignty of other nations. Though for different reasons they still converged on the same evil.
Most people today don't really understand what nations are or how they work and the notion that the Germans were bad simply because they were nationalist is nonsense. All nations were nationalist and if you're going to carry that argument then you would have to question whether the Germans were the wrong party in ignoring Poland, France and Russia's among others sense of entitlement to a national status as nations inherently nationalist.
Leaders of nations that lead socialist nations might also believe that model best for the world but they're not world leaders in a literal sense, they're not leaders of the world. There are however a branch of them working in that direction.
As we see modern national socialism it's not as strictly global as you think and it still follows the same underlying principle of the German version. It still picks favourite peoples, races, etc. It's really only different in that it's knocked Germans down in the rankings over other groups. It's very much otherwise the same thing.
One of the reasons that National Socialism was able to rise in Germany is because they at least hit one nail on the head. People in their own country take precedence. The elite at the time one way or another were complicit in effectively policies of German's last stemming from the great war.
Taking on a more global perspective has a lot more to do with simply that they can. If the world were as connected when national socialists were running Germany they then too probably would have further pushed for global reach.
I think the mistake many people make is that national socialism specifically refers to nationalism or is at the exclusion of international socialism.
Though difference branches will tie these together fundamentally they're inherently their own things.
National socialism is just one nation under socialism. The distinction is more one of practicality. For many actors they can only rule their nation so international socialism simply isn't an option. National socialism is the maximum socialism usually achievable. Given the opportunity however it doesn't mean they won't go further.
You can talk about taking over a nation as a fairly regular theme but in terms of objectives taking over the world wouldn't normally be viable.
National socialists can be international socialists as well. This might not be true of all branches but it is of the Democrats version of national socialism.
Funnily enough international is often the wrong word as well. That means between nations. Globalist is a better terms because they believe in elevating international organisations to become supernational powers such as the UN and the WHO. They believe in global authority over independence or sovereignty.
The Democrats are national socialists and they do work with globalist socialists.
All national socialism means is the same as federal socialism might mean.
A Democrat led congress would never do that.
The whole servers in Frankfurt, Italy, Satellites, etc thing stole way too much attention. It got in the way of pursuing common sense evaluation of the election where the election actually occurred. It becomes very obvious distraction when we're talking about a US election but somehow you're supposed to believe that the EU is where you need to be looking.
Pretty sure that's dick cheese.
He's foreign. EU or something with those spaces before exasperations.
All you have to do to bring them to their knees is get some HP brown sauce, rub it on your face and then they'll do anything you command. They'll even beg you to pee all over them. I'm not lying. Eurotrash is a real documentary.
I'm just a poor boy, I need no sympathy,
Because I'm easy come, easy go,
Little high, little low,
Any way the wind blows doesn't really matter to
Me, to me
The funny thing is that I've hired a lot of people in programming and anyone who puts spaces inside brackets doesn't get hired.
They're welcome to come to me if they like. I'm brewing up some alphabeti spagetti but I'm all out of letters.
To be fair I made a mess around DC so can't blame them for cleaning it up sorry my bad.
I'd bag AOC if she had a bag over her head don't tell anyone. Would only be recreational. Wouldn't want a kid with the head of a horse and a brain to match.
I forgot it's over a few years.