6
namenottaken 6 points ago +6 / -0

We have to stop using Streamable. Every time a video from there gets posted on this site, they take it down.

25
namenottaken 25 points ago +25 / -0

Combat-ready woman is an oxymoron. They should never have been let into combat roles, and our military is going to pay dearly for doing so when we get into another major conflict.

Then again, if the military is mobilized against us patriots, then their woke BS may play to our advantage.

8
namenottaken 8 points ago +8 / -0

I think that hyperinflation would cause the stock market to skyrocket. As the value of each dollar declines, the price of a stock relative to a dollar increases. I think that stocks, crypto, gold/silver, etc. are the best place to have your money right now, but I could be wrong.

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I need to figure out how to buy bitcoin. I've been interested in buying crypto for a while, but I don't know how to do so without signing up for one of those investment accounts, and I don't want to do that.

6
namenottaken 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, this is normal. Most stocks won't let you buy a part of a share. It's just telling you that it will buy as many shares as it can without going over $1000.

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +2 / -1

It will end our dominance on the world stage, yes. That doesn't make us any less capable of driving out Chinese influence on the home front. China is subverting us by infiltrating our institutions (like the media, military, universities) and bribing our political officials. The military and economic strength of the blue states will not help us stop that subversion. Cutting ties with them, and the D.C. hellscape that they control, will.

5
namenottaken 5 points ago +6 / -1

Who cares? We should worry about having a just, safe society here before we worry about the rest of the world. If they can't take care of themselves, then that's their own problem.

35
namenottaken 35 points ago +36 / -1

You're saying that as if he hadn't been giving lectures and speeches for at least a decade before that happened. Also, his "drug addiction" was an addiction to anxiety medication that was prescribed for him.

Imagine watching someone having withdrawal so bad that they're on the verge of death for 2 years and all you can muster about them is "he couldn't deal with his addictions."

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

Well, the good news is that the state won't demand us to believe the lies, we will just have to agree with them.

6
namenottaken 6 points ago +6 / -0

The bulk of the fraud happened in four cities, enough to just flip GA, WI, PA, and MI. If we refuse to vote, all of the rest of the country will go blue, and with it any chance of state/local resistance or secession. Even if there is fraud in every big city, we need to keep the counties and local governments on our side.

If you don't want to vote in federal elections anymore, I don't blame you there. I don't know if I will either.

17
namenottaken 17 points ago +20 / -3

The goal is for us to be counting the votes, not watching the count, so we can stop the cheating that way. It's not to detect the crime, it's to prevent it from being committed.

2
namenottaken 2 points ago +2 / -0

It looks like Twitter already deleted the tweet. What did it say?

9
namenottaken 9 points ago +9 / -0

Overvotes are where you vote for more options than allowed, like voting for more than one candidate in a race, while undervotes are when you leave the ballot blank for a certain race.

10
namenottaken 10 points ago +10 / -0

It's 9 AM, not PM. I'm just clarifying for anyone confused.

15
namenottaken 15 points ago +17 / -2

That and all of the fake ballots that are now mixed in with the real, with no way to tell which is which

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

While on the topic of voting restrictions, I think we ought to bar all welfare dependents from voting. They should get the ability back as soon as they're off of it, but there is a huge conflict of interest of people getting free money from the government voting for more free money. Back in the founding days, you were required to own land to vote for similar reasons.

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

I'm not sure what you mean. Wouldn't "in-play" and "at risk" mean the same thing? These are states that Trump needs to win that could go either way, so it makes sense to have rallies there.

2
namenottaken 2 points ago +2 / -0

Also, I wonder if Republicans voting early is hurting their plans. In previous elections, they could "find" more votes while counting to swing a close election, based off the premise that most early/absentee/etc. votes are democratic. Now, in many states, Republicans are matching or beating Democrats' numbers in early voting, so swinging the election blue using those votes won't work.

1
namenottaken 1 point ago +1 / -0

The 19th Amendment was a huge mistake.

33
namenottaken 33 points ago +33 / -0

Heck yeah! And I can say that the notarization process is legit. In Missouri, when you vote in-person, you have to show a photo ID and sign a sort of log book before you get your ballot. When you vote absentee (and by mail now, with this ruling), you get your ballot and fill it out, but it won't be counted unless it's notarized. You notarize it by going to the courthouse and showing an official your photo ID and signing the same kind of log book. The voter certification is just as secure. However, ballots could still be "lost" in the mail, so I would still recommend turning in your absentee ballot in person if you are voting absentee.

2
namenottaken 2 points ago +3 / -1

No God means no right and wrong in any form. If there is no higher authority that established our moral laws, then that would mean that they are all man-made. All our moral norms, then, would be arbitrary. Even good moral codes would have no true authority backing them, because there is no reason to follow another man's ethics when you are just as capable of making your own. Every pro-life argument stems from the principle that human life has an inherent dignity and that killing an innocent person is wrong. If that principle was just agreed to by people, rather than imposed by a higher power, then it could just as easily be abolished by other people.

view more: Next ›