1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

I don’t think you are ready for all of this. I think Reddit may be your speed. I will help you but just this once. If you can’t handle it off to reddit you go!

Reeee ad what I said. It was a sarcasm to draw attention to the fact that by the word he was telling the truth. He used his wife to shield himself. She can’t be made to testify against him he was able to say UNDER OATH ‘he did not make the decisions for the gain of function research. The NIH board of directors made the decisions.

Not only is he shielded with spousal privilege the leftist media has a 30 second clip of him under oath testifying he didn’t do it.

/sarcasm is part of meme warfare. If you don’t know who the enemy is, you end up saying stupid shstuff like you just did. Let me know how this works out for you.

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

dont you CuLtIsTs deal in facts? Fauci testified under oath that board of directors for the NIH approved the gain of function research! FAUCI has nothing to do with that he is not on the board!! FAUCI's WIFE is on the board!!! /s

0
n0w0y 0 points ago +1 / -1

2 more banks you never heard of are cash strapped all of a sudden.

You are right dumb to think an EO declaring a national emergency means nothing. SVB wasn’t a pedestrian bank that just so happens to all of a sudden be out of cash. Records were subpoenaed wrt Epstein. Read the order they don’t have to tell them before they take their money. Human rights abuses include the vaccines and Covid measures.

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +2 / -1

Executive Order 13818 of December 20, 2017

Blocking the Property of Persons Involved in Serious Human Rights Abuse or Corruption

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.) (NEA), the Global Magnitsky Human Rights Accountability Act (Public Law 114-328) (the “Act”), section 212(f) of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (8 U.S.C. 1182(f)) (INA), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,

I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that the prevalence and severity of human rights abuse and corruption that have their source, in whole or in substantial part, outside the United States, such as those committed or directed by persons listed in the Annex to this order, have reached such scope and gravity that they threaten the stability of international political and economic systems. Human rights abuse and corruption undermine the values that form an essential foundation of stable, secure, and functioning societies; have devastating impacts on individuals; weaken democratic institutions; degrade the rule of law; perpetuate violent conflicts; facilitate the activities of dangerous persons; and undermine economic markets. The United States seeks to impose tangible and significant consequences on those who commit serious human rights abuse or engage in corruption, as well as to protect the financial system of the United States from abuse by these same persons.

I therefore determine that serious human rights abuse and corruption around the world constitute an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States, and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal with that threat.

I hereby determine and order:

Section 1. (a) All property and interests in property that are in the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or hereafter come within the possession or control of any United States person of the following persons are blocked and may not be transferred, paid, exported, withdrawn, or otherwise dealt in:

(i) the persons listed in the Annex to this order;

(ii) any foreign person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to be responsible for or complicit in, or to have directly or indirectly engaged in, serious human rights abuse;

(B) to be a current or former government official, or a person acting for or on behalf of such an official, who is responsible for or complicit in, or has directly or indirectly engaged in:

(1) corruption, including the misappropriation of state assets, the expropriation of private assets for personal gain, corruption related to government contracts or the extraction of natural resources, or bribery; or

(2) the transfer or the facilitation of the transfer of the proceeds of corruption;

(C) to be or have been a leader or official of:

(1) an entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section relating to the leader's or official's tenure; or

(2) an entity whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order as a result of activities related to the leader's or official's tenure; or

(D) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section; and

(iii) any person determined by the Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General:

(A) to have materially assisted, sponsored, or provided financial, material, or technological support for, or goods or services to or in support of:

(1) any activity described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section that is conducted by a foreign person;

(2) any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(3) any entity, including any government entity, that has engaged in, or whose members have engaged in, any of the activities described in subsections (ii)(A), (ii)(B)(1), or (ii)(B)(2) of this section, where the activity is conducted by a foreign person;

(B) to be owned or controlled by, or to have acted or purported to act for or on behalf of, directly or indirectly, any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; or

(C) to have attempted to engage in any of the activities described in subsections (iii)(A) or (B) of this section.

(b) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the effective date of this order.

Sec. 2. The unrestricted immigrant and nonimmigrant entry into the United States of aliens determined to meet one or more of the criteria in section 1 of this order would be detrimental to the interests of the United States, and the entry of such persons into the United States, as immigrants or nonimmigrants, is hereby suspended. Such persons shall be treated as persons covered by section 1 of Proclamation 8693 of July 24, 2011 (Suspension of Entry of Aliens Subject to United Nations Security Council Travel Bans and International Emergency Economic Powers Act Sanctions).

Sec. 3. I hereby determine that the making of donations of the types of articles specified in section 203(b)(2) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1702(b)(2)) by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order would seriously impair my ability to deal with the national emergency declared in this order, and I hereby prohibit such donations as provided by section 1 of this order.

Sec. 4. The prohibitions in section 1 include:

(a) the making of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services by, to, or for the benefit of any person whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order; and

(b) the receipt of any contribution or provision of funds, goods, or services from any such person.

