by Korec
0
overtotheright 0 points ago +1 / -1

Since when does timing replace or deny legitimacy? If Biden gets inaugurated, he’ll still be an illegitimate president no matter how many decades pass.

by Korec
1
overtotheright 1 point ago +2 / -1

No the opposite haha. Islam brought them an invasion of millions of Arabs. They used to be way whiter before Islam.

by Korec
1
overtotheright 1 point ago +2 / -1

They’re not. They’re just too pussified to make a move like this because it’s likely to make Algeria the new Libya and they burned themselves badly when they hit Libya.

by Korec
1
overtotheright 1 point ago +2 / -1

Morocco’s current king is gay, so that ship sailed long ago!

by Korec
1
overtotheright 1 point ago +2 / -1

Yup and yup

by Korec
0
overtotheright 0 points ago +2 / -2

It’s not true. Morocco’s king at the time was merely a governor because Morocco was merely a province of the Ottoman Empire.

Western Sahara was also a province of the Ottoman Empire.

But they sent tributes through Morocco as it had deeper ties with the head honchos, naturally, as Morocco is closer geographically and larger economically.

An analogy would be claiming that Italy owns Iraq because tributes were sent through Palestine during the Roman Empire, which Rome also controlled.

It’s all about resources: Morocco wants the trillions in wealth that exists underneath Western Sahara, oil, gas, and phosphates.

by Korec
0
overtotheright 0 points ago +1 / -1

That’s bullshit man. You’re basically agreeing that we should give up because the media declared Biden as the winner in the 2020 election. We’ll never give up our fight for legitimate sovereignty. Neither will the natives of Western Sahara.

Morocco wants to steal their natural resources: trillions in oil, gas, and phosphates.

by Korec
0
overtotheright 0 points ago +2 / -2

Morocco didn’t exist in 1884. It was a province of the Moorish Caliph. Western Sahara was a different province.

Morocco claimed the country, against the will of its native people, because it has trillions in oil, gas and phosphates.

by Korec
-2
overtotheright -2 points ago +2 / -4

Haha that is not the full picture. The importance is trillions of dollars in economic wealth through oil, gas, and 80% of global phosphate reserves!

Morocco wants that money and has been fighting the locals since the 70’s to steal it from them.

by Korec
-8
overtotheright -8 points ago +2 / -10

No. Lame. Morocco built that wall around people in their own land because it wants to steal their natural resources.

by Korec
0
overtotheright 0 points ago +1 / -1

Just a small correction: it’s not exactly a harsh empty desert. It’s home to tribes who’ve lived there for thousands of years. It’s their land.

And it’s not empty: it’s got a shitload of unexploited oil stocks along with about 80% of Earth’s phosphate reserves. (Phosphate is a crucial ingredient in the production of synthetic fertilizers.) Basically this is a huge economic goldmine. We’re talking trillions of wealth that the locals have been unable to exploit due to the border disputes they’ve had with Morocco, who wanted to claim that wealth for itself.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s why we call them libtards!

Never forget the power of brainwashing: the people of Albania fully believed that Albania was the most influential and powerful nation on Earth right up until the fall of Communism.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

I’d go for that. But only if you needed to have a Drugs Permit. Like a Drivers Permit, you know? A series of lessons and an exam to pass demonstrating that you fully understand and are prepared to live up to the responsibilities and duties accorded to you by that Permit.

And the only way to actually get a Permit is by signing a statutory waiver that rescinds your right to any public office, rescinds your right to hold publicly facing position of power (such as a media or religious or executive job), and rescinds your right to vote.

You basically get a choice: do you want to spend your life on drugs, or do you want to contribute to your society.

And best of all? All drugs violations by non-Permit holders get a minimum mandatory 50 years in prison.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Hi, is this a good move or a poorly timed move? Everything pointed towards Texas having this on lock, so do they even need GEOTUS to get involved?

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Funny how so many black guys have Jewish names, isn’t it?

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Every other people that takes slaves castrates them. Ever notice how there’s jogger problems in those countries.

Obama’s invasion of Libya reignited the slave trade there (because globalists are the real slave traders, of course!). A slave goes for about $200 over there.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Shut up you Aussie faggot.

That’s not what 2A is about. You’re clearly a shill here to make us look bad. Deported!

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

We should be able to buy any weapons without restriction. If you read 2A, I believe it’s intentionally worded so vaguely because they intended that citizens could purchase any weapons that the government could purchase. Pity they didn’t explicitly state that.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Most of them are Freemasons and get ‘rewarded’ for their loyalty with promotions and vacations to sex tourism hotspots to fuck kids in Thailand/Cambodia. Those ones will happily cuck to any demands the globalist politicians make; including arresting you and me.

As an example: After the Stop The Steal MAGA march in DC, a few weeks ago, there was a small crowd of about 50-100 MAGA supporters outside Harry’s bar one night. Typical Trump supporters: not being rowdy, just having conversations and hanging out together. They couldn’t enter the bar because of COVID restrictions but they could purchase food & drinks to enjoy outside, it was about 11pm so the street was completely empty. No risk of infection, not even a risk of annoying other citizens. Then all of a sudden, dozens of DC cops descended on the scene to order everyone to leave the area. And they weren’t nice about it either. Heavy handed and forceful, even while some in the crowd chanted “Back the blue” and “Thank you cops” and “We love our police”! Their actions were fucking disgusting man. Not on our side at all.

Or rather, only some of them are on our side, on an individual basis. However, as an institution, they don’t see us as allies.

2
overtotheright 2 points ago +2 / -0

I used to support that until all the Trump supporters started getting banned from YouTube, then banned from PayPal, then banned from MasterCard. Complete depersoning. And all legal because they’re all private corporations who can choose who they do business with.

Only a matter of time before FedEx/UPS do the same.

So for the moment, even it’s it’s a waste of money, a USPS that guarantees service to all Trump supporters is better than the alternative. Hopefully with enough time, we can make it run more efficiently.

1
overtotheright 1 point ago +1 / -0

Balkanization like that would obviously lead to war. And we probably could not win it.

Think about it: what’ll they do right after we break away? They’ll import 2 billion immigrant refugees.

Then they’ll brainwash them to hate us.

Then they’ll invade with wave after wave of brown skin soldiers until we get overwhelmed.

We can’t let that happen. We need to keep the country intact, and we need to beat them mercilessly so that they don’t have anywhere they can call home.

2
overtotheright 2 points ago +2 / -0

There is not gonna be armed conflict.

They’re faggots. They’ll accept it peacefully and spend 4 years moaning again.

At worst, they’ll riot in a ‘peaceful protest’ but I don’t think anyone is gonna give us shit if we put them down ourselves by protecting our streets after everything that’s happened over the past 6 months.

21
overtotheright 21 points ago +21 / -0

Thanks! The more of us that call, the less likely this unfortunate guy will be fired.

We need to do this every time one of our guys gets threatened. Everyone in corporate America remembers what happened to Gillette after they got woke. We need these guys to fear us and to understand that we are capable of using our purchasing decisions to harm any company who attacks our people.

41
overtotheright 41 points ago +41 / -0

I called the numbers in that picture. It’s Ford corporate. I reported that Cynthia is doxing and harassing their staff members and promised that if they target their staff and tolerate harassment and doxxing, I’ll never buy another Ford again, for me or my business; and I’ll inform everybody I know about Ford’s anti-American activities.

view more: ‹ Prev Next ›