The 2003 SARS outbreak infected only ~8,000 people worldwide.
The last SARS outbreak was in 2003.
No answer huh?
Yes, but dynamic IPs aren't a replacement for server hardening.
It is a DDoS if you can get the backend IPs cloudflare is shielding.
So you think every health entity in the world is colluding with the CDC to present these false statistics?
Are you suggesting that CDC data doesn't actually show severe fatality and infection rates? Or that the data is wrong/misleading?
Would you rather wear a mask or potentially kill someone (maybe even yourself)? Because that's what it really comes down to.
This disease is killing a lot of people and is very contagious. You might think it's 'just another disease' and not find the fatality rate concerning, but if too many people get infected at once, the healthcare system will be overwhelmed and fatalities will skyrocket.
tells me
Ok, so you don't actually know for sure.
for saying BLM is pimping out minoritys,
Sounds like it could've been worded slightly differently.
If your opinion clearly violates their rules, then you're doing something wrong - none of them are outrageous censorship of free speech. If you're suspended based on an interpretation of a vague rule, then sure, that can be a problem.
Masks are not proven to stop the virus.
It is certainly not proven but research is promising: https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2020.00818
Best case, the experts are wrong and you wore a mask for nothing.
Worst case, the experts are right and you helped slow the spread.
Masks don't have to be political.
Hahaha did you engage?
65% of sampled Americans. It's not uncommon nor misleading phrasing in statistics so long as sampling methods are transparent. Nobody expects the entire population to be polled.
But Trump said he wasn't involved?
edit: lol @ angry snowflakes going through my comment history and downvoting
Procedural medicinal treatment and understanding the biology of a virus (and associated disease) are very different things.