sort of like this:

https://i.imgur.com/vswvi5D.png

Does anyone know what she was trying to say?

He is, but I also don’t think he’s doing anything. He’s just a puppet.

This is obviously just a thought experiment, but no one said he wasn’t white due to his speech or thoughts. Minority groups are routinely told they are not legitimate members of their groups unless they hold certain beliefs or behave in certain ways.

Example: the black beauty pageant winner today.

That's secession motivation right there.

Marines serve at the White House and Marine One (helicopter). When the president travels by airplane, he is served by the Air Force.

AWS is their cash cow.

What?!

The Bible teaches us to prepare for vigilante justice based solely upon your choice on who is worthy of life?

They all care about money, so who is paying them?

Okay, if we assume different hosting providers, which aren’t coordinating like what we’re seeing with Parler, then we may be good for a while.

I can’t believe I’m actually contemplating this right now. We’re either on the edge or already falling and don’t know it.

Honest question here: why wouldn’t those go down too? Are they hosted with different providers as well?

what is an Auschwitz shirt?

Wait for Texas and then follow the leader.

Actually, Washington retreated a lot. His job was to keep the fight going as long as possible. Risking open battle with the best army in the world at the time would have been stupid.

What state is that? That isn't DC.

Wow. Only a few hours left.

Most likely that person is local to the North Texas area so hasn't gone through security yet.

They use the tunnels all the time, its not abnormal. The tunnels connect their office buildings to the Capital so the Members and their staff can run back and forth quickly. There are even golf carts and moving sidewalks.

I'm not suggesting security isn't heightened, but interestingly the use of tunnels in this cases isn't as subversive as its sounds.

She's outside security here.

Agreed. Now go find every representative who voted against it and then look at their voting records and tell me if they read every word of every bill they voted for.

I agree it was a bad vote. We shouldn’t crucify everyone we disagree with. I probably see eye to eye with you on 99% of things, but am I now your enemy? I sure hope not.

I’m not happy about it either. If you read the rest of my comments I hope you can see I’m objecting to the idea that anybody can be ideologically perfect. That was a bad vote, but that doesn’t mean she is worthless or that there is someone better than her willing to run.

We all support Trump here, but you should be careful with this argument. Cash payments to citizens is a very socialist thing to promote, but we’re all on board with that aren’t we?

So how ideologically pure are we now?

I also seem to remember Trump signing an omnibus spending bill in the past. I think I remember him saying he’d never do it again. Point is that he learned, but he isn’t Pure either.

All that said, I love Trump, he’s not perfect and he’s exactly what America needs.

Reasonable take. Lost points.

You sound like an a-hole or a Jacobin. Maybe both. I’m ashamed that to some people you may be the sole representative of what a Trump supporter is.

What actions do you want to trust? Her fighting impeachment or her vote on this legislation? Or is it just whatever is the most recent act? I’m sure you are aware there won’t be anyone you agree with 100% of the time.

I will judge people holistically and I hope you do the same.