I think what I took away was that being overly romantic and sappy doesn't actually help with women. The character was always losing with the cat. It's the same with Roadrunner and Coyote: the main character is losing.
This is how comedy works. The main character does stupid shit to get laughs, not to set a fucking example.
It's the same concept as crime being a black phenomenon where 13% commits 50% of the crime.
When you look at most institutions in this country that are pushing critical theory, race based arguments, more and more -isms, and just general degeneracy, they are dispropotionatly Jewish. Second wave feminism is another example (Steinem, Dworkin, etc.) They are 2% of the population and 30%+ of the 1% who control our institutions. Look at Biden's administration, look at our foreign policy. The end goals are a global destabilization meant to turn all cultures into areas of consumption and commercialization. "You will own nothing and will like it" where everyrhing is a subscription based service, hpe do you think that will benefit the people who own those services, who's overrepresented in that area? Just start looking at those kinds of articles and take note of those authors.
Whites, especially white men, are the final roadblock in their push dismantle capitalism and meritocracy. The same dismantling Marx advocated for. That is what makes it a Jewish ideology. Capitalism is a Europeon phenomemon as advocated by Adam Smith. The inherent psychology of Jews is rooted in their historically nomadic, rootless societies. They simply don't have the same sense of historical traditions and valued like, say, the British, or Chinese, or Indians. They're push to constantly deconstuct culture through academic critique is obvious-obesity is healthy and beautiful, feces smeared on canvas is just as beautiful and valid as The Sistine Chapel.
Obviously, non-Jews aren't blameless in these ideologies, they didn't create them. They were the useful idiots; more butt goys to to the bidding. But it's hard to imagine any one of those people you listed ever coming to power without the genesis of a loser couch-dweller resentful of success and culture, Marx.
Much of the "Nazi" rhetoric today dissuades people away from the fact that communism is a Jewish ideology. Making Hitler the boogeyman is the tactic of people who want to distract people from the fact that communism killed vastly more people than fascism. We really need to stop with the "left are the real Nazi's today!" stuff. They're authoritarians or Stalinists. "They're just like Hitler" is a Jewish tactic playing on white sympathies of the Holocaust.
If you're a Superstraight male you're only attracted to women who were born as women and vice versa. It's been a lomg, hard-fought battlenover these last few days, but finally we can be brave in the face of oppression.
I'm great. I'm superstraight. And I control my fate.
Legitimizing or satirizing?
That's been a common tactic of the left. Imagine people thinking the old Colbert Show was legitimizing conservative beliefs. I'm all for fighting fire with fire. The right has always lacked a creative, sarcastic, and mocking tone compared to the left. I think that really changed in 2016 with a lot of people checking out of The Cathedral and taking their tools of rhetoric with them.
That said, I have made jokes about us reaching a singularity where the minute one of us comes up with an issue to mock, they will take up with a passion. Then the goal becomes to make things so miserable that the system collapses and the pedulum swings back hard.
Seriously. I was a smoker and always hated the culture around it. When I smoke, I want to do things. I clean up the house, fix stuff, draw up plans for my woodshop, practice instruments, compose music. Some people just want to melt on a couch and waste time.
Interestingly, they deny IQ is valid when it is brought up when discussing nehavior and crime.
Either way, your post only validates the argument for the allowance racial/ethnic seperation for those eho eant it. It goes both ways with whites squeezed in the middle.
Just a question: How much of that 2k from the do-nothings be returned back into the economy? And how many do-nothings are there relative to people who want to work or expand their skills/start a business?
I understand your concept, and agree for the most part. For me personally, any extra money in my pocket would be either invested in stocks or in new tools and materials for my woodshop amd music studio. My $2000 would return a profit amd wouldn't be sunk into new rims and other depreciating status symbols.
My real issue with UBI, is similar to yours. My issuse is not really that people won't work (although that is a reality), my issue is that there are people would would still over spend and need more because about 10-20% of people simply lack the intelligence and possess foresight to make good decisions.
If it were implemented, I would stop all other government welfare programs, foreign aid, and severely limit (like <0%) immigration.
Damn good reference.