I am simply asking for representation on this site.
You have representation, exactly the same as everyone else. Why do you feel you need special representation?
As I said, I have no problems with Christians in general. I'm culturally Christian and think many philosophical aspects of it are fine. It's when Christians want special rights that we start having a problem. A lot of people are "never Republicans" /solely/ because too many Christians want their moral principles codified into law, instead of just minding their own business and living their own lives.
Why do you need a special tag? It doesn't affect the Trump movement at all. It doesn't help anything. It only divides people into groups, and what we need now is unity, not more divisions.
I welcome everyone here who loves Liberty and Freedom, no matter what religion or background. We need less dividing of people into groups, not more. It's Communists, Fascists and Authoritarians who divide people into groups.
John Adams is welcome to his opinion, but the fact remains that neither God nor Christianity is mentioned in the U.S. Constitution in any way, and the only mention of religion is to limit the government's involvement in it. The point of the quote from the Treaty of Tripoli was to underscore that this country is not and was never intended to be a Christian theocracy. Undoubtedly we drew inspiration from Christianity -- so what? We also drew inspiration from Greek writings and numerous other sources.
Suppose a nation in some distant region should take the Bible for their only law book and every member should regulate his conduct by the precepts there exhibited. . . . What a Eutopia – what a Paradise would this region be!
I would assume you're just talking about the New Testament. If you're talking about the entire bible, I would question whether you've really read it.
But regardless, if you want to live in a theocracy, that's fine as long as you keep it confined within your own house, and keep it all away from me and my family.
Liberty and Freedom are what's important.
It's going to depend on the person. People vastly underestimate how much blackmail the CIA has on people to get them to comply. Some are surely just hungry for power (definitely Christie, who was an ass before Trump), but a lot of them are just compromised.
Invite a congressman to a party, have them sleep over, and they wake up with a 13 year old in their bed and someone taking pictures. Boom! They're controlled for life.
My controversial choice for "compromised" is Bill Gates. He was aggressive in business, but he was always a relatively normal dude until about five years ago, when he went full fascism. Dude smells compromised to me.
I thought that too, but 1) I don't think judges need reminding that it needs to be done fast, and 2) maybe they're trying to telegraph to future judges that they'll be well aware of what they're doing and they'll fight it.
Honestly I'd rather him stay in the Democratic party to be one of the reformers and make two pro-America parties, just with honest disagreements. No matter what we're going to have two parties, and I for one would love to have two actual, viable MAGA choices.
There are aspects of the Republicans that I don't like, but Democrat corruption and radicalism means there's no other choice. A lot of people are "never Republicans" and we need to give those people a place to go that isn't Fascist/Marxist bullshit.
I like Scott, but he does have an issue with pushing "I'M A FUCKING GENIUS" in your face. If you're really a genius, you don't have to tell everyone. Genius is as genius does.
Once in a while smug and arrogant people live up to their own billing. I would say Scott is about 70% as smart as he thinks he is. Still smarter than most and worth listening to, but to my eye it looks more insecure than self-confident.
I think they did. They just don't think it will matter. They're hoping all this will get suppressed, but the end game is a military coup. That's why Trump made the moves that he did at the DOD that will (hopefully) take away that option.
I still expect some kind of military move, though. I actually think Trump will use that as the justification for military tribunals for insurrection. It will be all-or-nothing for the Democrats.
It's about not abandoning a battlefield. A lot of people still get their news from Fox. It's not going to happen that suddenly everybody moves to B-level networks.
Fox may be controlled opposition, but we can use that to get our message out. It may be a diluted message, but it's still better than the DNC mass propaganda.
They want us to keep abandoning everything until we're pushed into a small, controllable little hole. Don't fall for the Doomer strategy of retreating everywhere they say mean things.
I'll just point out that he was invited to the White House to meet Trump. Here is the photo they took.
So he's not just a schlub cartoonist. He's obviously not talking to Trump directly, but he probably has connected friends. Who knows if he really knows something we here on td.win don't, though.
No, make no mistake: Trump is moving pieces on the chessboard right now to prevent a military coup.
These people absolutely wanted to stay, in order to manage the coup. Trump is way ahead of them all. These people were fired by "asking for their resignation."
It's a trick question designed for TRUMP SUPPORTERS. When Wallace says "independently certified", note that he did NOT say "legally certified". This was a set-up question to make Trump supporters accept the fraud that Wallace knew was coming.
"Hey, if Biden commits to 'independent' people calling the election, you guys should, too. Right? Right!!!? NOOOO we didn't mean LEGALLY certified!! Not that kind of independence! We meant US YOU LYING BIGOT TRAITORS"
"Hey Charlie Chaplin, maybe you shouldn't do a movie mocking Hitler during this time. This is a serious war! Same with you wartime cartoons! Bugs Bunny shouldn't be mocking the Third Reich!"
The greatest weapon against Totalitarians is mocking humor. They can't take it, and reveal themselves as the tyrants they are.
Because people are lazy and incompetent. If you always use doubles, you don't need to think about datatypes. And it doesn't matter that much. Doubles are fine for storing integers. You won't lose precision.
This is assuming you're using a language that allows specifying datatypes. If you're using a language with soft data types, you don't specify a type at all, such as Python, Javascript, PHP, Perl, etc. It wouldn't surprise me at all if these voting machines were written with a scripting language.
Yes, there is. The reason votes are anonymous is to 1) prevent vote purchasing, and 2) prevent vote intimidation. If you could check who you voted for, you could receive a payment after voting. Or imagine a boss that tells you that if you didn't vote the way he says, you'll be fired. Secret balloting is crucial to fair elections.