2
oldmanthedonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Doing the lord's work. This community needs to understand cryptocurrency is one of the most important inventions ever in the pursuit of freedom

1
oldmanthedonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

they'll use the "plight of the common folk" to try to get it out of the ecosystem but in reality the Federal Reserve just doesnt want any competition.

This.

2
oldmanthedonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Good question. There's a shortage of GDDR memory, which GPUs use and processors don't

5
oldmanthedonald 5 points ago +5 / -0

Wrong.

GPUs are used primarily to mine eth and other altcoins. Doge and Bitcoin are mined with ASICs.

While mining adds to the demand for GPUs, the primary reason GPU prices are through the roof is the global chip shortage affecting many industries and products including CPUs, gaming consoles, and even automotive.

2
oldmanthedonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

I can't tell if you're being sarcastic 😂

Either way, shadilay, fren. Have your mom save some tendies for me

2
oldmanthedonald 2 points ago +2 / -0

Stephen Hawking wasn't (my bad, I forgot he died) a rocket scientist. He was a theoretical physicist

What do you mean, you can't even mention what your IQ is? I've never heard of an unmentionable IQ

How many people have you met who have been administered an IQ test and told you their scores? In my entire life, I've known one person, who was a member of Mensa. The vast majority of people will never be administered an IQ test. They cost about $1,000. Anything outside of a professionally-administered test isn't a real test. An online test told me my IQ was 162, but that's meaningless. Again, throughout my lifetime, on real tests, I've consistently scored around 145

The Mensa member I mentioned had an IQ of about 130 (I don't remember the exact score) and there was a noticeable difference between us in real life that was always there

Of course I can't tell what your IQ is based on a handful of posts to a message board having nothing to do with spatial reasoning. I'd be more inclined to agree with you around 160+ (perhaps because that's all I, as a relative Luddite, can appreciate). IQ scores are less reliable past that point anyway because there's so few people to compare to

Ultimately, ours are subjective opinions, so we can agree to disagree and perhaps agree a bit too

1
oldmanthedonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Disagree. The difference between 100 and 120 is exactly the same as the difference between 140 and 160. That's how the scale works. Stephen Hawking (~160) is much smarter than me (~145). One standard deviation smarter (significant)

1
oldmanthedonald 1 point ago +1 / -0

Unfortunately for the prisoners, they don't kill them first