0
nevercomedownTRUMP 0 points ago +3 / -3

Possibly my wording is overbearing but to witness firsthand, see it in person, be a part of the process. Do the same as poll watching but get closer. I wanted to be right there and be damn sure Trump votes were being counted

1
nevercomedownTRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

You want to go to court with 90% correct information and the other 10% false? You risk it getting thrown out. I’m here to verify information if I can. What’s wrong with that? I know dominion is currently surveilling social media. I don’t know if they know about td win yet but I’m not risking getting doxxed from my main account where I’ve posted about local events

-3
nevercomedownTRUMP -3 points ago +2 / -5

I’m only a contractor so I don’t need it. If I saw anything, I would be blowing all the whistles. Sharing information on how things are done is what I feel like I can contribute at this time. Willing to let the legal team know everything I know but without having a specific incident, I don’t know if I qualify for their website reporting

2
nevercomedownTRUMP 2 points ago +3 / -1

Correct. He may even just be combining the results on his end then looking for the county worker to hand to for the results upload. By the video, it seemed too quick to be upload unless it was just the small amount of ballots on the cart. Tabulators are to not be connected to the internet. As for a network... I’ve worked at a county where they have a local network, easily transfers results over for validating ballots and adding the write ins. Totally offline, then those final results go on usb. Then uploaded by the county online. I can’t completely confirm what he’s doing but from what it looked like he was in rtr (possibly combining results) on the tabulator then saving/opening the files on the laptop. If validating/applying write-ins is what you mean by editing, it’s not that point. Could be sending it to that point. The laptop didn’t look like the pages I’ve seen the county use for uploading results.

0
nevercomedownTRUMP 0 points ago +5 / -5

I worked with conservative/Trump supporting dominion employees and contractors along with me. It’s not like we can be at every county but the ones we are at, are covered. Have had to tell the press fuck off multiple times. Personally made sure Trump votes counted. Not happy with upper management

-7
nevercomedownTRUMP -7 points ago +1 / -8

Nothing really suspicious in what I’ve seen. (Don’t work in a swing state) Did hear about a dominion employee who had to report an incident. Saw tweets wrongly blaming them for it. Overall job, I’m pissed. I wanted to be involved in elections to make sure fraud didn’t happen. Then allegations come out on the very company I’m working with. It feels like I have a foot in the door but I wasn’t there to stop it

1
nevercomedownTRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

Haven’t seen that yet. Only USBs I’ve heard missing so far were the ones stolen in Philadelphia. Philly uses ES&S not dominion. No one should be placing any usb drives in except for the uploading of results. I’ll look into those allegations, thank you

-10
nevercomedownTRUMP -10 points ago +1 / -11

I have personal relationships with some of the county employees so they might trust me more than most. Interpret that as you will. They didn’t directly watch me but worked in the same room or adjacent room with a window or door between the two. Both Republicans and democrats inside. These rooms were locked and only allowed authorized employees by key cards. Would he be allowed to leave the room would be up to the county’s standards. Past elections I was able to walk around the buildings freely but for this one, I needed an escort whenever I left the scanning room. Standard procedure on combining each scanners’ results would be to upload as “mail-in tabulator 1,” “mail-in tabulator 2,” “provisional 1,” and so on (each desktop/scanner) onto a single usb. Then depending on county, you’d combine them yourself or hand it to the county worker to combine/upload. I never had a separate laptop. If one of my counties had me combine, I’d be able to do it on one of the scanning computers as dominion has that software installed. I didn’t notice him throwing the usb in the ballots. Will watch again. After the ballots have been scanned, my counties either would box then seal and sign (rep/dem) then lock in a vault, or they’d get escorted out of the room by rep/dem to a vault and locked twice over to only be accessed by the rep/dem together

1
nevercomedownTRUMP 1 point ago +1 / -0

That is exactly what I want to do. The website that the legal team has set up seems to ask for specific incidents when I don’t really have any. I might have information that could hold up what they have but I didn’t think that that was the right place to submit it

-15
nevercomedownTRUMP -15 points ago +3 / -18

If our shit isn’t 100% accurate, it’ll fall apart in court. In this particular video, there doesn’t seem to be anything. If he’s doing something wrong, then investigate further obviously

