3
nowrongwrong 3 points ago +3 / -0

This stupid bitch also wants the White House to take down all their fences...the weekend that 1million people are planning a protest at the White House. She actually demands no federal troops and no fences.

I'm shocked she's not including a big wooden horse with her letter as a peace offering.

6
nowrongwrong 6 points ago +6 / -0

No, this isn't a church gathering of 100 people.... we're protesting Satan.

3
nowrongwrong 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is there more? I want to read more.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow! This is awesome. Thanks to Project Veritas, Andy finally has names he can put in a lawsuit. He knows where they meet. He knows what businesses they own. He has someone to sue.

I'm sure he's wanted to do this for a very long time but suing "Anonymous Does 1-50" is a complete waste of time. Now he can sue everyone captured in the Veritas video and subpoena their records and depose them under oath to uncover the rest.

Bravo.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Link doesn't work? Anyone got a mirror?

6
nowrongwrong 6 points ago +11 / -5

I'm going to let Chris Rock speak for me because he's allowed to say the things I'm not.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3PJF0YE-x4

5
nowrongwrong 5 points ago +5 / -0

Understand this is why we don't need to worry even if Trump's Joint Chiefs or Department of Defense turn against him.

Every boot on the ground knows this President is the only one who cares about them and will not rest until they are safe and sound. Will not hesitate to let them take whatever action is necessary to protect themselves and their lives and the ones they care about.

If Trump asked them to hang all the generals and follow him, they would do it.

12
nowrongwrong 12 points ago +12 / -0

LOL what the fuck makes them "right-wing"? Right-wing are either conservatives or libertarians. Conservatives sure as fuck don't support the rioting and looting and destruction. And neither do libertarians, who hold private property as sacrosanct above all.

So this is obviously fucking Antifa just renamed to call themselves something that Deep State can claim is right-wing, despite the fact that nobody, literally NOBODY has ever heard of an actual group by this name before.

4
nowrongwrong 4 points ago +4 / -0

I mean, Elon Musk is OK guys. He's been against the shutdown, he's been against the bullshit the media is feeding people. He has some socialist ideas (like free power, free Internet) but he has just as many capitalist/libertarian ones.

Do any of us actually like the telecom monopolies? Or having basically only choice of 1 or maybe 2 Internet providers? AT&T and Verizon have allowed the NSA and the government to spy on and tap everything thing we do for decades. I'm in favor of anyone who can get rid of them.

Elon wants to make free unlimited Internet a basic human right. He's rich enough to basically fund the entire project himself (and that's expensive as hell). The real test is if it ends up being a truly free libertarian Internet with no censorship or gatekeepers. If so, this will be one of the greatest gifts to humanity in our planet's history. Imagine, for example, if all it took was cobbling together a tiny antenna or dish to forever have access to thedonald.win even if it gets censored by every Internet corporation in the US.

So it remains to be seen how this is implemented. I reserve judgment until I see the actual details or how access will be controlled. But Elon is rich enough and crazy enough to make this happen. We just have to hope this doesn't end up like the plotline of the movie Kingsmen.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Jeff Tiedrich is a shit fetishist because all he ever talks about is diapers and "boom-boom".

44
nowrongwrong 44 points ago +44 / -0

Why in God's name would they need to do an Ask Me Anything? What the fuck is there to ask about?

Redditard: is orange man bad?

AntifaAlex: yes

End of AMA

3
nowrongwrong 3 points ago +3 / -0

I wonder if tomorrow at the briefing Kayleigh will again have to answer seven questions on why law enforcement was aggressively attacking the peaceful White House protesters?

If so, I REALLY hope she has this clip cued up on the monitors.

4
nowrongwrong 4 points ago +4 / -0

We welcome questions, facts, and discussion. Just avoid "concern trolling". Trying to provoke controversy among Trump supporters is not what we are about.

The primary purpose of this website is to support President Trump because virtually every other website on the planet already has nothing but criticism and lies about him.

And remember, you don't have to want to have a beer with Trump in order to believe he's a fantastic President and the only sane choice over Biden. You can still support him as President, even if you don't happen to like things about his past or his manner of speech or his aggressive style.

We still consider that a Trump supporter. In fact Trump himself has thanked celebrities for saying they will still be voting for him even if they don't like him as a person.

