This is a new form of censorship I've never seen before from Twitter. Instead of banning or removing, they changed every single tweet on the entire account to read "this account is temporarily unavailable"

Anyone get a mirror or screen capture of what it even said?

Not a MAGA hat in sight.

What's funny to me is that the Antifa agent provocateurs were too cheap to actually buy real Trump paraphernalia in their attempt to create the false flag. Just a lot of generic patriotic or flag apparel that probably came from a thrift store.

The only violence I saw from someone with Trump's name on them was the Antifa with a Trump bumper sticker on his helmet who on video banging on the glass over the Capitol entrance with a pipe. A dollar-store bumper sticker: this is how they pose as Trump supporters.

Meanwhile, he gets tackled and held down by people in full head-to-toe MAGA gear.

The Conservative movement needs to take a lesson from the digital pirates.

Hollywood has been trying to censor and stop piracy since the 90s. But they can't succeed because the pirates adapt faster than the laws and enforcement can. We started with centralized servers like Napster when those got shut down, we realized the danger of hosting anything in a place reachable by subpoena and thus Gnutella was born: the peer-to-peer precursor to torrents and filesharing networks like Kazaa, Limewire, eDonkey and so forth.

Today, thirty years after the war on digital piracy began, within five minutes I can go right from a search engine (like duckduckgo) to a torrent search engine (like rarbg) to a torrent file link (like magnet) to a download of virtually any movie or television show.

Why can't the same thing happen with the truth?

We need to start making torrents of information. Someone needs to adapt the same technologies used in oppressive regimes to smuggle information in and out, like Tor and Onion sites and browsers. We need to create a peer to peer encrypted chat and web hosting that means nothing can be taken down unless they are willing to take down the entire Internet and crash the wealth and economy that is linked to it.

We need brave, smart nerds that can take the tools that digital pirates have been using for decades to be a thorn in the Hollywood's side, and use those same tools to become thorns in the Deep State and mainstream media's side.

Also, when irregularities are found, they can either be investigated fully and openly and transparently so that everyone is made aware of them...

Or they can be covered up and turn a single bad actor into a conspiracy that corrupts an election. Even without the candidate who benefits being involved, or even aware.

I could be wrong but I believe you can fly without ID if you go through secondary screening. You should be able to verify you purchased the ticket with the information you used to purchase the ticket (which you should be able to get from your bank). I know people who have lost their wallets too and were still able to get on a flight home, but I do know it was a very complicated process that involved working with the airline agents over multiple calls.

I'm now arguing with myself over the semantics of "boat" versus "ship"

New movement Tea Party 2.0 when

If you think that's the endgame, they'd come after you for the crime of just not supporting their New World Order enthusiastically enough, never mind supporting the "wrong" party.

And 2A means it's going to be pretty hard to just arrest people wholesale.

Because the first step into fixing a broken and corrupt election system is identifying people who support and benefit from it, and people who fight against it.

Me mashing my refresh button every few seconds

This reminds me of my dorm in college, which was like a six-story high-rise and most windows had some kind of sign or flag in them visible from the quad.

The part where the idiot is screaming at 2:45 and yells "NO!!!" and the person taking the roll call calmly repeats his vote had me laughing.

They are setting a Flynn trap for Tarrio. It doesn't matter that this is a hugely offensive, illegal, unconstitutional order. The corrupt oathbreakers WILL enforce it. They will use it to hold Tarrio for contempt of court indefinitely. It will be months before his case gets scheduled for a hearing with a judge to overturn/overrule it and in the meantime Tarrio is out of action.

Even if this does get overturned, there will be no consequence or penalty for the corrupt judge who made the order in the first place.

Hang them all, and let their bodies rot in the sun. We have moved past jury boxes at this point because the courts are corrupt. Ammo boxes is all that is left.

"Amanda Hugginkess? Amada Hugginkess? C'mon people I'm looking for Amanda Hugginkess"
- Moe Sizlack

You can go undercover and infiltrate the enemy!

The photo orientation problem is because Apple has chosen to do the right thing or the wrong thing depending on how you interpret EXIF (photo metadata) standards.

Apple's natural orientation for photos is landscape (so you can use the volume keys as a shutter button). When you turn your phone to portrait mode, Apple still records the image as it see it (now sideways) and then puts a setting in the EXIF data that says "rotate me 90 degrees when viewing".

