Streisand effect. They never learn.
This is a dope thread. My first time seeing it.
12 more ballots.
From source:
“This is on top of the 55 ballots I reported were found last week, now making it 67 found ballots.”
Rejected without explanation.
https://www.newsmax.com/t/newsmax/article/1000615/1
Edit: this was a rejection of the request for emergency relief, not the actual case itself.
That last one seems like a weak argument to me, since to object you would have to show harm, which is exactly what is happening now.
But I'm not a lawyer and it's been a while since I stayed at a Holiday Inn.
Update (1006ET): The state of Pennsylvania has replied to the Texas lawsuit, arguing that it doesn't actually address Act 77 - a 2019 statute which allows voters to cast mail-in ballots for any reason.
Pennsylvania also argues that Texas doesn't articulate how 'massive disenfranchisement' of voters by tossing out the results of the election 'would accord with the Due Process Clause, which requires the counting of votes cast in reasonable reliance on existing election rules,' and that the case at hand wouldn't result in a 'circuit split' - when two or more different circuit courts of appeals might rule differently on the same legal issue (and is one of the factors the Supreme Court uses when deciding to take cases).
PA is also arguing that Texas, or anyone, has had since 2019 to object to Act 77, which violates the 'doctrine of laches.'
This is the study that showed that wearing a mask does not prevent infection for the wearer.
Of course the spin is that it must certainly prevent infection being spread from the wearer, but that does not seem to be rooted in logic.
Guess that's the thanks the "frontline workers" get.
Is there even a mask ordinance where this is at?
One thing not clear to me is if they were flipping a massive amount of votes, wouldn't there be a paper trail and wouldn't this be easily discovered during a hand recount of the paper ballots?
I always thought it was just there as a joke.
Correct, but your original comment "Also - ranked choice voting. That’s one thing keeping CA red" makes no sense.
And CA doesn't have ranked choice as far as I know. Two democrats end up as the only candidates because they are picked on the total number of votes during primaries. In essence, the parties run against each other in the primaries, which is retarded.
Is there a full video of this out there?
Your comment about CA made no sense. Ranked choice is crazy IMO, when we can't even get regular vote counting to work correctly.
That is still irrelevant to the hearing. Sometimes you gotta listen to your lawyer, even if you are mad as hell.
OK so one of the poll workers "set up the table"? Where is that video? Where did the roller bags of ballots come from and who hid them under the table?
And are they really this dumb, to be doing blatantly illegal shit right underneath a camera?
So many questions...
That's worrisome. Legal name, fine. Maiden name - none of their business.
This is really sad. It probably wasn't wise to spell out her name on TV, but then again, they'll find her eventually. She has probably already moved.
I suspect the Trump campaign is protecting their witnesses.
This looks like deals are being made.
This is actually pretty interesting from a legal perspective. Historically this guy has done everything legally, and I can't imagine that recording and then leaking corporate phone calls is legal, unless protected by whistleblower laws maybe.
Retarded shill.
If anyone ever tells you not to vote - shill, deport.
Also the 781% turnout number is incorrect.
Yeah, I suspect something big is coming.