11
muy_libre 11 points ago +11 / -0

Unrelated, but you snagged the Pepe username, you sly dog!

5
muy_libre 5 points ago +5 / -0

I mean I don't disagree, but Democrats a retarded species...

4
muy_libre 4 points ago +4 / -0

I think it's a fair point, but I think Democrats view Hillary a bit different than Republicans view John McCain or Mitt Romney... a lot of that has to do with the fact that she's a woman or "fierce" or whatever the fuck. Also the fact that she was a first lady, a senator, first ever female candidate of a major party, etc. Much different figure than the two you mentioned. I get what you're saying, but you don't think people would be more enthusiastic about Hillary than Joe Biden? Idk, maybe you're right, but I think they would.

3
muy_libre 3 points ago +3 / -0

Yikes... that makes TOO much sense... just got a chill down my spine

4
muy_libre 4 points ago +4 / -0

I've thought that as well, but I could also see them billing her as the messiah that saved the Democrat party and the country... It'll be billed like Conor McGregor vs. Nate Diaz 2. They'll try to close that enthusiasm gap.

14
muy_libre 14 points ago +14 / -0

Until recently, I would've said it was a silly bet.

35
muy_libre 35 points ago +35 / -0

Definitely not Bernie because the DNC despises its voters. They'll plunge the shaft into Bernie even further if it gets them closer to power.

12
muy_libre 12 points ago +12 / -0

Many people forget about scandals years after the fact. Keeps the focus off her and onto the dementia patient. She'll be like a messiah from the ashes after the debates expose Joe even further. Idk, just spitballing

7
muy_libre 7 points ago +7 / -0

Hillary no longer has party support, only some people who still fear her. She has more scandal liability than even the Bidens. Nevertheless she has good reason to attack Trump. A Biden win is her best bet to remain free and keep her money, and simple hatred is reason enough.

I've been saying this as well. Only recently have I become more suspicious of what's going on. It's something fucky, I know that..

I've long thought the VP pick would be Poca, since Biden strongly hinted at a debate that he would appoint a black woman to SCOTUS. To me, that said 'no VP Kamala'. But now, I suppose that was just one of many bullshit trial balloons. The DNC race riots make me think the VP pick will be a black woman.

I also initially thought Fauxcahontas, but black lady seems more plausible than that currently. Heels Up Harris or Susan Rice, with Stacey Abrams being the dark horse. Definitely Obongo running the show.

4
muy_libre 4 points ago +4 / -0

I'm gonna be honest, I scoffed at people who thought she'd be the VP pick... My own grandfather has been saying it for months... I'm beginning to agree that it might happen as a bait and switch scheme. Who knows, either way it's gonna be some insanely corrupt person with a vagina.

107
muy_libre 107 points ago +107 / -0

Let me clarify:

I've been laughing off people saying Hillary is going to replace Joe Biden and join the race last minute. I'm still not completely convinced. However, as we get closer to November, she's becoming more and more visible as Biden largely stays locked in the basement...

I think there's a good chance that Biden picks her as VP and then he either A) drops out of the race and she replaces him or B) He resigns if elected (fat chance after the debates) or C) some other undetermined and corrupt method of getting her in the race

This way, supposedly "harmless" Joe Biden stays the focus of the race, Hillary gets zero scrutiny for 90% of the race, the Fake News Industrial Complex throttles the fake polls and fake news to demoralize conservatives and make moderates/undecided/independents look elsewhere, and then ... BOOM swap Hillary Clinton in before anyone has the chance to really evaluate what just happened.

Seems plausible to me. Thoughts?? Criticize my theory all you want! I wanna hear everyone's opinions.

12
muy_libre 12 points ago +12 / -0

Seems like this could be some sort of elaborate bait and switch.

2
muy_libre 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well, you did kind of say the "horseshit stock prices" wasn't winning...

3
muy_libre 3 points ago +3 / -0

I'm against pretty much any government involvement in the markets, so I'm with you there. However, to say a rising stock market in general isn't a win is pretty foolish. The entire future of the country rests on the stock market. My future rests on the stock market because my entire retirement savings is in the stock market.

What do you think would happen if the stock market dropped? You think these jobs gains would still continue? I think that's foolish.

202
muy_libre 202 points ago +202 / -0

BILL CLINTON IS A CHILD RAPIST

6
muy_libre 6 points ago +9 / -3

Why is this shit even upvoted? Of course a rising stock market is a win... Jesus

7
muy_libre 7 points ago +8 / -1

Mine ain't even down because of all the shares I bought when the market was down! I've MADE money from my investments during this hoax! WINNING!

20
muy_libre 20 points ago +20 / -0

What's with the people in this thread saying a rising stock market isn't a win? Sounding like a bunch of damn lefties...

24
muy_libre 24 points ago +27 / -3

I mean when he still associated with Epstein. When was he barred from Mar-A-Lago?

[edit] Nvm, it's in the same clip I shared earlier: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Yqb59n69Z80&t=5m30s

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›