2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

To be fair, there's a whole LOT of basement-dwelling retards of all ideologies.

I'd like to think the Trump Keyboard Warriors all have their own houses and jobs so we shouldn't feel slighted by that insult.

But I am sitting here in my underwear tho at 1AM so... that part may be true.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wow, leaders of the revolution, ya'll. Show them a zip-tie and they panic attack and collapse on the ground like a fainting goat.

2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

You make a good case, Pede, and you have good sources to back it up.

But there is one thing you are perhaps missing. I'm not a doctor so I can't describe the mechanism exactly, but with opioids, like heroin and the very similar fentanyl there is an increasing tolerance that develops as the user repeatedly takes the drug.

This means that the first time might take one hit to get high, but the next time one hit doesn't product the same effect so they take a second hit. The next time it takes three, and so on. The end result is that someone who is a habitual, regular user can absorb doses that would straight-up kill a person who had never taken a dose before.

I think Floyd was a habitual user, to the point that it took 11 ng/mL for him to get the kind of high he was after. Based on the reports of his behavior, it was definitely a serious high, but chances are his body was so tolerant of the drug that he was still semi-functional like an ordinary person on the 1-2 ng/mL level.

2
nowrongwrong 2 points ago +2 / -0

That means they have to release all four officers immediately, right? Because they were exposed and could therefore spread COVID to anyone else in prison.

They have to be released like all the other criminals were to #StopTheSpread.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Ironically, Popeye's is so BlacLivesMatter that they actually tweeted "without black people we wouldn't exist".

Which is fucking hilarious and true, but boy did that piss a bunch of black people off to hear it.

4
nowrongwrong 4 points ago +4 / -0

There's something wrong and something disgusting about black culture that makes it so they are not "allowed" to de-escalate and therefore end up resorting to deadly force over a fucking VERBAL dispute.

I mean, it's "racist" to compare black people to animals but, how is this behavior any fucking different than two bucks locking horns or two gorillas chest thumping at each other to assert dominance? Other than the fact that with actual animals when one backs down the fight is over and they don't fucking pull out a gun.

3
nowrongwrong 3 points ago +3 / -0

Seriously, a week before all this George Floyd shit happened, wasn't there a black nurse or something that got killed in her own home because of a bullshit no-knock warrant? They busted in, her boyfriend thought it was a robbery and shot, they returned a hail of bullets and she died.

Why isn't SHE the one that is made into a martyr? Because you know what, my white ass would be out there protesting arm-in-arm over that death. No-knock warrants are some unconstitutional bullshit and she was straight-up murdered because police lied to a judge about the "risk" of trying to capture a suspect that was only wanted for some piss-ant drug charge.

It's like how the black community went apeshit over the justified killing of that useless violent sack of crap Michael Brown. Pick your fucking battles and stop trying to make some of the worst members of your community into saints.

1
nowrongwrong 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wasn't this a ruling on a motion? It wasn't technically an appeal, was it?

I think Killary was just filing a motion to quash the subpoena compelling her to appear. If that motion was rejected, then the case (and subpoena) would proceed and she would be required to appear as ordered.

4
nowrongwrong 4 points ago +4 / -0

Quick, everyone white/asian/etc apply for a job at Microsoft. Doesn't matter what, any job, regardless of whether you are qualified or not.

When you get rejected, file an EEOC claim, then start calling lawyers. They will take your case no money up-front when they find out who the deep pocket is. As proof to the EEOC that you were discriminated against just present the quote from the CEO.

A proven case of discrimination by one of the deepest, wealthiest companies in the US? Congrats on your multi-million dollar settlement.

3
nowrongwrong 3 points ago +3 / -0

Ahem...2024?

MIKE PENCE!

He's more than earned a shot at the nomination with his excellent stewardship of the Coronavirus Task Force and his unwavering devotion to Trump's agenda. And he is completely scandal-free so he won't be sidetracked by accusations from gold-digging frauds the way poor Trump was because of his wild and crazy past.

Ted Cruz would make an excellent VP tho to be next in line after Pence.

Instead of nepotistic bullshit Bush/Clinton dynasties we can have an eternal MAGA dynasty!

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›