a new party isn't a viable solution, it's political suicide. The answer is a national movement to overtake the local party. A national movement that can target resources at local party leadership working against the people's interests. A national movement that will vet candidates and prevent the RINOs from ever seeing power.
Democrats have been targeting the local races for years. that's how they got so many AGs setting Antifa free, and then tossing the book at conservatives.
The problem is we don't know who to trust. Everyone who seeks leadership in the movement seems to flake out or go establishment. I keep waiting for this crowd to nominate a real national figurehead to take the lead in something like this.
Why aren't the developer types here creating a federated network? Open source software of the fediverse makes it possible to create a network with so many redundancies that it would be very hard to shut it down.
Look up Hubzilla, it's a group project for the free thinkers of the world.
Look into Hubzilla. It's part of the federated web and would be very difficult to shut down. It'd be like whack-a-mole. but it takes people to create the platforms and people to get the word out.
I was looking into it when stop the steal flocked to mewe. Everyone wants to run a group so hundreds were created, and none worked with one another.
Did you honestly think trump would send unarmed protestors into combat with policeA? Protestors are mostly families with kids and grandparents, not a militia.
If Trump was willing to fight an actual insurgency he has/had to call in the military and seize the voting machines and ballots under the insurrection act. Civilians can't effectively fight a military.
Did you honestly think trump would send unarmed protestors into combat with policeA? Protestors are mostly families with kids and grandparents, not a militia.
If Trump was willing to fight an actual insurgency he has/had to call in the military and seize the voting machines and ballots under the insurrection act. Civilians can't effectively fight a military.
Pence bailed on Trump.
This might be useful for light and warmth, if asked by someone in uniform.
https://www.wikihow.com/Make-Torches
best when accompanied by a nice walking stick, in case anyone asks.
A small business cannot make a cell phone, or a TV panel at competitive prices. Small business cannot run telecom. Economies of scale will always consolidate manufacturing and diseconomies of scale will always put innovation in the hands of small business.
Of course, there is the moving target of defining what is "small" business. Focus on keeping the supply chain majority domestic and it'll come together. If it's not too late with $30T in debt.
Think CCP style communism, not so much USSR. The oligarchs will shut the door to competition when they become part of the power structure. They will cement in their monopolies. We know these things never work out for them, but communism will surely work if the "right" people do it.. right?
well perhaps I've found Crispus Attucks.
Difference is, the Colonialists were defending their home. If you go to DC, armed, you become the aggressor. You will be portrayed as the aggressor. You will be deemed a "right wing" terrorist and become the poster child of the propaganda they've been trying to foist for 20 years. You won't be Crispus Attucks, you'll be Timothy McVeigh.
I guess I'm saying that plan won't work, and it will make any and every alternative effort that much harder. BLM had 80% support at one time, they are now in the gutter. They survive because the media deems it so and the politicians/DOJ refuse to prosecute. Take away the protection of the media and political authority and that's where you'd be. No public support and no political support.
Get a better plan? Hope so.
If you show up with an AR they won't be using rubber bullets. It's a political fight, the pitchfork is symbolic. And if you think a shooting war with police will win the hearts and minds of Americans you're mistaken. Why do you think they've been trying so hard to push conservatives into violence? It changes the narrative away from our message into theirs. Besides, who's going to volunteer as the next Crispus Attucks?
I disagree. We've been complacent and the major institutions have been taken over by the left/CCP. We woke up late and behind the 8-ball. (we meaning the majority of Republicans/conservatives, some of us have been screaming for years)
I'm not a coward, but I need more than mud on a wall as a plan. Taking my 9 to DC won't do much more than get me locked up. I think we'd be better served with torches and pitchforks.
Republicans aren't afraid, Dems are so much worse where would we go? No, it's not cowardice, it's being leaderless. Powerless. The majority of our party's leadership is conceding the election without so much as an objection. Our attempts at fighting back have been disjointed and fractured.
Trump can take the lead of the new Republican party, but he must exercise the his power to its limits and appoint someone like Powell to start indicting the criminals. Without indictments, there will be zero change.
The Muller investigation was based on nothing but indictments, no matter how frivolous they were, and it tied up progress for two years.
We're not cowards, but where is the strategy? Where are the people willing to enact justice?
Wouldn't it be nice if it were this simple? Unfortunately, if I joined a different party, I couldn't vote in a R primary. Lots of states like mine.
If everyone joined a third party, the conservative vote gets split and no conservatives are elected. Remember Ross Perot?
The Tea Party did affect change in many ways, but RINOs got wise quick and joined the movement just long enough to get elected... then joined the establishment.
I still believe we have to take over the R party to be effective. A solid vetting system that gets involved at the recruiting level. Firm commitments from candidates that prove their loyalty to the people's freedom. This would mean infiltrating the R party at the local level and driving out the hypocrites. This is a long term strategy for survival, because the war will never end; it's a war of human natures.
So there's the problem.. it's hard. At every level it's hard and it never gets easy, moreover, the opposition has superior numbers (of people in position), more resources ($$), and the high ground of political power. We have enough of the public to win, but we need to reach them. We need a foothold in the public discourse, they know this and it's why censorship is at an all time high. The fight has to be in the public eye, else there can be no lasting victory.
The primary opposition right now, IMHO, is media/big tech. These are the big guns that keep us from advancing. Like the guns above the beaches of Normandy, they have to be neutralized.
It's not naive, at worst it's wishful thinking, but so is a third party. The alternative? Memes and rants? vote in an fraud ridden system? We could red pill til the cows come home and it won't do any good if the people don't control the party.
As you've seen, violence strengthens our enemies. what does fighting for the nation look like?