by xparnie
3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

A change of reality would for a Trump supporter incontrovertible proof the election was fair and untarnished (lol)

For a normie it would be the same but reverse, the single hardest part though is breaking through the legacy media barrier, it would have to be so massive they'd need to be forced to report it.

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

6% is a MASSIVE amount of votes. How on earth do you 'lose' that many to a computer 'glitch'?

The US needs to remove every single machine used to place and count votes ASAP.

21
narvster 21 points ago +21 / -0

In my case I've now had 2 grandmother's funerals I've not been able to attend.

It's morally disgusting 🤢

Edit: thanks pedes for the replies, I really appreciate them.

by Raken
35
narvster 35 points ago +35 / -0

Barnes alluded on his Viva Frei livestream last night that he'd been called into Georgia to sort something out for the last week.

28
narvster 28 points ago +28 / -0

It's the MSM circle jerk, one outlet writes it, the rest rewrite linking back to the original article as a source.

It's a great way to create great big stinking lies and propaganda.

29
narvster 29 points ago +31 / -2

It begins, they feel very, very confident now. We must fight back hard!

1
narvster 1 point ago +1 / -0

I know, which is why I said great for you, it's just everyone else problems.

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

It's not hard for 20-30 people to count one small precinct or voting district. The UK still does it all by hand, our first real voter fraud case wasn't too long ago because of... Mail in ballots.

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not even that just have people count, stack em in piles of 100 say for each candidate, someone checks it, someone else can check it if they like. Everyone agrees the result and publish.

No need for technology for the simplest of tasks.

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Of course they do, if they're trying to end them in some forsaken part of the world.

18
narvster 18 points ago +18 / -0

Whilst it's great for you, it just means you'll be replaced by a cookie cutter CRT train teacher. Toxic stuff.

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

Via MS, there is no way they're going to turn down a possibly huge revenue stream as changing the OS in say a Cruiser is not possible without potentially 100's millions in investment.

17
narvster 17 points ago +17 / -0

That's the thing with elections though trust is the single key factor, counting for a few extra hours isn't even slightly a reason to do anything to lose trust.

I know it's down to each state, but there needs to be a push to dump any machines in at least federal elections.

But, if ol' Joe gets in he'll probably push to make em mandatory to reduce the risk of the Coof or some such crap.

45
narvster 45 points ago +45 / -0

I still cannot fathom why anyone would allow a machine to touch any vote. How hard is it to mark a piece of paper, put it in a box then have someone count it?

3
narvster 3 points ago +3 / -0

If I remember my MS Partner days correctly, Microsoft run a special support function expressly for government users of their OS. I think back in 2010 they were still supporting Windows 95 in some critical applications.

Not sure if this is the case, but it costs a TON of money to do it, taxpayers money, so it doesn't really count... 😠

2
narvster 2 points ago +2 / -0

Must have been an old rich white male excising his privilege.

10
narvster 10 points ago +10 / -0

My gran before she died tested positive twice for covid and negative 3 times, one negative coming just after a positive.

The testing is junk science as even one molecule can be amped up to a positive result.

30
narvster 30 points ago +30 / -0

Well UPS did "lose" Tucker's Biden documents, so he's probably not wrong.

Of course they "found" once a huge stink was made of it.

15
narvster 15 points ago +16 / -1

Section 1a "Persons acting as an agent"

40
narvster 40 points ago +40 / -0

Tbh at the moment a mail in ballot could have been from Mickey Mouse and rejected and the media would scream disenfranchisement! It's all they've got.

Outside of election time it's 'racist' and during election its 'disenfranchisement'. Of course for a double whammy they do like 'racial disenfranchisement'

4
narvster 4 points ago +4 / -0

It's an excuse to allow them to choose their investigation targets. It's the perfect case of the media and parts of the government working in cahoots.

2
narvster 2 points ago +2 / -0

I'm almost of the belief that lack a of mental capacity should exclude you from the vote. Of course it would mean no Democrat would be able to vote.

5
narvster 5 points ago +5 / -0

Every bit of election fraud starts with one vote.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›