-3
nevercomedownTRUMP -3 points ago +2 / -5

The process entirely varies by county. Some counties can be up your ass, some can be lenient. From dominion’s end, I was trained on scanning ballots, combining results, and transferring results to usb. County did the rest. Some counties may use dominion employees/contractors for every part of the process besides opening and verifying the ballots. Some may not use any and just receive training for their own employees/contractors. Most I believe just use dominion employees/contractors for the scanning process. So yeah, as a contractor, I don’t know much on the software’s coding. In my 5+ years, I will say my scanners were never connected to the internet. Attack the company, no need to attack me. Everyone was encouraged to be poll watchers this election. I just felt the urge earlier than most. The public is supposed to be legally able to watch the process. Check to see if your county is currently auditing even if you’re not in a swing state. Observe for yourself

-2
nevercomedownTRUMP -2 points ago +2 / -4

I don’t work with the software and I’m not involved in a swing state so I may not see the same. A lot of the early fraud findings sounded like it would be on the board of elections people. With the findings on weighted votes and how there’s a code/setting, I didn’t see an option in the program I use to set up for my scanners. No idea where that could be set from that point or if it would come from where the results are uploaded. Some states are currently auditing, even if they’re not the notable ones. They’re supposed to be open to the public if you would like to watch the process

-55
nevercomedownTRUMP -55 points ago +13 / -68

Replied to another comment here but copying/pasting in case it’s buried.— Dominion contractor here. My devotion is to the USA and President Trump before anyone thinks otherwise. State I’m usually involved in does the Republican/democrat system as well. Varies how involved they were by the county. This election, the county I worked, they were tightly involved and had increased security. Past elections, they weren’t on top of each other but were always in the same room. If this video was taken at the end of the day, which by the tabulators looking finished, it looks that way, this could’ve been just innocently combining the results. The video didn’t show the others uploading on the usb though so either they only scanned on one machine or the witness just didn’t catch it. And yes, you can see the scanned images of the ballots inside of the folders. Why it looked like he opened a folder in the video? I don’t know. I check images periodically to check if the ballots are being read correctly. The scanners sometimes need to be wiped (with a cloth!) throughout the day. Paper dust, glue, etc. It could vary by county on who uploads the final results, but from my personal experience, after combining each tabulators’ results, I hand the usb off to the county board of elections employee to upload. If this was taken mid-day Election Day and they weren’t finished, this would be suspicious. I’ve only combined results once mid-day during a small election by request from the county. We never uploaded, only did so for mid-day results. We then deleted the old files and re-added them when we did the final results upload that night. I’ve said it in past posts as well, we need to be 100% accurate. This may automatically look suspicious to those that haven’t worked with it, but from doing it before, it doesn’t look too far off on what he’s supposed to be doing

2
nevercomedownTRUMP 2 points ago +2 / -0

Never worked on the icps. I’ve done the regular scanners like in the video for the past 5+ years. Usually just the plain cloth would work on the canon scanners. Maybe add water if needed. One election, the ballot printers used terrible paper and I think we had to use alcohol for that time

2
nevercomedownTRUMP 2 points ago +3 / -1

Dominion contractor here. My devotion is to the USA and President Trump before anyone thinks otherwise. State I’m usually involved in does the Republican/democrat system as well. Varies how involved they were by the county. This election, the county I worked, they were tightly involved and had increased security. Past elections, they weren’t on top of each other but were always in the same room. If this video was taken at the end of the day, which by the tabulators looking finished, it looks that way, this could’ve been just innocently combining the results. The video didn’t show the others uploading on the usb though so either they only scanned on one machine or the witness just didn’t catch it. And yes, you can see the scanned images of the ballots inside of the folders. Why it looked like he opened a folder in the video? I don’t know. I check images periodically to check if the ballots are being read correctly. The scanners sometimes need to be wiped (with a cloth!) throughout the day. Paper dust, glue, etc. It could vary by county on who uploads the final results, but from my personal experience, after combining each tabulators’ results, I hand the usb off to the county board of elections employee to upload. If this was taken mid-day Election Day and they weren’t finished, this would be suspicious. I’ve only combined results once mid-day during a small election by request from the county. We never uploaded, only did so for mid-day results. We then deleted the old files and re-added them when we did the final results upload that night. I’ve said it in past posts as well, we need to be 100% accurate. This may automatically look suspicious to those that haven’t worked with it, but from doing it before, it doesn’t look too far off on what he’s supposed to be doing

