I respect what Snowden did but I am not convinced he's not a stooge or actor... blue check on Twitter, for one. Cheesy egotistical twitter bio. Whole thing could have been designed to normalize and soften the public up to the idea of being spied on and surveiled.
Assange on the other hand seems as real as it gets, from what I can tell. If he's fake then I'm pretty worried in general because anything could be, ha.
Well put pede. This timeline leaves enough room to deliver us victory with enough high energy, I believe, despite the struggle.
As for Q... I never assume it is real or anything, I prefer to put my faith in Trump himself, but there was some video of either Flynn or Flynn jr. literally saying WWG1WGA out loud at like a barbecue or family event or something. That is some serious psy-oping if it's just a psyop, which feels less likely over time, but who knows.
As you say, lots to chew on.
The more things that were let slide, the more cocky the Dems got, the more sloppy and careless their fraud was. And now, it seems, we have a lot of evidence. It had to be this way. Let's see what happens!
And ultimately, MAGA ranks above people going in the slammer, as much as I want both. Re-lection and entrenching Trump doctrine and prospering for at least four more years is paramount.
Well, if there really was any chance of that happening, it makes sense why Trump had to "lose" first before we win!
Sidestep that whole Biden not conceding and bringing in the UN timeline. No thanks.
Sounds like we flipped the script and are using their own scheme against them, AND exposing the fraud.
Perhaps, but if I my dad was friends with somebody with influence, and it would help my (his son's) future, I'm sure he would arrange the same. Most parents would.
Any parent would do this for their child given the chance and if it would help their child's prospects of success.
If there were shady dealings then yes not cool, but that does not appear to be the case.
I think everyone knows, but in case not, it's photoshopped.
The real image is here: https://archive.vn/2BK68
He has the whole backstory, according to him anyway, on his website. And at the very least he is legally able to say he created email without being challenged on it, so at the very least he won some court cases. Which part of his claim/story do you dispute?
I'm genuinely curious btw, I just don't know one way or the other.
Very possible.