The idea that you can find an “unbiased” moderator is completely absurd. So why can’t we just use biases to get to the truth?

So what about this:

Have two moderators, one chosen by each candidate. The chosen moderator is responsible for asking the questions to the other side and vice versa.

For example, Trump chooses Rush, Levin, Tucker, whoever with sole purpose of asking Biden questions. Biden could chose Teepa Snow, or James Cantor, or even Xi Jinping for the same reason.

Just a thought. I think they’re have been debates similar to this in the past, but I think there has always been the veil of no bias, which obviously is complete bs.

• Majority of Police Officers are good, there goes the Antifa/BLM vote
• doesn't support the Green New Deal, there goes the AOC/Bernie vote
• wants to raise taxes, there goes the independent vote

This isn't the first election where Dems have used the recently reported election fraud strategies. This is something they've been doing for years, which means the results of those strategies are already built into their expectations.

With those same strategies they lost in 2016, and we're even stronger today than we were then. Moreover, ever single one of these examples that is discovered could lead to thousands of fraudulent ballots being tossed out.

This is good vs evil, right vs wrong. We're on offense and we're going to win.

We all know he's too far gone, senile some would say. Clearly he's just a mouthpiece, a Puppet the Masters can dance in front of those older white democrats that have voted democrat for years. #JoesPuppetMasters have been tweeting a lot today, they had a whole 12 minutes of speech to talk about you know. I figure we could let them know, that we know, who is calling the shots. We can talk to them directly.

For example: https://twitter.com/Ohwenss/status/1300630549594284032

Specifically, no "Protests" between the hours of 6pm and 8am. There is no reason "Protests" need to happen at night.