Weak illegitimate regimes always use boogeymen as an excuse to artificially boost the public's perception of their claim to power:

1. To falsely create the sense of an emergency that the regime must be entrusted to deal with (also granting them more and more "emergency" powers).

2. To deflect from their own failings and unpopularity by keeping the focus on the boogeymen, "whataboutism" at its worst.

This is why Trump will never lose relevance even long after he passes away; the threat of his "dangerous cult army of followers" will always be drummed up by the establishment to sell clickbait and outrage, trick the lemmings into donating to the ADL and similar organizations and keep a loyal army of unpaid government snitches sniffing out dissidents. The establishment is still using Hitler as this kind of phantom boogeyman too, 76 years later.

They're also using the excuse of the virus threat to limit how many public appearances Biden is expected to make, because they know each one is received very poorly and gives another opportunity to expose how deeply unpopular the regime is (thereby casting doubt on how they could possibly have received enough votes to win legitimately). This is also why the comments section is always removed from White House official videos on YouTube within an hour. If they could hide the dislike ratio they would (probably a new incoming YouTube feature). These are the two biggest boogeyman excuses the regime is currently using:

1. The Chinese virus (despite the fact that it's no more dangerous than the flu)

2. "White supremacist terrorism"

One of the most important things you can do is to never lend any credence to these lies and excuses. The feds constantly try to incite violence because they need it to justify the 2nd excuse. When there is no justification they fabricate it - but these fabrications can be exposed and often are (which is why the establishment craves real attacks as sick as that sounds). Let the Jussie Smolletts and AOCs of the world make fools of themselves delusionally ranting about so-called threats to their safety; this will only erode the regime's perceived legitimacy faster. Actual violence will reinforce their perceived legitimacy so don't do it.

Edit: I forgot to add, the militarization of the perimeter of the White House is another painfully obvious indicator of how weak this regime's perceived legitimacy really is.

TLDR: Culture + humor > violence. Learn to code / draw, make fun anti-establishment culture (games, cartoons, etc) and spread it.

The enemy (leftists, marxists, globalists, communists, deep state, establishment, etc just wanted to clarify) fears cultural and ideological opposition far more than violence. Cultural and ideological opposition target the enemy at their weakest point: the truth. They have no truth. Their whole worldview is based on lies (about human nature, profit incentives, biology and gender, etc). Since we have the truth on our side we also have humor on our side because jokes without any grain of truth in them aren't funny.

The enemy doesn't fear physical violence, in fact they welcome it because they can use it as propaganda to demonize us. They would gladly sacrifice some low level grunts and antifa losers to serve as martyrs and propaganda ammo to turn people away from us (they don't give a shit about them). What they do fear is truthful, funny and effective culture (games and otherwise) that undermine their ideology and the corrupt system built upon it. That's why Angela Merkel used legal pressure on Steam to ban Heimat Defender (a game which mocked her) despite the fact that it contains no violence or hate of any kind. The fact that it satirizes and mocks globalism without using hate or violence makes it extremely effective and therefore terrifying to globalists. Funnily enough the devs released the game for free after Steam banned it and the Streisand effect caused tens of thousands of downloads.

The same will be true of any game (or other cultural work) that effectively satirizes and undermines Biden or any other left wing globalist leader. That's why they're clamping down so hard on the spread of information and culture but why glowing federal agents continue to incite violence. They want violence to demonize us, they don't want funny and popular criticism of their corrupt system.

1. Do they live up to the values they preach? Ex. do they go on and on about the importance of traditionalism but then live a very non-traditional, modern, urban, hedonistic and degenerate lifestyle? Do they talk vaguely about lowering immigration and the importance of borders but also own lots of stock in companies that use cheap imported labor (ex. Koch brothers)?

2. Does MSM invite them for interviews, and do they accept these invitations? (generally people who are a real threat to the establishment are simply ignored and memory holed by MSM or demonized without any interview offer or chance for a rebuttal)

3. Do they complain about censorship of conservatives but refuse to join alt tech platforms? Or worse, do they gatekeep against alternative platforms and accuse Gab, Telegram, etc of being "too far" or "racist / extremist"?

4. Do they talk about the right to self defense frequently, but then "disavow" or refuse to support people who actually use force to defend themselves against left wing political violence and terrorism (ex. Kyle Rittenhouse)?

