2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

The guy's manifesto is a joke. He's a violent criminal with decades of history, including admitting to cutting off someone's hand. And he has a problem with how Whites treat him? What, we didn't immediately hang out? That's the problem right.

Seriously, I almost wonder if he was an useful idiot or a bad actor, paid for by someone to cause trouble, but then I see how much the story is buried so I know it's sadly just a deranged fucking idiot.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Since it was dismissed, that means it won't likely be challenged again? It's not like they rejected it based on lack of standing, right?

4
onetruecliff 4 points ago +4 / -0

I have heard that various aspects of our infrastructure have been hacked by the Chinese for years, yet no one has ever done anything about it. It's pathetic if they haven't tried to fix it. Actually it's worse, it's downright criminal. These things can be fixed. And they must be fixed. The fact that they weren't is criminal. I don't care how many layers of bureaucracy prevent the lower level people from being held accountable, ultimately it should fall upon the heads of departments, and elected officials. if you get a report that says these things are compromised, you God damn well do your fucking job and fix it or you go to jail.

5
onetruecliff 5 points ago +5 / -0

The content of that Tweet link: Texas and nine other states sued Google on Wednesday, accusing it of working with Facebook Inc in an unlawful manner that violated antitrust law to boost its already-dominant online advertising business.

1
onetruecliff 1 point ago +1 / -0

Just remember, Stephen, you all started playing dirty. You just thought we wouldn't stand up to show you how to actually win the game by the real rules. You own the choices you and yours made, bitch.

1
onetruecliff 1 point ago +1 / -0

If the SCOTUS doesn't hear this one... I don't think the court can be trusted. Again, if it's some technicality, but they urge resubmitting, that's different. That happened in Michigan or Wisconsin. That's okay. But outright rejection... I'm just gonna buy more ammo at that point.

1
onetruecliff 1 point ago +1 / -0

I have often wondered how the hell such a place gets funded. But sometimes it's better to not know. I have my suspicions of who might be a benevolent benefactory. (wink)

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I will also add these, since they helped me:

2 Timothy 2:25 "with gentleness correcting those who are in opposition, if perhaps God may grant them repentance leading to the knowledge of the truth,"

Romans 1:25 "For they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshiped and served the creature rather than the Creator, who is blessed forever. Amen."

1 John 1:8 "If we say that we have no sin, we are deceiving ourselves and the truth is not in us."

You might also bring up some historical context about when a nation gives up on truth. Jeremiah 7:28, "You shall say to them, ‘This is the nation that did not obey the voice of the Lord their God or accept correction; truth has perished and has been cut off from their mouth."

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Just remember everyone: Twitter is swarming with dumb AI twitter bots posting agitating content, and Chinese shills. Don't waste your time trying to convince a lifeless machine or the enemy.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Well done, Pede!

(I wish there was Bass Pro near here.)

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

Buttigieg is lying to himself when he claims he is Christian. If he was, he wouldn't so be so cavalier in proclaiming the sin he won't repent from.

I don't care if you're gay or not. God loves you, and Christ died for you. But if you show no sense of repentance for a sin in your life, your life is not with Christ.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

PROSECUTE MITCH MCCONNEL.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

The record will show that Trump gave them all many chances to come forward, make things right, even make deals. He offered them mercy, many times, and they spit in his face and upon the flag every time. When justice arrives for them, there can be no criticism of its severity or fullness.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

John 8:32 - You will know the truth, and the truth will set you free. George Orwell: In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act.

If you want to try to bring them around, because it might make your life (and theirs) better, you should check out some psychology techniques. This isn't trickery, just a method of getting passed a closed-mind's barriers towards new thought.

There are probably several good resources. Two I know of:

Asking questions. When you ask a question, it flips the conversation from you engaged in attacking to them defending. THEY have to defend their position. Don't be aggressive about it. This approach does work but can take A LOT of patience. However it can (and probably should) be done over time, not in one intense session. This could take days and weeks. I would recommend you check out the book "Never Split the Difference" by Chris Voss, which is about how FBI negotiators deal with hostage situations. It's actually an entertaining read, well structured, short and punchy chapters. A good short primer if you need one. And hey, it's handy in other areas of life too. I used it to get salary bonuses when negotiating new jobs and contracts now.

Visual stories, not spoken ones. This is a well known technique where an audio spoken story is spliced onto a video that shows something very different yet related to the audio. An example being: Communist audio is playing, even better if it is modern Libshit leftists giving speeches in America, talking about how Socialism works so well. But the video is showing the horrors that Communism/Socialism leads to.

Another example: BLM audio narrators (usually from a totally different speech given) is playing, and they are claiming they are oppressed and black people are constantly attacked, and they are just peacefully seeking justice. But on screen we see white people being attacked, buildings burning, police being assaulted, riots, etc.

This second technique works because the person things the audio story is going to conclude an expected outcome. So the mind becomes more relaxed and willing to take things in. But the visual videos don't lie. Words are cheap, but a picture and video is worth 10,000 more. The cheap words of propaganda cannot overcome the visual demonstrations of truth against their lies.

This technique would also work if you could find an appropriate video compilation of people came over to the Trump side that aren't traditional white conservatives perhaps. Either way, best of luck to you. Be patient. Many people are very uncomfortable with confronting even weakly held internal conclusions and beliefs, and the world is challenging some really deep ones. But you have truth on your side. Now you need to get them to merely be exposed to it.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

I would say go to the funerals anyway, IF IT WOULD HELP YOU. If the people at won't allow you to go, politely but firmly insist. If they still won't, tell them you are finding another funeral home, and expect a 100% refund and apology immediately. Go find a funeral home that will let you grieve.

Of course, if there are other reasons you can't go, I'm sorry....

1
onetruecliff 1 point ago +1 / -0

What is the fucking point if the vaccine does nothing!?

3
onetruecliff 3 points ago +3 / -0

NO ONE SHOULD BE SHOPPING AT TARGET. They started the policy of allowing men into the woman's bathroom if the man identifies as a woman. As you might expect, invasion of privacy, sexual molestation, sexual assault, and eventually rape, ensued. Target has stubbornly refused to change this policy and called anyone who criticizes it for safety a bigot. They won't even talk about the middle ground of making a gender-neutral bathroom, because that is also bigoted.

I haven't shopped there in several years and no patriot should.

2
onetruecliff 2 points ago +2 / -0

When the law protects the people, it's a Republic. When the law protects the politicians, it's a Dictatorship.

1
onetruecliff 1 point ago +1 / -0

At this point, it should be FUCKING ILLEGAL AND HARSHLY PUNISHABLE BY LAW to overstep your bounds with respect to changing election rules. Seriously. That needs to be an outcome from this election.

view more: Next ›