5
nevercomedownTRUMP 5 points ago +5 / -0

Is there another form or another way to contact the Trump team? I don’t feel I qualify for it. I’ve done contracting work with Dominion for years on elections. I didn’t encounter anything I thought was irregular at the counties I’ve worked at. I don’t know the high level people in the company, I’m not involved in the software, and the county workers I’ve dealt with have mostly been decent people. I mainly scanned ballots so if anything happened between the company and/or the county board of elections, that’s beyond me. The form asks for specific incidents whereas since I don’t seem to have one, I’d like to say I’m 100% behind the USA, fair elections, and therefore, making me 100% behind President Donald Trump. I’m not alone as I know a few full-time Dominion employees who feel the same. I believe they’re signed to non-disclosure agreements to speak about work so that could be why they feel stuck. Those employees don’t deserve the doxxing and threats. One f/t employee was part of reporting an incident I’ve seen on Twitter. A tweet claimed that the perpetrator(s) was with Dominion, that’s not true, they were part of reporting it. Another inaccuracy I’m seeing still says that Philadelphia uses Dominion. They do not, they use ES&S. The cowboy hat guy interviewed by Chanel on OAN has been wrong about that and has been inaccurate with a few other descriptions. I’m hoping the legal team isn’t basing cases off things that aren’t 100% true as to what the public is doing. I feel really small but if I somehow carry some sort of information to hold up what they have in the courts, I might need to buy a new suit. Count me in, Rudy.

2
nevercomedownTRUMP 2 points ago +2 / -0

I read further and saw what he meant by “blank ballots.” I don’t think I ever had it on but I think there’s a setting where you can have the scanner stop at blank ballots, ballots that don’t have votes filled. Whether that ballot was actually blank, partially filled, or filled with a wrong color would determine if it was blank. The scanner user would have to remove and examine it. If it’s blank, it’s ok to be scanned. Nothing will be counted except for being a voter. The other two problems would vary by county. Dominion employees and contractors are to not remediate the problems. That depends on board of elections workers and that varies by voter intent laws. I never worked in a location with it but I would assume they’d duplicate or hand count the ballot. Both of those are supposed to have a Republican and Democrat involved per ballot. Some states, counties?, could even deem the ballot as invalid completely

1
nevercomedownTRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

I mainly scan mail-in and provisional ballots. Nothing to do with the software. Don’t have a Twitter. Not sure what he means by “blank ballots.” “Overrun,” is much more innocent than he thinks. Overrunning a ballot in a batch is when a problem ballot comes along. Whether that ballot had something wrong to scan it (rip, fold, mark over a barcode usually) or the ballot’s town didn’t match the rest of the batch. The scanner would overrun that ballot by an x amount where the user would have to count back that amount, retrieve the problem ballot along with the remaining x amount of ballots that was overrun, either fix or remove problem ballot, then place those removed ballots back into the loading tray to be rescanned. None of those were counted so they’d need to be placed back in the remaining pile to be scanned. When it comes to transferring the results, that varies by county board of elections. The scanner user saves the results on a usb then hands it off to the county worker. How secure that is is up to the county. I’ve never worked in a big place like Detroit but in the smaller locations, scanners aren’t too far from the county worker who handles the results, usually both work in the same secure area

7
nevercomedownTRUMP 7 points ago +8 / -1

Hello, Mr. President. I’m a low level contractor with Dominion who has worked multiple elections. I didn’t witness anything unusual at the counties I’ve worked with and I don’t know the higher ups in the company, but if you were to have any questions on the scanning process, I may be able to answer them

1
nevercomedownTRUMP 1 point ago +2 / -1

I’ve posted about local events on my main account. I don’t want to be doxxed

view more: Next ›