As long as that photo stays within the universe of programs that read and process EXIF rotation data, everything is fine. But when you upload to websites that strip EXIF data for privacy reasons (because EXIF contains GPS coordinates) the rotation data is also removed and the result is the original sideways image.

There are apps you can download that can strip/change the EXIF rotation data and thus make the image behalf like a flat image. You can also use the screenshot method that many others have suggested.

Remember Playboy in the 60s was extremely softcore. Breasts and butts only, no pubic regions. Some could argue it was not much different than other forms of nude art like sculptures or paintings. This was the same time period that PG movies could even have light nudity in them provided it was in an appropriate context like topless natives etc. Playboy also had a large readership of very important individuals which gave it influence, so I believe there were a large number of famous interviews and some actual journalism done.

It is an interesting dichotomy none the less.

ramble ramble ramble, bitch bitch bitch "...senior citizens waiting overnight, could you tell us why?"

"Because we distributed the vaccine and there was a lot of demand."

"So are you're saying there was no plan?"

Has this total cunt never seen a line for concert tickets or iPhones or literally anything where demand outstrips availability? People fucking camp out for a week on the sidewalk because they want it first. You don't want to wait in a line? You go the fuck home and come back when demand has gone down from the first day of availability.

"Fweedom"

• Martin Luther King Jr.
• Wayne Gretsky
• Michael Scott

I believe Lin Wood is purposely being as offensive as possible to try and bait someone into suing him for defamation so that he can do discovery and depositions and have the truth come out in court under penalty of perjury.

Look at the Hunter Biden laptop. That was the biggest smoking gun in history and the coordinated mainstream media made it all disappear: pictures, text messages, dates, times, names, and even a witness with impeccable credentials coming forward to confirm it. It was a complete non-event and un-story that didn't affect the Biden campaign at all.

I think Lin knows that anything he releases would be instantly dismissed as manufactured or deep fakes or whatever else by the national media, and it would be swept under the rug. But if he can get one of these corrupt assholes into a deposition or better yet on the stand and ask, under oath, "where were you on the night of ____?" when Lin knows exactly where they were and what they were doing, those people will hang themselves.

I have no doubt it will be televised like every other Congressional committee, which means it would be every American doing the audit.

We have had slam dunks when we have been given the opportunity to make presentations before state legislatures. Doing that before Congress will produce the same result. Even with Democrats on the committee, what exactly can they introduce to disprove the evidence?

I like this approach. It's attacking the problem from two sides.

Hawley is straight up opposing certification. It's going for all-or-nothing, which is bold but also intimidates most of the cowards in Congress since it seems unprecedented (even though it isn't, as constitutional scholars and historians show).

Cruz, on the other hand, offers a very reasonable alternative: agree to a hardcore, expedited investigation that will be done before inauguration, or we join Hawley's position. "Not another investigation" you say... but here's the thing, we never have actually had a true on-the-congressional-record investigation. Everything so far has been sabotaged by the states.

We all know (hell, everyone knows) if there is an audit then Trump won hands down. We've been unable through courts or Democrat-led election officials to get a true audit performed all these months. I suspect that Cruz knows exactly where the bodies are buried and knows exactly which are the most offensive/illegal votes and so that will be what the commission will attack. They only need a few thousand votes thrown out because the margins are so ridiculously thin.

So if you are a GOP senator who is too afraid of Mitch, you can now hide behind Cruz and support his efforts, then run back to tell your base who keeps calling and emailing daily that you are objecting after all.

Danville is a pretty rich area. I'm pretty sure the guy could make more money staying open even with a $1000/day fine than by closing. Even a hot dog stand in the right area can make more than $1000/day.

People should be glad Rickrolling exists because back in my day, all the fake links people kept trying to get you to click on were either Goatse or Tubgirl.

I'm pretty sure that's an admission of discrimination that opens them up to about a thousand discrimination claims.

Closing the hotel with everyone out? It's their right to choose not to make any money.

But picking and choosing who is allowed to stay? With the supposed criteria being length of stay? So what happens if one of us Pedes wishes to book a long-term extended stay? Does that mean they will honor the reservation?

If not, that blatent discrimination against someone for their political beliefs unless they can establish WHY they are choosing those specific dates associated with a certain political group's need for accommodations.