5. Do they make a lot of money with their audience - ad revenues, site membership fees, merch etc - but then it's unclear how they're using the money to further nationalism? Are they sitting on a big pile of money but not using it to for example invest in more servers or coders for Gab or other alt tech, invest in legal defense funds for conservatives who are unfairly treated by the courts for defending themselves, invest in the creation of anti-communist games, books, cartoons and culture, etc? Is it obvious that they're using their money to further their stated purpose as a nationalist or are their finances and activities behind the scenes murky or frustratingly (and suspiciously) idle?

6. Do their stated goals and vision for society line up consistently with the policies they support i.e. are they simply paying lip service to nationalism for popularity but then disavow the required policies to achieve their stated goals? For example, do they say they want border security and lower immigration but then disavow mass deportation of illegal immigrants as "wrong" or "racist"?

7. (Super clear indicator) do they magically transform into leftists when confronted with anyone further right than them, for example do they begin using leftist language and smears and typical left wing underhanded tactics against people who hold a further right position than them on anything? Do the words "racist" or xenophobe, bigot, homophobe, hate speech, etc ever accidentally slip out of their supposedly nationalist mouths when confronted with an idea that is "too far right" for them?

8. Are they emotionally mature, calm and level-headed adults who want to present a confidence-inspiring and serious face to the public, which includes resolving disagreements with other nationalist leaders in a mature and tactically intelligent way - or are they silly drama queens who thrive on the attention (and increased ad revenues) that petty infighting provides in the short term and indulge in this drama frequently?

Just some thoughts, there are probably more indicators or better ways to word the ones above. Feedback appreciated.

Your continued breathing is essentially "potential ban evasion" to them and a constant threat that you might find some other way to express yourself that they haven't banned yet. Just a random thought for the day.

And it's far from over. This is a marathon not a sprint. Removing the poison of marxist lies from every square inch of the West was always going to take much longer than Trump's presidency and natural lifespan, and the primary tool used to remove it isn't even politics; it's culture. Politics is downstream from culture.

Besides preparing for the worst (guns, food, etc) and hoping for the best, and continuing to live your life as well as you can, the most important thing you can do is to create culture that can spread among the masses and oppose the enemy's false narrative. We need it to win hearts and minds to our side.

Don't let the only games that kids have access to be made by stalin-worshipping blue haired freaks.

Don't let the only novels that kids can read be written by pedophiles with hammer and sickle tattoos.

Don't let the only music kids can listen to be made by gender confused psychopaths who encourage fans to snitch on their parents to a communist police state.

If you don't have the skills or desire to create counter culture, I strongly suggest financially supporting those who do - after carefully and skeptically analyzing how they will use funds for their work.

If you find counter culture that you enjoy, please spread it around as much as possible, taking into account the fact that it will be somewhat of an uphill battle to distribute anything that isn't marxist-approved when mainstream platforms will be trying to ban it.

The enemy will continue to blast their message as loud as possible and attempt to silence our message. It's up to us to undermine their propaganda efforts by spreading our message in every medium imaginable, using every clever, dirty and underhanded trick possible to evade bans and deplatforming.

Memes are good but not enough, we need to do more to expand into cultural media that occupy the consumer's attention for much longer than a couple seconds (games, books, etc). These have deeper potential to transmit information and ideas.

This is a culture war on all fronts; nothing is sacred. If that means "ruining" something by injecting politics into it, so be it. The left will ruin it with their propaganda anyway so you might as well inject your counter message there as well. Failing to do so is simply giving up and letting them win by default; it's a loser's attitude.

This is an asymmetric culture war and we're on the lower resource lower organization side. We need to adapt and fight accordingly.

In order for talented individuals to devote the time necessary to make significant works of viral anti - left wing culture, they will need funding. Be skeptical of people who seek funding for such projects and critically analyze whether they are sincere and where the money will go, but if you do determine that they're worthwhile, consider funding them. Our enemy has billions of dollars to subvert entire franchises like Star Wars, but with only a fraction of that funding we can produce something entertaining that contains the truth, which is powerful enough to undermine lies with far more money behind them.

TLDR: Start making anti-communist books for children with pretty pictures.