the medical system is a giant scam, and every GOP who defended the status quo during the Obamacare debates deserves immense shame.
The ACA and single payer are not the answers, but that doesn't mean the current system isn't deeply broken and wildly corrupt.
This is actually a huge step to solving arguably one of the 10 biggest issues in America today.
True, it pales in comparison to these two - it's tiny compared to them.
But it's still a great initiative.
Romney's daughter did her job
...dude
it was
but it was satirizing something that really happened, instead of just dreaming up some insanity
there's another one with a hammer and sickle and stuff that is not real
but the black nationalist fist, yeah, that is real
You mean the edison data?
GA - https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/georgia/president.json
AZ - https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/arizona/president.json
MI - https://static01.nyt.com/elections-assets/2020/data/api/2020-11-03/race-page/michigan/president.json
In those JSON objects, there's a single variable called 'timeseries' that holds an array of the entire election data.
I'm very skeptical the ADL would ever print on paper words this overt.
It's a reply to this tweet
That's some very Jewish reasoning he's got there
Nobody was fat bank then
Before modern food, high fructose corn syrup and hydrogenated vegetable oil and all that shit
And America was 90% white at the time, so....
gets what she deserves for listening to rap lol
In cases like this...couldn't the student make a strong case that she would not be denied permission if she had done the exact same thing and were not white, and thus that her constitutional equal protection rights are being violated?
The problem is that this word is used to describe many radically different things.
Some of these are genuinely negative (hating someone because of their phenotype), while some are positive (White group advocacy, accurately observing social patterns, being completely honest about cause and effect relationships).
So, the word has lost all meaning and has become a bit of a joke.
Combine this with the leftist definition, where 'racist' has become little more than a racial slur against white people (a core blood libel of this virulent and institutionally powerful racial hate movement is that white people invented racism, the source of most problems on earth, and are uniquely responsible for perpetuating it).
So, the word 'racist' is used rarely to describe genuine negative things, often to demonize positive things, and often as a racialized slur itself.
The left makes a mess of everything, not the least language itself.
Even sites like the NYT or Buzzfeed have basic editorial policies; they are highly deceptive in subtle and sophisticated ways, but in general if they report that a cat ran up a tree, it's a safe bet that a cat did actually run up a tree (unless the sole basis is anonymous sources saying a cat ran up a tree; then all bets are off)
BIN is just garbage; for years they have reported things that had no basis in reality whatsoever.
holy shit my screen started glowing so bright, I'm gonna have to go pick up some nuclear sunglasses
that's the date of this specific upload; surely the primary source is not 'Trumpet News'
BTW, while looking into this, I ran into this story gloating about how Facebook banned the account of the guy in that video for, um, 'election influencing.'
I wonder how many Democrats they banned for 'election influencing???'
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/christopherm51/facebook-banned-alleged-russian-agent
Please never, ever use BeforeItsNews as a source. It's one of the dodgier sites on the Internet. It's '50/50' truth vs falsehood...
https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/christopherm51/facebook-banned-alleged-russian-agent
the testimony from around 8:30-21:20 was particularly compelling, and 25:55-30:20 was a blockbuster
Subtle
But not very subtle
Yes, it was literally dreamt up by a radical black nationalist in the 1960s
"While vote by mail appears to increase turnout for local elections, there is no evidence that it significantly expands participation in federal elections.40 Moreover, it raises concerns about privacy, as citizens voting at home may come under pressure to vote for certain candidates, and it increases the risk of fraud. Oregon appears to have avoided significant fraud in its vote-by-mail elections by introducing safeguards to protect ballot integrity, including signature verification. Vote by mail is, however, likely to increase the risks of fraud and of contested elections in other states, where the population is more mobile, where there is some history of troubled elections, or where the safeguards for ballot integrity are weaker.
The case of King County, Washington, is instructive. In the 2004 gubernatorial elections, when two in three ballots there were cast by mail, authorities lacked an effective system to track the number of ballots sent or returned. As a result, King County election officials were unable to account for all absentee ballots. Moreover, a number of provisional ballots were accepted without signature verification.41 The failures to account for all absentee ballots and to verify signatures on provisional ballots became issues in the protracted litigation that followed Washington state’s 2004 gubernatorial election."
How can you have a political party without any voters?
Source?