No, you don't cede an inch of this country to them -- do you really think they'd leave you in peace?
Their handlers are afraid of it, yes.
That is unfortunately the consequence of elections -- and I say this with the utmost empathy: I live in a blue state.
That's a good and valid reason for preparing to not do any travelling, unless absolutely necessary after the election -- at the very least know the major travel arteries in your area and take precautions: keep your head on a swivel, travel only if you must, don't go putting the entire family in the minivan for any trips.
You give them too much credit for deep and independent thought, and foresight.
Nancy doesn't have the power to do that -- only the President; she might argue that the election is invalid, making her in charge, but that would be a longshot gambit.
She might call for it (and Obama did set up the possibility for the same), but I don't think any country would like to push that button, kick that hornet's nest (I could be wrong, but it would be a potential hornet's nest -- the vast majority of Americans of just about every stripe do not fancy the idea of foreigners getting into their business, especially foreigners with guns pushing them about; talk about making people go ballistic). No, they'll use factions within the U.S. -- nobody can fight Americans like other Americans.
Their handlers are becoming unhinged in their desperation.
True, but (and this is important) the CCP has its own greed and degeneracy problems, and as such, are just as vulnerable. That has to be kept in mind. It is a mutual agreement among thieves and murderers, degenerates of the highest order. Not just in one place or two, but many, very many. You could even say that their numbers are legion.
They never thought she'd lose because they didn't want to contemplate what might happen if she did.
That happened to us as well -- save your records!
It's a problem -- and yes, teachers can lose their jobs for wrongthink (me, for one). However, there are still some schools that are not completely psychotic; I'd advise finding one in which to teach. When one of the "liberal" teachers is telling the kids to "freedom is important, thank a veteran" (my kids' school), you know you've found a fairly promising school.
And, if you just cede the field (that has happened far too much and for far too long), then you've just given up -- I would tell you that yes, it can be hard in this climate, but you should at least try; give it a go. Teaching isn't for everyone (and some people are just no good at it), but it may be for you -- and it is a valuable, though often difficult, service.
Citizens can still exert a lot of control -- but they never do. Guys, school board meetings: go and go prepared.
Some of us just found out that they liked teaching their subject. My job prospects were: 1. working at my uncle's law firm and passing the bar (uh, no; I loved my uncle; he was a great lawyer...but I didn't want to work for him); 2. working at an alphabet agency (again, no; other relatives have worked for those..and, no); 3. keep working at the newspaper (oh, hell no); 4. teaching -- and I really liked it because I got to delve into and share the intellectual things I love the most -- grammar/language formation and literature/writing.
Because I've worked both public and private schools and the college, I never got summers off; and while the pay was decent, because I was always adjunct faculty it was never great...but, I got to do what I like to do and had access to resources about the intellectual topic I loved the most, so it was worth it for me. We all have our own motivations in life that we're willing to trade off other things to get. Just allow me to study the origins and evolution of Indo-European languages, and I'm a happy camper.
Teacher's unions were never good.
This summer BLM made up "anti-racism" curriculum and pushed it to school districts around the country -- they wanted state and local legislators to adopt their curriculum. They have apparently placed it on educational material sites.
FYI: teachers, this is why you check out the material you take from websites like this; don't just click download and print -- read the shit first! As for this teacher: if she used this worksheet, did she use other material (or make some) that showed BLM in a less positive light? And what grade level was this used for? (looks like elementary level, in which case, she should have stayed away from it -- I wouldn't do opposing viewpoints prior to 6th grade at the lowest -- unless the topic was "what's your favorite Halloween candy" or something like that).
No, she didn't steal it. That site is a compendium of worksheets that teachers can pay a subscription into to have access to worksheets -- that other teachers and curriculum organizations -- have submitted. Some are made by teachers themselves; some are submitted by organizations. There is a problem with relying too heavily on premade material (although I've used other teachers' material that isn't copyrighted myself -- if anything for ideas for teaching an assignment; just like I had to submit my own work to compendiums myself -- yes, had to: when I worked for a private education company that was part of the contract -- any material I made was owned by them). A lot of the younger teachers are told about this -- you don't have to make your own material, just check the copyright laws to make sure you aren't breaking those -- so they don't even look into what they are printing out...if it's on the website, then it must be ok (kinda like how people take in their news).
Quite a lot of the material on teacherpayteacher.com is school district is taken from workbooks; it's not teacher made. At a public school, the administration would have to clear using material from a site like that (or the administration isn't paying attention). Especially if she's running off that many pages.
This is part of that diversity training curriculum that BLM was pushing -- you'd be better off giving your local state representatives, the mayor, the governor, and the school board a piece of your mind....they're the ones that ok'd it.
Look into his wife too, or rather his wife's family (daddy worked for the UN).
And their favorite charity as of a while now: Save the Children (and specifically to Syrian aid)...which has connections to George Soros' Open Society...and the Clinton Foundation.
Dude's heavily connected to leftist causes.
I knew a liberal, who worked at a bank no less, that thought the refunds were a gift that the federal government gives people...she worked approving people's loans and shit...
You mean like his fake Kazakhstan Twitter account? Lot's of stuff on that to make a person go "hmmm".
And I should probably add that a look into his wife's background is worth some trouble as well as what charities (or charity) they're both involved with could be worth doing some reading up on as well.
I wouldn't let them off so easily -- that it is stupidity and/or ignorance that makes them think this way. They know what the term means, and they also know that they have actively supported the actions with which it is associated. They have condoned it; they have applauded those who have allowed it; they have celebrated it through their thoughts and actions -- knowing all along, yet willing to be willfully blind to the consequences of what they support. That means they are all complicit in the trafficking, abuse, and eventual deaths of children...they admit it by this little scurry around; this whistling past the graveyard as it were.
Don't let them off the hook; throw their banal evil right back into their faces (and I am talking about the rank and file voter here...evil is banal, dissembling, and hypocritical, and they took part in it all the while patting themselves upon the back for being such "good people"). They've been a part of the circle of filth and don't want to countenance their own participation.
I think the Dem knew exactly what the word meant in this context; what she did do was get that messaging out so delusional Dem supporters could have a cognitive dissonance rope to hang onto for dear life.
I had a conversation last winter with a co-worker of somewhat left leaning persuasion about the illegal problem and brought up child trafficking. Boy, did that person squirm -- well, you know, there's not that many..."but if it stops one, is it worhtwhile?"...well..."if it keeps one child from being trafficked"...uh, but the others, looking for a better life, uh..."would you say to that one child that their life is not worth it?"....well, no..."what is the price of a human soul?"....yeah, ok, you have a point.
The ones who haven't gone completely around the bend get very uncomfortable with this (which is a good thing, as it shows their moral compass hasn't gotten completely destroyed). But, they desperately cling to their programming, and sliding off into farce is one way to keep them hooked into that programming. Therefore, that lady is more evil than she is stupid -- and thus more damnable.
Bingo! And it went to people with connections to the Obama/Biden administration.
It's not about the hookers and blow. It's about foreign bribery and blackmail. And if your PM is going on trips to CCP and engaging in hookers and blow parties you might want to think about what else is going on -- like turning your country over to the CCP because they've got a lot more on your PM than pics with hookers and blow, just a thought.