1
nasty_pelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Apparently these electors can be counted if the other ones are deemed invalid, at least judging by the fact that this is how two slates were sent from HI in 1960.

This is all very unclear, perhaps purposely so.

4
nasty_pelosi 4 points ago +4 / -0

At least with the internet thing, he said the machines are "not meant to" be connected, so he weaseled out of that one.

2
nasty_pelosi 2 points ago +2 / -0

Demoralizing the base and splitting the party is a big win for the dems and RINOs.

1
nasty_pelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Things that sound good but are actually bad:

  • What's the point of voting if elections are rigged?

Sounds good, but is bad because if we don't vote, we guarantee that we won't win. The riggers need to be forced to keep rigging to have any chance of getting caught.

  • Form a new party, Republicans suck.

Sounds good, but we lose any existing base and essentially split the GOP into two parties, guaranteeing we'll never win against unified dems. What really needs to happen is a cleansing of the Republican party of RINOs, chicoms, and other non-MAGA scum.

1
nasty_pelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

Are these press beatings archived somewhere? They're pretty entertaining.

3
nasty_pelosi 3 points ago +3 / -0

None of these are actually legit unless the legislature certifies them, correct?

11
nasty_pelosi 11 points ago +11 / -0

This. I suspect there is a lot of deal making going on in the background right now, and public statements should be viewed with that in mind.

3
nasty_pelosi 3 points ago +3 / -0

From what I understand, fraud is a completely separate matter from this case.

Generally the right way to deal with fraud is on criminal court anyway. People need to go to jail.

5
nasty_pelosi 5 points ago +5 / -0

Didn't they war-game the "Trump not fucking leaving" scenario a while back?

3
nasty_pelosi 3 points ago +3 / -0

His post informs people of important facts as pertaining to the unusual actions of election officials and staff.

4
nasty_pelosi 4 points ago +4 / -0

"Human drop boxes" at a "Democracy in the park" event?

Sounds like vote harvesting to me.

2
nasty_pelosi 2 points ago +2 / -0

My favorite was the dude during the GA hearings whose statement basically centered around the fact that he drove four hours one way to get there.

That dude witnesses.

3
nasty_pelosi 3 points ago +3 / -0

I didn't know how many ballots were adjudicated, and I'm glad he posted that. If you realize that adjudication is one of the ways votes can be flipped, it becomes very very suspicious.

16
nasty_pelosi 16 points ago +17 / -1

Hopefully they were caught, and the fraud can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt.

9
nasty_pelosi 9 points ago +9 / -0

Yes. This is apparently one of the ways votes are shifted. According to Patrick Byrne, the adjudication process in these machines goes like this:

  1. Ballot is marked for adjudication (didn't read right, etc)
  2. Physical ballot is set aside, digital copy is stored on machine in an adjudication record or "bucket".
  3. The machine allows the operator to drag and drop the entire bucket of these digital ballots marked for adjudication to one candidate or the other.

Which candidate do you think they went to?

1
nasty_pelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

They are closed to new bets, and seemed sketchy at first glance.

1
nasty_pelosi 1 point ago +1 / -0

I doubt they'd pay up, but it might be worth it for the lulz.

4
nasty_pelosi 4 points ago +4 / -0

When any state sends a different slate, then it's officially on. And when it's officially on, the brakes are officially off.

2
nasty_pelosi 2 points ago +2 / -0

How do you pronounce that?

Wig-hur?

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›