Because the city itself probably doesn't want the riots, but the elites and the Democrats in general? They fucking love that shit.
They're virtue signalling commies, their behaviour constantly contradicts itself.
Why did companies donate 100's of millions of dollars to BLM whilst BLM was burning their shit down?
Thank you for the recognition. Thought this joke was lost in the wind.
You said it better than I did.
It's sad how often these predictions come true too. Once you've seen how things really work, they're so predictable and obvious in their plans.
I have a few commie cucks that would like to speak to you about that.
It's possible he was so drugged off his face that he thought he was a tree.
Think Ukrainians that were previously occupied and now called illegal immigrants in their own homes.
If the country isn't destroyed by 2024, we need 2nd term Trump to be the madman that we all wanted him to be.
It's quite literally that. They'd lose control of their attack dogs and a large portion of their voters. Sure, they could stir up another fake racial incident closer to the elections but those in power don't want to give BLM the win here. It just doesn't benefit them in any way.
The media makes a fuck ton of money from ratings surrounding these kind of incidents, the Democrats capitalize on racial issues and act as their saviours, BLM leaders themselves don't even want the win in this case because it means they'll lose power too.
Don't you think those in power would prefer him to be innocent? Means more riots which means worse race relations which means the faster collapse of the country, which means more power for the Democrats. Why would BLM continue to vote for Democrats if Chauvin is found guilty? Systemic oppression is gone!
If they're being honest and not just trying to stir up the public to be mad when they get a not-guilty verdict, then it's typical lefty behaviour.
They don't listen to logic or reason or basic argument, they hear their own biases and feel good to hear the sound of their own farts and immediately smell them afterwards, and then they hear the opposing argument and get angry and label the other side into whatever relevant tribe they can, in this case, racist.
Why would they listen to the defence of a racist cop?
Honestly, saying "oh we held him down in front of the car exhaust and he might have died from that instead of the knee" doesn't seem to help their case.
If I held someone's head under water and they died I would think I would be responsible for their death. Holding someone in front of a non-breathable gas would be the same thing.
Obviously I don't think that's why poor Kirby died, but it doesn't seem like a good defence until the dumb fucks on the prosecution decided to respond with his oxygen levels.
Then you do it for the future of our country.
This isn't entirely true though. It is in their nature to be aggressive little shit stains. They were bred over many generations to have the highest pain endurance among dogs, be one of the most deadly dog breeds that never gives up killing whatever it has attached it's teeth to, and to enjoy doing so.
They wag their tails and look like they're smiling when they're mauling children and old people. It's in their genetics to enjoy killing. Sure, they can also be domesticated and maybe if you're lucky they won't maul your girlfriend or children in their sleep, like many of these "soft, caring, cuddly babies" have done to thousands of families. But I'd rather not take the risk.
Examples are good to help understand, but having someone else give you examples will never put you in a position where you can handle yourself in a real situation.
Nothing that the other person says or does should provoke a negative reaction from you.
He said "duh", as in "obviously!" right? That was barely even offensive or rude, he could have actually been acting playful with you. Regardless though, you should never have said anything that made you sound like you were crossing your arms and throwing a tantrum.
You could have told him he certainly acts like a Biden supporter, or mocked him for being confused about his hatred for Trump but how much he's clearly into you etc.
Make the whole thing playful. You're not chatting with this person because you want a political conversation, you want a romantic relationship with them so turn their bitchy comments into a joke and laugh at them or make them feel like they should be seeking your approval.
I share that opinion. I was trying to play devil's advocate and make my best argument for pro-vaccine.
If it was a functional vaccine, then I would understand why the elderly would benefit from it.
Trump trusts his advisors and loves to parade his accomplishments.
The vaccine was rushed because Trump cut the red tape and told them to get it done.
The vaccine makes sense for the elderly. It doesn't make sense for young, healthy people to take.
Trump is proud of his achievement, realistically, if you were to believe that the vaccine is effective at stopping the spread of Covid and is saving lives, then you could make the argument that stopping the vaccines because a tiny percentage of people are having bad reactions is wrong.
Yeah he actually was, OP was definitely the bigger faggot in this case.
Don't be so sensitive and offended by such petty things. If OP had just given his response and held his frame and acted unbothered by the "rude" - "duh" then he might have found the guy to not have been a typical radical lefty.
They literally looked like wild animals.
Were they on drugs?
I have to write it on my hand so that I don't forget when I'm out and about.
With no signs to tell the sheep how to act, everyone started exchanging bodily fluids within 2 meters of each other and killed each others grandparents.
That's easily a manslaughter charge.
I'm really close to believing that a large portion of the population really aren't sentient. This past year has proven that beyond a doubt.
Pretty accurate comment.
On a side note, is there anywhere in the country that doesn't have online delivery now? I try not to consoom much and I'm trying to be as off the grid as possible, so I rarely actually have to leave my property to come in contact with other people, especially in the past year.
Which makes me think that this creature could absolutely do the same and apparently she has a much better reason than I do. So why doesn't she? The answer is likely obvious.
What's really interesting is that the left genuinely believes that the opposite is true.
Through some weird combination of their frustration at school shooters not being labelled "terrorists" and their inability to recognise why Islamic terrorist attacks are labelled as terrorism, they short circuit and conclude that "the media" never holds white violence accountable and always points out when the attacker was brown or black.
It's like they live in an alternate universe, because we see multiple posts on here daily of how the media, almost universally ignores the race of the attacker when it's a non-white person, but always blames white people as a whole when an attacker isn't even white (see: attacks on Asians).
Hopefully he taught at least 7 people a valuable lesson.
Don't even know what a MIC-fag is.
I made a jokey prediction. Turns out I was at least 15% correct with my prediction.
The American people do not support a war with Russia? What? What does that have to do with my comment you strange creature.