Sec. 5. (a) Any transaction that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.

Sec. 6. For the purposes of this order:

(a) the term “person” means an individual or entity;

(b) the term “entity” means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization; and

(c) the term “United States person” means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.

Sec. 7. For those persons whose property and interests in property are blocked pursuant to this order who might have a constitutional presence in the United States, I find that because of the ability to transfer funds or other assets instantaneously, prior notice to such persons of measures to be taken pursuant to this order would render those measures ineffectual. I therefore determine that for these measures to be effective in addressing the national emergency declared in this order, there need be no prior notice of a listing or determination made pursuant to this order.

Sec. 8. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA and the Act as may be necessary to implement this order and section 1263(a) of the Act with respect to the determinations provided for therein. The Secretary of the Treasury may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.

Sec. 9. The Secretary of State is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, the INA, and the Act as may be necessary to carry out section 2 of this order and, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury, the reporting requirement in section 1264(a) of the Act with respect to the reports provided for in section 1264(b)(2) of that Act. The Secretary of State may, consistent with applicable law, redelegate any of these functions to other officers and agencies of the United States consistent with applicable law.

Sec. 10. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to determine that circumstances no longer warrant the blocking of the property and interests in property of a person listed in the Annex to this order, and to take necessary action to give effect to that determination.

Sec. 11. The Secretary of the Treasury, in consultation with the Secretary of State, is hereby authorized to submit recurring and final reports to the Congress on the national emergency declared in this order, consistent with section 401(c) of the NEA (50 U.S.C. 1641(c)) and section 204(c) of IEEPA (50 U.S.C. 1703(c)).

Sec. 12. This order is effective at 12:01 a.m., Eastern Standard Time, December 21, 2017.

Sec. 13. This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

Spot On!

We all know Hollywood is the devils playground but it makes me wonder about the timelines. We now are seeing daily the movie plots from the past 30 years playing in real time. It makes me wonder if hollywood made the movies to support an agenda 30 years later. Like desensitizing the public to reduce the backlash that would come as they create hell on earth.

So the question is did the 30 years of Hollywood create our current reality or is our current reality using the past to distract us?

5
n0w0y 5 points ago +5 / -0

I agree. Putin will not lose this. He will not accept a NATO expansion.

3
n0w0y 3 points ago +3 / -0

Keep it together. I would like to share one of the greatest moments in my life. My daughter was accepted with a full ride scholarship to medical school. I cried like a baby not just because I was happy it was the uncontrollable wave of emotion that hit me. All of the pain loss anger sadness for that moment on was worth every bit of that suffering.

You have are and will be suffering. When you get to the end it will have been worth it all. I promise.

Keep it together. You have a new battle. Raising a lady is hard. But you have shown her what a real man is. You have showed her selflessness. If the description of your x is accurate you daughter is already in the middle. Stay strong never a word about her mother in front of her. That is most important. Doesn’t matter what she does or has done. Kids in the middle will defend the other parent. Even if they don’t say it. If your ex talks bad about you to her I would bet my life your daughter defends you in her head and in her heart even if she is quiet. Any negative words or emotions from you only hurts the child in the middle. I am proud of you for doing what needs to be done. You are a veteran. You have family. We back you when we can and will be here to listen if nothing else.

Stay focused. Keep your head about you. Document everything. Fathers rights websites are the best forums. They recommend keeping journals. Store your proof offsite not in the house and not at work.

Nothing in front of you now but fear and air. Make it happen.

5
n0w0y 5 points ago +5 / -0

Take a look at the Twitter responses. I have never seen so many people on Twitter agreeing with each other ever. Normies are on the cusp.

No money should ever be allowed to go to another country without a vote from the people.

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

The sad part is our governments state and federal is that they can’t create a program that a 7 year old could do on a Commodore 64 basic after mastering his goto 10 statement

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

So she stole 100 peoples work out it together put her name on it then turned it in to the publishing company

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

It’s part of the game. I way the house will pass it. He trying to hide his douchebaggery while getting that dog in to the little people to remember our place.

2
n0w0y 2 points ago +2 / -0

Everyone feels that way. James is a smart man. He has been through the trenches. This board made a huge mistake.

2
n0w0y 2 points ago +2 / -0

China called opium the 3rd scourge. Opiium dens we’re outlawed and if you were caught they pull you out and shoot you in the head right in the street

1
n0w0y 1 point ago +1 / -0

you need to go back and read what i said again. in there you will clearly see i did not tell you to put on your shoes when going outside.

some things don't have to be said.

2
n0w0y 2 points ago +2 / -0

Fucking crazy but reporters nowadays are diversity hires. The proper question is did your wife have problems with you fucking the Chinese spy.

2
n0w0y 2 points ago +2 / -0

exactly!! said this the other day

view more: Next ›